Archive for the 'Political Parties' Category

Firenze Sage: She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]

Thursday, May 16th, 2013
RICE 300x168 Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]

Rice lies for Obama

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice was honored Tuesday night with the 2013 Louis E. Martin Great American Award.

Specifically, the organization is honoring Rice for ”her work in advancing U.S. interests, strengthening the world’s common security and prosperity, and promoting respect for human rights,” another press release states.

Rice has “the absolute, total, complete confidence of the president,” Biden said at a gala for the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, according to press reports. “When she speaks… no one wonders whether or not she is speaking for the president.”

____________________

Firenze Sage:  It’s always encouraging to hear that the liars have control of the awards.     Four More Obama Years

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]

email Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]aol Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]backflip Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]google Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]digg Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]amazon Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]blogmarks Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]facebook Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]gmail Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]read it later Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]blogger Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]reader Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]live Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]yahoo Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]vodpod Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]technorati Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]share save 171 16 Firenze Sage:  She lies for the President [ U.N. Rice]

Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton it’s better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]

Saturday, May 11th, 2013
NULAND VICTORIA NOSE Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]

Victoria Nuland excised terrorist attack

The essential truth — that Islamic terrorists attacked  Bengazhi which resulted in the  murder of 4 Americans   — was excised  from the Rice  Talking Points. It was just a spontaneous demonstration said U.N. Ambassador Rice on five  Sunday talk shows.  How did the change occur?

It happened  due to the  massage of  various emails between CIA, State and the White House. It was done under the control of    Victoria Nuland,  who is close to  Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State.

Yes, it does matter when the government lies to the public.

Remember what happened to Pinnoccho.

PINNOCCHIO2 Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]

Hillary Clinton & Victoria Nuland?

See below the exact language used by Victoria Nuland.

_________________________________

Today ABC News confirmed that State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland raised specific objections to an original CIA draft on the Benghazi massacre.  Nuland pushed her superiors to completely delete numerous references of extremists linked to al-Qa’ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. She also persuaded more senior officials to delete information on at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants prior to 9-11.

NULAND CLINTON Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]

Victoria Nuland & Hilary Clinton

After all, an election was coming up.

Obama officials agreed with Nuland and decided to lie to the American people and claim that the offensive YouTube video was the reason for the attack.

But during her press conference on September 17, 2012, Victoria Nuland told reporters that what Ambassador Risce said on the Sunday talk shows was “very clear, very precise, about what our initial assessment of what happened.”

Victoria Nuland lied.

Here’s the transcript from the State Department:

QUESTION: Toria, in Friday’s briefing, Friday evening, you essentially stated that all questions concerning any aspect of the Benghazi attack – the circumstances surrounding it, the outcome of it, et cetera – would henceforth be directed by you to the FBI since it’s their investigation.

PINNOCCHIO Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]

And yet, on five Sunday shows yesterday, Ambassador Rice, who works for the same agency as you, was giving the latest U.S. assessment of how this event unfolded, specifically by saying we don’t believe it was premeditated or preplanned, and by saying that those with heavy arms and so forth showed up, in essence, as she put it, to hijack an ongoing demonstration.

So my first question for you is: Given that Ambassador Rice is out there talking publicly about it and not referring Bob Schieffer and Chris Wallace and the rest to the FBI, may we consider that we can again begin asking you questions at this podium about the circumstances of the attack? If it’s fair for the Ambassador to discuss it, it should be fair in this room, correct?

MS. NULAND: Well, let me start by reminding you that Ambassador Rice outranks me, as does my own boss, so she is often at liberty to say more than I am. And I guess that’s going to continue to be the case.

What I will say, though, is that Ambassador Rice, in her comments on every network over the weekend, was very clear, very precise, about what our initial assessment of what happened is.
 And this was not just her assessment. It was also an assessment that you’ve heard in comments coming from the intelligence community, in comments coming from the White House. I don’t have anything to give you beyond that.

