Archive for the 'Develop Delays' Category

eligibility for regional center services for mental retardation, autism and other conditions

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

The regional centers in California assist persons who are substantially disabled in several areas and have a diagnosis of mental retardation, autism, cerebral palsy or seizure disorders. Licensed psychologists employed by the regional centers assess and make the diagnosis and the regional center clinical team determines substantial handicap and eligibility.

Is the applicant substantially handicapped in several areas? To determine substantial handicap there are various rating scales that can assist. Gathering rating information from both the family and also another source (such as a teacher or social worker) is typically done. The Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) is one quite good rating scale that may be used.

BlogBabel Tags: , , ,

DDS wastes money on research that finds more cases of autism located close to regional centers?

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

At times one wonders why huge sums of money are spent on research! The article below finds more autism is diagnosed close to regional centers and that more education and race is connected than environmental factors.

This money could have been better spent on what probably can reduce autistic spectrum disorders — reduce use of ultra sound and other invasive technology to medical necessity and reduce use of chemicals and pollutants in the home environments What goes on pre-birth, such as use of drugs and alcohol, has huge effects on development.

This study found that more cases of autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) are found to be located close to places that diagnose ASD — regional centers. Why? It is not that there are more cases close to regional centers but that there is access to a services that can diagnose ASD.

Take San

ta Cruz County which has a large agricultural population in Watsonville which is Hispanic and a more highly educated population in Santa Cruz and Scotts Valley. Far more children of Caucasian higher educated parents are routinely diagnosed than are children from less educated farm workers.

Why? Because lower income, less educated Hispanics are working 10-12 hours a day six days a week. Many do not have the time, energy or money to take their children to regional centers for a diagnosis.

So far as I can see this sort of research is a huge waste of time and money. What do you think? Read below what the researchers found:

“Researchers at UC Davis have identified 10 locations in California where the incidence of autism is higher than surrounding areas in the same region. Most of the areas, or clusters, are in locations where parents have higher-than-average levels of educational attainment. Because children with more educated parents are more likely to be diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, one need look no further for a cause, the authors say. The other clusters are located close to major autism treatment centers.

“The clusters are located primarily in the high-population areas of Southern California and, to a lesser extent, in the San Francisco Bay Area. The researchers said that, while children born within the clusters during the study period were more likely to be diagnosed with autism, the majority of the state’s children with autism were born in adjacent areas outside the clusters.

“For the rigorous study, published online today in the journal Autism Research, scientists examined nearly all of the approximately 2-1/2 million births recorded in the state of California from 1996 through 2000. About 10,000 children born during that five-year period were later diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, according to the state Department of Developmental Services (DDS).

After mapping the state’s birth cohort based on where the mothers lived at the time when their children were born, the researchers pinpointed birth locations of children who were later diagnosed with autism. The study looked for areas of higher incidence within each of the service zones of DDS’s regional centers, which coordinate services for individuals with developmental disorders like autism.

“This is the first time that anyone has looked at the geography of autism births in California in order to see whether there might be some local patches of elevated environmental risk. This method ignores unknown widespread factors (such as a regional pollutant) that could increase autism incidence,” said Karla Van Meter, the study’s lead author. Van Meter is an epidemiologist and was a doctoral student in the UC Davis Department of Public Health Sciences and at the Center for Animal Disease Modeling and Surveillance when the study was conducted.

“This spatial study was extremely rigorous because we developed a methodology that greatly improved accuracy in identifying areas of higher autism incidence. With so many possible environmental health risk factors, we see this method as generally useful for focusing studies on exposures that are elevated in such clusters,” Van Meter said.

However, the researchers said that in this investigation the clusters probably are not correlated with specific environmental pollutants or other “exposures.” Rather, they corellate to areas where residents are more educated.

“What we found with these clusters was that they correlated with neighborhoods of high education or neighborhoods that were near a major treatment center for autism,” said senior author Irva Hertz-Picciotto, a professor of public health sciences and a researcher with the UC Davis MIND Institute.

