Monterey Bay Forum

Use pen, email and phone to contact your representatives in Congress. Tell your representatives that you want their public statement in writing that they oppose Obama-Care and will — if re-elected — repeal Obama-Care.

First step next week hopefully is that the U.S. Supreme Court, after hearing oral arguments, will find the individual mandate to be unconstitutional. And since the individual mandate is connected to all other parts of Obama-Care [no severability clause was deliberate] all of ObamaCare should be found unconstitutional. Probably sometime in June the U.S. Supreme Court will tell the public what they decide.

For now, keep telling your representatives and the newspapers and your friends and acquaintances what you think.

Here’s some information:

Obama-Care costs twice as much as predicted says CBO. Obama-Care puts decisions in hands of unknown government administrators instead of patients and their doctors.
written by DrCameronJackson@gmail.com
_______________

Below is from the American Spectator.

“American communists and the radical left generally have long targeted the Roman Catholic Church. They know their enemy, one that is both spiritual and eternal. They have long attempted to pit Protestants and Catholics against each other. It’s an old art, really, that’s today totally forgotten.

And so, is this tactic being resurrected right now under Barack Obama? Is this more of the “fundamental transformation” we were promised — elected by oblivious Americans in November 2008?

If Obama can frame his mandate as a matter of contraceptive freedom — rather than an obvious constitutional affront on religious liberty — he may be able to successfully pit large numbers of Protestants and even many Catholics against the institutional Catholic Church. It would be the kind of religious agitation that would make the Marxists of the last century — particularly Obama’s mentor — very proud. How’s that for “hope” and “change”?

Paul Kengor is professor of political science and executive director of the Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College. His books include The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism and Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century. He is currently writing a book on Frank Marshall Davis.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com

Wake up, Mr. Holder! Photo ID’s at voting polls prevent voter fraud.

[U.S. Justice sues Texas and South Carolina for requiring voter IDs at polling places.]

Mr. Holder, your anti photo-ID policies harm all U.S. residents — legal and illegal. Picture IDs make it possible for illegal and legal residents to enter the stream of commerce. Picture IDs prevent other types of fraud besides voter ID fraud.

Picture IDs keep people safe and prevent crime. Increasingly, typical Americans must show picture IDs in all sorts of situations.

For example, when you go the pharmacy you must produce a picture ID to get certain medications. When you pay by credit card – if the credit card says ‘produce picture ID’ — the clerk will examine a photo ID before getting a signature.

A couple years ago U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder refused to prosecute Afro-American Black Panthers standing with clubs outside polling places.

Now, Holder’s prosecution of states which require photo IDs in fact promotes fraud, not prevents fraud. Mr. Holder is not interested in reducing discrimination, his stated intention. It looks like Mr. Holder is far more interested in stuffing ballot boxes with Democrat Party votes. And voter fraud is the way to do so.
_______________
written by DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Snake eats frog near S.F. airport and government referees? And taxpayers pay? The dog walkers, teens and transients who gallivant around in the greenery near San Francisco International Airport are going to be cited for trespassing if they venture out again into the protected grassland, San Francisco police and airport security announced Monday.

The fenced-off piece of land, owned by the city of San Francisco and squeezed between Highway 101, the Caltrain tracks and Interstate 380 in San Mateo County, is sensitive habitat for the San Francisco gartersnake and the California red-legged frog, both listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.

Airport spokesman Michael McCarron said homeowners whose property abuts the wetland were recently sent a letter warning them that trespassers would be subject to arrest and an unspecified fine.

The 200-or-so-acre strip – which is crisscrossed with power lines, meters, and power and pumping stations – has been trod upon for decades by the locals. Except for a few small city parks, the wetland is the only open space in the mostly working-class area of San Bruno and Millbrae, west of Bayshore Boulevard.

_______________

Well, it seems the snake’s favorite snack is frog so who referees that match?

JAJ48@aol.com http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/109312

Prison time & no more license to practice law for US Justice attorneys Friedrich, Glavin, Morris et al who withheld and manipulated evidence that lead to a guilty verdict for Alaska Senator Stevens?

Read the reports and you decide. (WSJ, 3-17-2012)

That’s what citizens can & probably should request happen to all the US Attorneys responsible for this failure of justice which changed the balance of power in the U.S. government. Those attorneys got their licence probably from the District of Columbia. The State can jerk their license. A judge could require an independent investigation. Obama could order his Attorney General to act ….

But don’t hold your breath [as you will turn blue in the face waiting] for U.S. Attorney Eric Holder or President Obama to act. Three years have passed and Holder has not disciplined any of the men or woman involved.

ObamaCare got vote #60 from Alaska Democrat Senator Mark Begich when Senator Stevens lost the election in 2008 shortly after U.S. Justice department obtained a guilty verdict based on systematic concealment of significant exculpatory evidence.

If the U.S. Supreme Court finds Obama-Care to be constitutional, there is nothing that the U.S. Congress cannot do. Very shortly, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments and decide.

If private citizens can be forced to purchase something such as health care insurance — or whatever consumer product — then the U.S. government can force citizens to purchase whatever the government tells them to buy. That is simply wrong.

So do speak up and tell your representatives. Complain by FAX, letter and email to your representatives and also to U.S.Justice Kagan. Tell them what what you think.

Trying to find an email address for Justice Kagan this is what is available:

“The Justices of the Court do not have email addresses or web sites. However, the Court staff and Justices does read letters from citizens. For complete information about the Supreme Court and searchable database of decisions, the definitive source is the Legal Information Institute from Cornell University. Hard to believe but the Supreme Court only has ‘snail’ mail. We do know — from the trail of emails from Kagan to Tribe of Harvard that she does send and receive email and strongly supports ObamaCare. Thus, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Kagan is hardly impartial.

U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Supreme Court Bldg.
Washington, DC 20543
(202) 479-3000

http://www.supremecourt.gov/visiting/visitorsguidetooralargument.aspx

The vote on Obama-Care is likely to be very close and could go either way.

Justice Kennedy’s vote is crucial because historically he has been the swing vote on the Supreme Court. Justice Kennedy has history other than as a ‘progressive’ or ‘liberal’. Thus, conservatives can predict [and also hope and pray] that Justice Kennedy will find ObamaCare aka Afordable Health Care to be NOT constitutional.

Justice Elena Kagan has not — and should — recluse herself [not participate] in hearing the ObamaCare case. Why? Because Justice Kagan has had dealings as a professional attorney with ObamaCare. Elena Kagan was Obama’s Solicitor General.

This means that Justice Kagan has a documented conflict of interest and should step aside. So, look at the sources of information below & elsewhere and them tell Justice Kagan to step aside and not hear ObamaCare. (more…)

President Obama accepts $1 million from Bill Maher [who calls himself a "a potty-mouth guy..." and who says his talent is "to get people to spill their fuc--ing guts out”]. That’s not exactly respectful language Maher uses to describe his audience.

Obama broadcasts his anti-conscience mandate that all employers including faith organizations will provide at no cost birth control pills, Obama telphones reproductive rights activist, Sandra Fluke. Obama publicly speaks out against Rush Limbaugh commenting, “No decent person would say…”

Obama says he leads by example. What example?

Think Machiavellian. Obama leads by the example of The Prince. “In the actions of men, and especially of Princes — from which there is no appeal — the end justifies the means.”

The Democrat controlled Senate recently voted down a law that would dismantle the heart of Obama-Care — the panel of experts that make all the decisions.

The way Obama-Care is set up, there will be no appeal from Obama-Care’s panel of 15 experts who decide your health care. (more…)