She also made clear, as I had on Friday, that there is an ongoing FBI investigation. So frankly, I’m not sure that it’s useful to go beyond that. I’m not capable of going beyond that, and we’ll have to just see what the FBI investigation brings us.

QUESTION: You would acknowledge, however, that the account of the events, the preliminary account of the events that Ambassador Rice offered, diverges starkly from the account offered by the Libyan President, correct?

MS. NULAND:
 Well, we’ve heard a number of different things from Libya. I would simply say that what – the comments that Ambassador Rice made accurately reflect our government’s initial assessment.

It’s very clear today that lib Victoria Nuland was not honest with reporters.

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]

email Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]aol Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]backflip Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]google Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]digg Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]amazon Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]blogmarks Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]facebook Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]gmail Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]read it later Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]blogger Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]reader Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]live Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]yahoo Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]vodpod Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]technorati Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]share save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: Tell Hillary Clinton its better to speak the truth than to lie [Bengazhi]

Aptos Psychologist: Obama’s laughable immigration policy

Saturday, April 6th, 2013
USA OPEN BORDERS CHILDREN Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policy

undocumented persons cross open borders in USA

Obama’s immigration policy shows about as much skill level as Obama  recently demonstrated in basket ball (2 out of 22 shots made the basket). Laughable.

Everybody knows that you don’t put the cart before the horse. But  Obama does so with immigration.

A sensible Immigration Policy:

1) Close the border with Mexico.

2) Require E-verify to ensure  that employees are legally in the U.S.A.

3)  Create a flexible  Guest Worker program based on supply and demand for agriculture, restaurants and tourist industries. See Wall Street Journal, Green-Card Path Seen for Farm Help, April 6-7, 2013.

4) Fine adults & require community service hours for adults who break the existing immigration laws.

5) Do these steps and then put in place a legal pathway to citizenship such as Rubio  suggests. CNN Politics, Jan 12, 2013

The first step is Close the Border.

  Can Obama get behind sensible Immigration Reform?   Nope.  No way can we close the  border with Mexico  says Obama.  Janet Napolitano, in charge of Homeland Security, agrees with her boss.

In my view, Obama’s goal is to turn the 11 million illegals into Democrats who can vote in 2014.  Obama is forever the campaigner and never the national leader of sensible reform.

Other  countries successfully do close their borders.  For example, Israel successfully closed its border with Egypt and just about nobody gets through.

ISRAEL FENCE B Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policy

Israel closed its borders with Egypt successfully

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policy

email Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyaol Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policybackflip Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policygoogle Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policydigg Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyamazon Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyblogmarks Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyfacebook Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policygmail Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyread it later Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyblogger Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyreader Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policylive Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyyahoo Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyvodpod Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policytechnorati Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policyshare save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: Obamas laughable immigration policy

Aptos Psychologist: Two dead cops & Obama plays the Blame Game

Wednesday, February 27th, 2013

Who and why were two good cops killed recently in Santa Cruz, CA?  Remember the game of Clue? Who did it with what in what room? The game of Clue was acted out in Santa Cruz, CA.  We know who. Why it happened  will probably never be known.  Dead men tell no stories.   The man who killed the two good cops was himself killed.  As the game of Clue unfolds in Santa Cruz, CA the Blame Game  continues to unfold in Washington D.C.

Who did it to our Butler and our Baker in Santa Cruz, CA  with a gun outside a  home?  This is no kid game of Clue. Two good cops are dead.   Why?  Acts of a  person with explosive anger who slayed.  And, so  many  Santa Cruz  families and lives are torn.  A microcosm of national politics?   As the automatic budget cuts  kick in,   we have a Commander-in-Chief  and the Democrat party  who seek to  slay  with the  Blame game. And the Blame game  bring pain:  Four days pay not five for military families. Felons  loosed from  prisons. Threats  of dire consequences. In 2014 let’s vote the Blame gamers out.  For now,  we mourn our  Butler and our  Baker.