“In the U.S., the children of older, white and highly educated parents are more likely to receive a diagnosis of autism or autism spectrum disorder. For this reason, the clusters we found are probably not a result of a common environmental exposure. Instead, the differences in education, age and ethnicity of parents comparing births in the cluster versus those outside the cluster were striking enough to explain the clusters of autism cases,” Hertz-Picciotto said.

Autism is a neurodevelopmental disability characterized by impaired social development and communication and restricted, repetitive behaviors. It is considered a lifelong condition that develops by the time a child is 3 years old. The researchers limited their study to the five-year period between 1996 and 2000 in order to allow all of the children born during that time to grow to an age by which they probably would have received a diagnosis – 6 years old.

Van Meter said that the increased risk of autism in these areas is roughly a doubling of the incidence of autism over the incidence in the surrounding zone. For example, for the cluster area located in the service zone of the San Diego Regional Center, the autism incidence was 61.2 per 10,000 births and, in the rest of the Regional Center service zone, 27.1 per 10,000 births. For the Harbor Regional Center the incidence was 103.4 and 57.8, respectively. Van Meter added that it is important to remember that most of the children with autism were not born in the cluster areas.

In Southern California, the areas of increased incidence were located within these Regional Center service zones:

The Westside Regional Center, headquartered in Culver City, Calif., which serves the communities of western Los Angeles County, including the cities of Culver City, Inglewood and Santa Monica; The Harbor Regional Center, headquartered in Torrance, Calif., which serves southern Los Angeles County, including the cities of Bellflower, Harbor, Long Beach and Torrance; The North Los Angeles County Regional Center, headquartered in Van Nuys, Calif., which serves the San Fernando and Antelope valleys – two clusters were located in this regional center’s service zone. The South Central Los Angeles Regional Center, headquartered in Los Angeles, which serves the communities of Compton and Gardena; The Regional Center of Orange County, headquartered in Santa Ana, Calif., which serves the residents of Orange County; and The Regional Center of San Diego County, headquartered in San Diego, which serves people living in Imperial and San Diego counties.

In Northern California, the areas of increased incidence were located within these regional centers’ service zones:

The Golden Gate Regional Center, headquartered in San Francisco, which serves Marin and San Mateo counties and the City and County of San Francisco. Two clusters were located within the Golden Gate Regional Center’s service zone; and The San Andreas Regional Center, headquartered in Campbell, Calif., which serves Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Monterey and San Benito counties.

Two areas of increased incidence were located in Central California regional centers’ service zones:

The Central Valley Regional Center, headquartered in Stockton, Calif., which serves Fresno, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced and Tulare counties; and The Valley Mountain Regional Center, headquartered in Fresno, Calif., which serves Amador, Calaveras, San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Tuolumne counties.

The South Central and Valley Mountain Regional Centers autism clusters were listed as “potential clusters” because their clusters met a reduced set of statistical conditions.

All of these areas were identified using a sophisticated new biostatistical testing procedure developed by Van Meter in collaboration with study co-author Lasse Christiansen and constructed on Christiansen’s earlier statistical work. This method looked for combinations of events, in this case, autism, within a set of locations, in this case, births, whose occurrence would not be expected to occur at random. This is the first application of that method. UC Davis undertook the epidemiological study as a step toward identifying geographic risk factors for autism in California, Van Meter said.

The study also examined demographic factors recorded on the children’s birth records that are known to be associated with both autism and residential location. These included having an older parent – a known autism risk factor. The researchers found a statistically significant but small association of the cluster areas with older parental age at the time their child was born.

Hertz-Picciotto said that the findings do not counter the idea that the environment plays a role in autism, but rather, help to focus attention toward certain types of exposures.

“Because of the strong link between demographics, particularly parental education, and the locations of clusters, other explanations for these pockets of high autism incidence, such as localized sources of exposure, are not likely,” Van Meter explained.

“The risk for a child with highly educated parents to be diagnosed with autism is probably not caused by the location of the mother’s residence or any local shared environmental exposures,” she said. “Our result indicates that the most likely sources of environmental hazards for autism in California are in or around the home or else are widespread.”