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Game

email Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gameaol Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gamebackflip Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gamegoogle Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gamedigg Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gameamazon Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gameblogmarks Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gamefacebook Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gamegmail Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gameread it later Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gameblogger Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gamereader Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gamelive Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gameyahoo Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gamevodpod Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gametechnorati Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Gameshare save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist:   Two dead cops  & Obama plays the Blame Game

Alejo’s pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!

Sunday, February 24th, 2013
BUS Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!

Alejo’s “fix” to exempt CA bus drivers from pension reform

Santa Cruz county assemblyman  Alejo’s got it all wrong

You have it all wrong, Mr. Alejo!

We need reform of the transit system, not exemptions. We need a competitive transit system that people will use. In      Santa Cruz County, most buses are typically nearly empty. Clearly, people don’t want to ride the bus. It’s not tough to figure out why.

In San Francisco bus drivers make more than $100,000 a year. Thanks to outdated federal rules and union policies, they get these bloated salaries. Guess how many competent, unemployed people ages 18-30 would happily drive a bus for $20,000 a year? And accept benefit terms that the taxpayers can live with? Your job, Mr. Alejo, is to look out for the residents of Santa Cruz County, not the unions.

Cameron Jackson, Santa Cruz

http://www.santacruzsentiinel

sharebookmarx Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!

email Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!aol Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!backflip Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!google Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!digg Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!amazon Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!blogmarks Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!facebook Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!gmail Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!read it later Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!blogger Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!reader Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!live Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!yahoo Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!vodpod Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!technorati Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!share save 171 16 Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!

Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2012
PONZI 300x192 Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]

Is Social Security a Ponzi? Krugman’s view 15 yrs ago and now.

Krugman says now:

” It’s true that Social Security is mainly a system in which each generation pays for the previous generation’s retirement, in the expectation that it will receive the same treatment from the next generation.  So there’s nothing Ponziesque at all.

Fifteen (15) years ago, Krugman said:

Social Security is structured from the point of view of the recipients as if it were an ordinary retirement plan: what you get out depends on what you put in. So it does not look like a re-distributionist scheme. In practice it has turned out to be strongly re- distributionist, but only because of its Ponzi game aspect, in which each generation takes more out than it put in. Well, the Ponzi game will soon be over….

____________________

Why does anyone bother reading this guy. He feels no compunction about making definitive claims in opposition to themselves depending on the party in power.

send comments to:  JAJ@aol.com

 

 

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]

email Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]aol Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]backflip Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]google Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]digg Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]amazon Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]blogmarks Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]facebook Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]gmail Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]read it later Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]blogger Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]reader Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]live Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]yahoo Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]vodpod Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]technorati Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]share save 171 16 Firenze Sage: Krugman vs Krugman [Social Security a Ponzi?]

Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holder's Justice Dept.]

Sunday, October 21st, 2012

FIRE HOLDER 300x300 Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]

Watch out for what’s on bumper stickers!

The Department of Justice funded a training manual used in the State and Local Anti-terrorism Training (SLATT) program for law enforcement. Apparently certain political bumper stickers can put you on the “could be a terrorist” list, including opposition to the United Nations and support for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

 

Another slide entitled “General Right Wing Extremist” – depicts suspicious bumper stickers that should warrant further investigation by cops conducting traffic stops.

The bumper stickers read, “Know Your Rights Or Lose Them,” and “If You Love Your Country, the U.N. Is Not Your Friend!,” and “Get US Out Of the United Nations”.

____________________

 

A “fire Holder” sticker gets you 50 years.

send comments to JAJ48@AOL.COM

 

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]

email Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]aol Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]backflip Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]google Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]digg Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]amazon Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]blogmarks Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]facebook Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]gmail Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]read it later Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]blogger Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]reader Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]live Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]yahoo Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]vodpod Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]technorati Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]share save 171 16 Firenze Sage: bumper stickers [and Eric Holders Justice Dept.]

Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]

Sunday, October 21st, 2012

 

ROYALS1 300x208 Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]

Obama family cost twice that of British royal family

US spends more than double on the Obama family  compared to British royal family:

Taxpayers spent $1.4 billion dollars on everything from staffing, housing, flying and entertaining President Obama and his family last year, according to the author of a new book on taxpayer-funded presidential perks.

In comparison, British taxpayers spent just $57.8 million on the royal family.
____________________

That’s it, lead by example. Feel their pain.

send comments to JAJ48@AOL.COM

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]

email Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]aol Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]backflip Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]google Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]digg Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]amazon Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]blogmarks Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]facebook Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]gmail Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]read it later Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]blogger Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]reader Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]live Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]yahoo Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]vodpod Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]technorati Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]share save 171 16 Firenze Sage: the royal Obamas [cost double the royal British]

Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedom

Sunday, October 21st, 2012
FORT HOOD 300x225 Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedom

Fort Hood Islamic jehad murders called ‘work place injury’ by Obama

Obama waves a magic wand and there’s no home grown terrorism, there’s no need to work for welfare, it’s fine to have a mosque at Ground Zero and the massacre at Ford Hood was just a ‘work place related injury’?

Really?  Scream in Arabic  that Allah is Great and murder  people and the public can be hood winked that  its just a work place injury? Just because Obama says so — does not make it so.

There is no home grown terror —  because Obama says so!  That  is Obama’s position on the massacre at Fort Hood.

And yes,  we must have a mosque at Ground Zero but Catholics cannot practice their religious beliefs. Why? Because Obama says so.

General Motors is alive  – and Bin Laden is dead.  Also dead  is our U.S. Ambassador Stevens to Libya.

What is Obama’s foreign policy?  America is to blame for whatever. The US must apologize for whatever. Per Obama, the US must lead from behind with the UN must take  leadership.

Think how Obama’s actions towards religious freedom   are connected to his foreign policies:

Remember the Mosque at Ground Zero supported by President Obama. What were Obama’s words?   We must support a mosque because this nation protects religious freedom said President Obama.  Does Obama know any  Islamic history?   Historically, when Islam claimed military  territory the first thing they did  was  put a mosque there.

A mosque at Ground Zero is one  way to spread jihad – the holy war – and show who has won.  A mosque at Ground Zero shows religious dominance not religious freedom.

Remember Obama riding rough shod over the Catholic bishops who provide substantial charity in America and world wide  based on Catholic teachings?  The ObamaCare regulation written by HHS Sibelius  requires all charities including Catholic to provide all forms of contraceptives to women  –  including sterilization, abortion and contraceptives.

When the Republicans held a hearing whether the ObamaCare regulation violated freedom of religion,  Nancy Pelosi held her own separate news conference and  brought out Sandra Fluke who said she and graduate students like her  should have free contraceptives paid for by the government.

Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats shifted  a discussion of protection of religious freedom for Catholics and other religions into into a War on Women waged  by the Republicans who  according to Pelosi  want to take away contraceptives from women.

Remember Fort Hood and that crazy MD who gunned all those people down shouting praise of Allah while he did so?  Now we learn that per Obama’s policies,  it  was a ‘workplace related injury’ not an act of terror. So no Occupational Therapy or therapy for those injured by that crazy Islamic extremist MD.

No one getting welfare has to work any more  Why? Because Obama says so!  So what that Democrat President Clinton signed a law requiring work as part of receiving welfare. No matter that the welfare rolls were cut in half and people reported that they felt better about themselves.

Maybe it is time for Americans to say no more of Obama’s policies. No more   waving a  magic,  pro-Islam wand and implementing policies that weaken freedoms abroad and here at home.