“The strong link between demographics, particularly parental education, and the locations of the clusters validated the effectiveness of the statistical method that we employed because it successfully identified areas where a known risk factor was concentrated,” she added.

Keywords: Autism, Conservation, Developmental Disabilities, Developmental Disorders, Ecology, Environment, Environmental Health, Epidemiology, Neurology, Pediatrics, Public Health, University of California – Davis – Health System.

BlogBabel Tags: , , , , , ,

Aptos psychologist: Parenting Special Needs magazine

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

This magazine has contributors from various disciplines. It looks interesting and we are linking to it. Parenting Special Needs

Your comments on this magazine?

BlogBabel Tags: ,

Aptos psychologist: a cerebral palsy love story between father and son

Thursday, January 28th, 2010
YouTube Preview Image

Cerebral palsy is overcome by this family’s commitment.

BlogBabel Tags: , ,

Autism Speaks is a US wide + organization

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

Go to www.autismspeaks.org for listings of resources all across the U.S. re autism. Autism Speaks

BlogBabel Tags: , ,

Aptos psychologist: How well does the ADOS assess for autism in toddlers?

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

The Aptos Psychologist says: The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) is a tool wherein an adult observes a child’s behavior in a structured setting. The ADOS does not include observations of the child with other children in real life settings.

Children often act very differently with adults than they do with same age peers. That there is no inclusion of real life ratings how the child does with other same age peers is a weakness of the ADOS. Further, in the original ADOS there was no examination of the 3rd category (repetitive behaviors) required for diagnosis of 299.0 Autistic Disorder.

Does the Model T module for under 3 children distinguish with “sensitivity” and “specificity” 299.00 Autistic Disorder from Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS)? It seems that the ADOS will distinguish “autistic spectrum disorders” (PDD-NOS, Autistic Disorder, Asperger’s Disorder) but does not distinguish between the ASD disorders.

Diagnosing autism in toddlers: The new ADOS Toddler Module enters the field
Written by Nestor Lopez-Duran PhD on Wednesday, May 20.2009

The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (The ADOS) is a diagnostic instrument that was created by the University of Michigan Professor Dr. Kathy Lord.

During the last 2 decades, the ADOS has become the most accepted diagnostic tool for autism spectrum disorders. The ADOS has 4 different overlapping ‘versions’ (or modules) that were designed to be used with individuals of various ages and abilities – including non-verbal individuals.

“However, the original ADOS is not very useful in the diagnosis of children under the age of 3. For these children, the ADOS is not specific enough. That is, it incorrectly identifies ASD in many children who actually have a non-ASD developmental delays.

“But why do we need an autism diagnostic instrument for children under 3?
There are actually a number of valid and important reasons in support of the early diagnosis of autism. When conducting evaluations of children with autism I hear parents describe how they knew that ’something was wrong’ since their child was very young. This phenomena is not just a clinical anecdote, as it has supported by research studies (see for example Chawarska et al. 2007 DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.0185.x) suggesting that in some children, clear symptoms of autism can be identified very early. In addition, a number of studies have shown that early intervention is extremely important in the treatment of autism, thus early identification would help families obtain the interventions they need.

“Given the need to have a diagnostic instrument that can be used with children under 3, Dr. Lord and her team at the University of Michigan have been working on a new ADOS module that would reliably identify autism in these young children. The results of these efforts have now been presented in an article to be published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. In the article, the authors described in detail the process that led to the development of the ADOS new toddler module (ADOS-Module T). However, I will limit this post to a description of the validation procedures.

In order to test this new module, the authors used the ADOS-Module T in 360 clinical evaluations with children under age 3 conducted at the University of Michigan Autism and Communication Disorders Clinic, and at the University of California-San Diego Autism Center of Excellence. These children included those who eventually would receive a diagnosis of non-ASD developmental delays, ASDs, or no diagnosis at all (typically developing). The ASD children had their clinical diagnoses of ASD based on a “best estimate” procedure conducted by specialists, and based partly on a modified version of the ADI-R. The non-ASD developmental disorder group as well as the typically developing group were also evaluated for ASDs with the ADI and they did not meet standards for ASDs.

So in essence, the ADOS-Module T was employed on 3 groups of children: Children with ASD, children with a non-ASD disorder, and typically developing children. The clinicians administering and scoring the ADOS-Module T were unaware of the eventual diagnoses of these children. This allows the researchers to examine the specificity and sensitivity of the new ADOS module in the correct identification of autism spectrum disorders.What is sensitivity and specificity? Sensitivity refers to how accurate the instrument is in the identification of autism when autism exist. For example, when a test has 80% sensitivity, this means that 80% of the time when a condition is present the test will ‘catch it’. Specificity however, refers to how well the test differentiates the target condition from other conditions. So for example, a test may have very high sensitivity in that every time the target condition (in this case autism) is present, the test gives you a ‘positive’ result. But the same test my have very low specificity, in that it also gives you a positive result when a different condition is present, so that it incorrectly identifies the target condition as present when it’s not there!

How did the new ADOS Module T perform?

1.The sensitivity of the ADOS Toddler module was 91%. That is, the test was able to correctly identify 91% of the cases of ASD (based on a cut off score of 12).
2.The specificity of the ADOS-Module T when tested against non-ASD disorders was also 91%. This means that only in 9% of the cases, the test suggested a diagnosis when the child had been previously identified as not having an ASD.
3.The specificity of the ADOS-Module T when tested against typically developing cases was 94%. That is, only in 6% of the cases, the test suggested a diagnosis in children who were actually typically developing kids.
These are actually excellent numbers and indicate that the ADOS Toddler Module has excellent sensitivity and specificity. However, the authors also described some general concerns and limitations.

The ADOS, although it is the most reliable and valid diagnostic instrument available, it is still only a clinical tool that must be used in the context of a comprehensive clinical evaluation and it is subservient to clinical judgment. Specifically, a diagnosis of autism is provided only when the person meets the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Therefore, clinicians must use their judgments in interpreting and applying the results from the ADOS. There will be cases when the ADOS suggests a diagnosis but the clinician will not provide the diagnosis because the child doesn’t meet full diagnostic criteria based on the DSM-IV.

So you may ask, what is the point? Why do we have the ADOS if all a clinician has to do is go down the list of the DSM-IV criteria and add up the check marks? The ADOS provides for a reliable and valid tool to assess for the specific symptoms included in the DSM-IV criteria and it helps the clinician interpret the child’s clinical presentation as it applies to the DSM-IV criteria. The ADOS standardizes this process so that diagnoses are less dependent upon other factors, such as biases in parental reporting of symptoms, or the skills or training of the clinician in properly indentifying such symptoms. Therefore, the ADOS greatly improves the validity and accuracy of our ‘clinical judgment’.

On a personal note and disclaimer. Dr. Luyster (lead author of the study), Dr. Richler, and Dr. Oti were all my classmates in graduate school and I congratulate them for their wonderful work. In addition Dr. Lord, creator of the ADOS and founder of the University of Michigan Autism and Communication Disorders Clinic, will be my collague this Fall when I join the University of Michigan faculty.

The Reference: Luyster, R., Gotham, K., Guthrie, W., Coffing, M., Petrak, R., Pierce, K., Bishop, S., Esler, A., Hus, V., Oti, R., Richler, J., Risi, S., & Lord, C. (2009). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Toddler Module: A New Module of a Standardized Diagnostic Measure for Autism Spectrum Disorders Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0746-z

Posted under: All Posts, Autism
Trackback URI | Comments RSS

4 Responses to “ Diagnosing autism in toddlers: The new ADOS Toddler Module enters the field ”
#1 Brandon Says:
May 20th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Very interesting. Mr. Lopez I hope you enjoy coming to the U of M. I am in the Adult Autism Social Group up there, so I know some of the researchers. I find the ADOS-T very interesting I will be sure to ask Katie Gotham more about it.