For two weeks, Obama blamed an  anti-Islam video made by an American  as the cause of Am. Stevens’ death. From Obama’s viewpoint, it had to be some act of stupidity by an American and not more jehad, not more Islamic extremists making  a holy war against America and Western values. The New York Times reported that the man responsible for murdering Am. Stevens is bragging about it while  sipping mango juice.

Then in the last debate,  Obama gets on TV and walks back the narrative. Now  he called Am. Stevens death an act of terrorism from day one.  Obama just waved his magic wand and he  makes it so! Supposedly.

Let’s hope Romney on Monday  asks some pointed questions:

Sir,  Mr. President, who in the White House  read the cables coming in from Am. Stevens saying he was in danger and security not sufficient?

When Ms. Lamb testified that “the assets were sufficient” did she know that the one plane there had been removed and two groups of security had been removed?  Did Ms. Lamb know there were 200 acts of terrorism the last year and that the Am. from Great Britain was attacked and that the Red Cross had withdrawn?

And Sir, exactly now many of the daily security briefings did you attend this last 3 months?  And why did you attend less than half?  Just too busy trying to get re-elected?

Sir, why did 6-7 days pass and a news agency picks up Am. Stevens diary and only then did the public learn that Am. Stevens thought his life was threatened and security lax?

Why no marines sent in based an hour or so away?  Yes or no Mr. President –  before you flew to Las Vegas, did you call a meeting of the agencies in charge of security and State Department? And why not?

There are a lot of foreign and domestic policy questions that need to be asked and answered.

Why a TRILLION dollar deficit each of the last four years?

Why NO immigration reform during the first two years when the Democrats held  the Senate and House and could pass any bill they wanted?

Why do you support importing Brazilian oil yet kill the pipeline from Canada which means jobs for Americans and oil for Americans instead of oil for China?

Why Mr. President do Democrats like Gore increase their wealth from 2 to 100 million after making investments in green corporations that you subsidized and subsequently went belly up?

Let’s hope that the American public asks for answers to these and other questions. And no more waving of magic wands by Obama!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/21/Obama-Doctrine-Ft-Hood-Shooting-Still-Not-Terrorism-Wounded-Soldiers-Get-No-Benefits

written by Cameron Jackson

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedom

email Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomaol Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedombackflip Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomgoogle Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomdigg Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomamazon Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomblogmarks Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomfacebook Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomgmail Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomread it later Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomblogger Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomreader Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomlive Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomyahoo Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomvodpod Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomtechnorati Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedomshare save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: Obama, Islamic extremists & religious freedom

Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action

Saturday, July 28th, 2012

 


FINES GREEN Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action

Obama applies disparate impact to schools. Forget intent. Just show numerical differences between groups. Obama criminalizes institutions.  

Barack Obama backs a controversial campaign by progressives to regulate schools’ disciplinary actions so that members of major racial and ethnic groups are penalized at equal rates, regardless of individuals’ behavior.

His July 26 executive order established a government panel to promote “a positive school climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools.”

“African Americans lack equal access to highly effective teachers and principals, safe schools, and challenging college-preparatory classes, and they disproportionately experience school discipline,” said the order, titled “White House Initiative On Educational Excellence.”

Because of those causes, the report suggests, “over a third of African American students do not graduate from high school on time with a regular high school diploma, and only four percent of African American high school graduates interested in college are college-ready across a range of subjects.

http://www.edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-weekly/2012/march-15/the-disparities-of-disparate-impact.html

http://www.pepperlaw.com/publications_update.aspx?ArticleKey=2299

____________________

Now let’s see this in action. Unjustly punish Joe Asian and a black thug will more likely graduate?

JAJ48@AOL.COM

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action

email Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  aol Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  backflip Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  google Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  digg Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  amazon Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  blogmarks Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  facebook Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  gmail Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  read it later Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  blogger Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  reader Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  live Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  yahoo Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  vodpod Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  technorati Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action  share save 171 16 Firenze Sage: Post racial president in action