#2 Nestor Lopez-Duran PhD Says:
May 20th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Thank you Brandon for your comment. I’m sure I will enjoy Michigan. I went to graduate school there and coming back to join the faculty feels like coming back home. Cheers, Nestor.

#3 JulieL Says:
May 22nd, 2009 at 9:29 pm
I listed to a recent podcast with Professor Margot Prior. She noted that there is recent research in the US and UK stating that children can be, as she stated “picked up as at risk” for autism, at the age 12-24 months old. She was clear to state that this was not to say these would be always accurate, but it would be say a marker for close observation for that child. Do you know of anything regarding the research she speaks of? This new research article you present here seems to be adding to that body of agreement.

Thanks

#4 Pregnancy Questions Says:
June 16th, 2009 at 11:45 pm
Do you plan to keep this site updated? I sure hope so…it’s great.

Leave a Reply
Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

← Children talk about assistive devices: factors influencing device use in kids with cerebral palsy Proactive aggression: I’ll hit if you don’t hit back →
Most Popular Posts
Divalproex not effective for the treatment of child bipolar disorder: a pla… | 14495 view(s)
Father-daughter bond affects the daughters’ romantic relationships… | 10560 view(s)
DSM-V, dimensions, categories, and the elephant of impairment… | 7739 view(s)
Boys, girls, science, math, and sex intellectual differences… | 6473 view(s)
Diagnosing autism in toddlers: The new ADOS Toddler Module enters the field… | 6464 view(s)
Mirtazapine for the treatment of public masturbation and inappropriate sexu… | 4963 view(s)
Teen Smoking: Does watching movie stars smoking lead to long-term cigarette… | 4916 view(s)
Will teaching my baby to sign delay his speech?… | 4205 view(s)
Parenting Styles and Delinquency… | 4096 view(s)
Bullies and Victims: Boys will be boys or a symptom of distress?… | 3450 view(s)
Categories
Abuse

For more information about donating to Child-Psych.org click here.

About Us
Nestor L. Lopez-Duran, PhD.
I’m a clinical child psychologist and researcher, currently working as an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan. I conduct research on mood disorders in children and adolescents and coordinate the Neuropsychology assessment services at the University Center for the Child and the Family. I’m also the editor of Child-Psych, a research-based blog where I discuss the latest research findings on parenting, child disorders, and child development. Contact me at info@child-psych.org.

GUEST BLOGGER:

Nicole Hess, MS, CCC-SLP
Nicole is a Florida-based speech and language pathologist with over 10 years of experience working with children and adolescents with a variety of speech and language problems. She will be writing on issues related to language development, speech therapy, and communication disorders.

Read more About Child-Psych.org.
Subscribe to CPRB
Subscribe on the Kindle!

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow @childpsychology

Subscribe by Email

Recent Comments:
By RAJ on Early intervention for ADHD: More thoughts on our definitions of psychiatric disorders: Nestor; A last thought. In his 1943 seminal paper that introduced the concept of infantile autism as a distinct, previously unrecognized condition,…
By Nestor Lopez-Duran PhD on Early intervention for ADHD: More thoughts on our definitions of psychiatric disorders: RAJ the point you raise is well taken and very applicable to the current DSM-V discussions and I’m in agreement with you…
By RAJ on Early intervention for ADHD: More thoughts on our definitions of psychiatric disorders: Here is the current redefinition of autism under review by the APA’s working group on autism along the lines you discussed:…
By Farouk on Early intervention for ADHD: More thoughts on our definitions of psychiatric disorders: thanks for the detailed explanation
By Nestor Lopez-Duran PhD on Early intervention for ADHD: More thoughts on our definitions of psychiatric disorders: RAJ I am 100% in agreement that there are some major risks with ‘early markers’ research, especially in regards to…
Blogroll
Bridges 4 Kids
DevDelay.org
Education Statisti

BlogBabel Tags: , ,

Aptos psychologist: Identify autistic children at 12 months & offer interventons combining ABA and relationship building

Friday, December 11th, 2009

written by Cameorn S. Jackson, Ph.D., J.D., Licensed Psychologist
DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

There are two strands of therapy for young autistic children — the prickly rigor of Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) and the softer therapies such as FloorTime and P.L.A.Y. which focus on relationship building. ABA does a great job of jump starting language when there is none. However, ABA can be abrasive and often the parent is largely left out of the loop with the focus on the therapist-child relationship. As a psychologist I have always favored relationship building and having spontaneous fun with a child. Spontaneous, creative interactions between parent-child are so vital and important.

Now for interventions for young autistic children, researchers have combined the two approaches. Successfully!


The method — known as the Early Start Denver Model — can be used with children as young as 12 months. This is REAL progress in the therapy world for autistic children.

See the article below.

Study Finds Early Intervention For Toddlers With Autism Highly Effective
30 Nov 2009
“A novel early intervention program for very young children with autism – some as young as 18 months – is effective for improving IQ, language ability, and social interaction, a comprehensive new study has found.

“This is the first controlled study of an intensive early intervention that is appropriate for children with autism who are less than 2½ years of age. Given that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all 18- and 24-month-old children be screened for autism, it is crucial that we can offer parents effective therapies for children in this age range,” said Geraldine Dawson, Ph.D., chief science officer of Autism Speaks and the study’s lead author. “By starting as soon as the toddler is diagnosed, we hope to maximize the positive impact of the intervention.”

“The study, published online in the journal Pediatrics, examined an intervention called the Early Start Denver Model, which combines applied behavioral analysis (ABA) teaching methods with developmental ‘relationship-based’ approaches. This approach was novel because it blended the rigor of ABA with play-based routines that focused on building a relationship with the child.

While the youngest children in the study were 18 months old, the intervention is designed to be appropriate for children with autism as young as 12 months of age. Although previous studies have found that early intervention can be helpful for preschool-aged children, interventions for children who are toddlers are just now being tested. Autism is a lifelong neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by repetitive behaviors and impairment in verbal communication and social interaction. It is reported to affect one in 100 children in the United States.

“Infant brains are quite malleable so with this therapy we’re trying to capitalize on the potential of learning that an infant brain has in order to limit autism’s deleterious effects, to help children lead better lives,” said Sally Rogers, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, a study co-author and a researcher at the UC Davis MIND Institute in Sacramento, Calif. Rogers and Dawson developed the intervention.

“The five-year study took place at the University of Washington (UW) in Seattle and was led by Dawson, then a professor of psychology and director of the university’s Autism Center, in partnership with Rogers. It involved therapy for 48 diverse, 18- to 30-month-old children with autism and no other health problems. Milani Smith, who oversees the UW Autism Center’s clinical programs, provided day-to-day oversight.

The children were separated into two groups, one that received 20 hours a week of the intervention – two two-hour sessions five days a week – from UW specialists. They also received five hours a week of parent-delivered therapy. Children in the second group were referred to community-based programs for therapy. Both groups’ progress was monitored by UW researchers. At the beginning of the study there was no substantial difference in functioning between the two groups.
At the conclusion of the study, the IQs of the children in the intervention group had improved by an average of approximately 18 points, compared to a little more than four points in the comparison group. The intervention group also had a nearly 18-point improvement in receptive language (listening and understanding) compared to approximately 10 points in the comparison group. Seven of the children in the intervention group had enough improvement in overall skills to warrant a change in diagnosis from autism to the milder condition known as ‘pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified,’ or PDD-NOS. Only one child in the community-based intervention group had an improved diagnosis.

“We believe that the ESDM group made much more progress because it involved carefully structured teaching and a relationship-based approach to learning with many, many learning opportunities embedded in the play,” Rogers said.

“Parental involvement and use of these strategies at home during routine and daily activities are likely important ingredients of the success of the outcomes and their child’s progress. The study strongly affirms the positive outcomes of early intervention and the need for the earliest possible start,” Dawson said.

In this study, the intervention was provided in a toddler’s natural environment (their home) and delivered by trained therapists and parents who received instruction and training as part of the model.

“Parents and therapists both carried out the intervention toward individualized goals for each child, and worked collaboratively to improve how the children were responding socially, playing with toys, and communicating,” said Milani Smith, associate director of the UW Autism Center and a study co-author. “Parents are taught strategies for capturing their children’s attention and promoting communication. By using these strategies throughout the day, the children were offered many opportunities to learn to interact with others.”

Other study authors include Jeffrey Munson, Jamie Winter, Jessica Greenson, and Jennifer Varley, all of UW Autism Center or the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, and Amy Donaldson of the department of speech and hearing science, Portland State University, Portland, Ore.

The study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). NIMH has also funded a multi-site trial of the Early Start Denver Model which is currently being conducted at the University of Washington, the UC Davis MIND Institute and the University of Michigan.

Source: Jane E. Rubinstein
Autism Speaks

BlogBabel Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

This site is a member of web ring

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009


Powered by WebRing.



This site is a member of WebRing.

To browse visit
Here
.

Monterey Bay Forum is a member of various Web rings

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

Web Rings which Monterey Bay Forum has joined include: Asperger’s Web Ring, Assistance Dog World, Children’s Advocacy, Northern CA Webring and Home Education Special Needs …
f=j;y=cameronjacks;u=defurl”>

Powered by WebRing.

BlogBabel Tags: , , , ,

Aptos psychologist: Treatment for autistic children in Santa Cruz County?

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

written by Psychologist Dr. Cameron Smith Jackson 831 688-6002
www.FreedomOK.net/wordpress

This is written to assist parents with a child age 3 to 4 year old with autistic spectrum issues:

#1: First, get an accurate assessment of the child’s profile. Children with autism and related disorders typically have substantial difficulties in 3 different areas: Social, Communication and Repetitive, stereotyped Movements.

#2: The child’s profile should guide treatment. The areas that the child is weakest in are the ones to focus treatment.

For children with most difficulty in Socialization work on a) improving eye contact.

Once there is good eye contact, work on: b) getting & improving “joint attention” (child looks at you and at the toy between you and the child). Make sure that the child is looking at you. Then you look and point at the toy or object for joint attention. Make it a fun game. Reinforce by saying, “Good __ …” whatever action you are teaching. (Good putting ON the chair…Good putting UNDER the chair …)

For children with most difficultly in Routinized Movements assist the child with activities that help the child become better coordinated and have more control over their body.

For example, horseback riding (Monterey Bay Horsemanship & Therapeutic Center (831 761-1142) helps some autistic children enormously.

Swimming can greatly assist to gain better control and relax. The Simkins Family Swim Center in Santa Cruz can help. And the water is warm! (www.scparks.com/simkins_home.html 831 545-7946).

For children with Communication difficulties Speech services from therapists trained to work with autistic children is crucial.

A normal 3+ child looks forward to their fourth birthday. Most autistic children may “get it” that they get gifts and others are simply not interested in other children sharing their special day.

Some children have only a handful of words by age 2. For severe delays in language development some behavioral techniques can “jump-start” speech. The Bay School in Santa Cruz and ABRITE use behavioral techniques. These techniques are particularly useful for children with out of control behavior issues.

Softer techniques that encourage fun, spontaneous interactions include FloorTime by Dr. Greenspan and P.L.A.Y. offered by Easter Seals in Santa Cruz. I like these approaches as they put the tools for change in the hands of parents. Encouraging fun interactions more than likely will enhance overall family life.

Some other Santa Cruz County resources for children with autistic spectrum issues include: Special Olympics (831 429-4258) Special Parent Information Network (SPIN) and Shared Adventures www.shared.adventures

What kind of a program works best? What your child can tolerate and enjoy. Every child is different. Sufficient to encourage your child to want to be “in your world”.

Hope this is helpful! Use the Reply box for your questions and comments.
DrCameronJackson@gmail.com www.FreedomOK.net/wordpress