YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CA

Saturday, March 9th, 2013

MISSING Dog:  small Yorki terrier, female, black and gray hair.

MISSING Cats;  two  males  One all gray and  other cat is  black and white.

Small reward for any information leading to the safe  return of dog & cats.

Call owner   831 713 0554.  Or leave information with the  editor of Monterey Bay Forum,  831 216 6767

ANIMAL SHELTERS:  Please be on look out for a  small Yorki, black & gray terrier.  Children distressed by loss.

 

sharebookmarx  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CA

email  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAaol  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAbackflip  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAgoogle  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAdigg  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAamazon  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAblogmarks  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAfacebook  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAgmail  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAread it later  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAblogger  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAreader  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAlive  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAyahoo  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAvodpod  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAtechnorati  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CAshare save 171 16  YORKI DOG & CATS MISSING. last seen  EL RANCHO DRIVE, SANTA CRUZ, CA

Alejo’s pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!

Sunday, February 24th, 2013
BUS Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!

Alejo’s “fix” to exempt CA bus drivers from pension reform

Santa Cruz county assemblyman  Alejo’s got it all wrong

You have it all wrong, Mr. Alejo!

We need reform of the transit system, not exemptions. We need a competitive transit system that people will use. In      Santa Cruz County, most buses are typically nearly empty. Clearly, people don’t want to ride the bus. It’s not tough to figure out why.

In San Francisco bus drivers make more than $100,000 a year. Thanks to outdated federal rules and union policies, they get these bloated salaries. Guess how many competent, unemployed people ages 18-30 would happily drive a bus for $20,000 a year? And accept benefit terms that the taxpayers can live with? Your job, Mr. Alejo, is to look out for the residents of Santa Cruz County, not the unions.

Cameron Jackson, Santa Cruz

http://www.santacruzsentiinel

sharebookmarx Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!

email Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!aol Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!backflip Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!google Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!digg Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!amazon Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!blogmarks Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!facebook Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!gmail Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!read it later Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!blogger Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!reader Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!live Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!yahoo Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!vodpod Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!technorati Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!share save 171 16 Alejos  pro union pension exemption bill bad news for taxpayers!

Firenze Sage: Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law in CA]

Sunday, July 15th, 2012
FOIS GRAS PRETTY Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]

foie gras sold on federal land gets around CA law?

 

Love foie gras?

Made illegal by CA law, one restaurant in San Francisco  located on federal law questions legality of state law.

Experts can’t agree on whether a restaurant located on federal land in California can legally subvert a new state law banning the sale of foie gras.

Evan Lee, a professor at UC Hastings College of Law who specializes in constitutional and criminal law, said there is nothing simple about federal exemption in the case of foie gras.
“So far, there is nothing I can find that makes it explicit,” he said.
“There’s no doubt there is something magical about being on federal land. But you still need Congress to sprinkle its fairy dust.
____________________

 Thank you professor, but do you really think you should be paid for this explication?   Of course you do. You’re   a lawyer. 

JAJ48@aol.com    [attorney at law in CA]

In San Francisco a restaurant  that served foie gras after the CA law:

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/lifestyle/07/16/12/san-francisco-restaurant-defies-californias-foie-gras-ban

Some restaurants in CA are providing foie gras free:

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-06-26/california-foie-gras-fans-seek-to-duck-curb-as-ban-begins

 

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]

email Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]aol Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]backflip Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]google Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]digg Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]amazon Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]blogmarks Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]facebook Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]gmail Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]read it later Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]blogger Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]reader Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]live Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]yahoo Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]vodpod Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]technorati Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]share save 171 16 Firenze Sage:  Fairy Dust Law [foie gras law  in CA]

Aptos Psychologist: Slay the Trojan horse of Obama-Care! Join or start a Tea Party in CA.

Monday, June 25th, 2012
Trojan Horse 300x240 Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.

How to slay the Trojan horse of Obama-Care through Tea Party methods

You  want to help get rid of Obama and Obama-Care?  And live in California?   Here’s how.

If you answer YES to the following then a California Tea Party might be the right tonic for you!

Do you say YES, you want Obama and Obama-Care gone? YES, you are tired of the Blame Game that Bush did it? YES, you think it gauche of Obama to ask people to send money to the Obamas instead of spend it on wedding gifts? [Do send plenty of gravy boats to the Obamas to get the message across.]

Do you say YES, you are you for fiscal responsibility and limited government? YES, you think that free markets work?

And – this is very important — Do you pick up your own litter? And expect others to pick up theirs? Are you willing to listen –and then stand your ground?

If you can say YES to all these questions then look around for a California Tea Party to join. Or start one yourself.

Recently, June 22 and 23 a whole bunch of California Tea Party groups got together in Fresno, CA. And they had a blast!

Lots of stuff got discussed. People got acquainted. It was run with a bottom to top approach and no top down heavy approach. Speakers offered ideas, methods and apps how to build a better mouse trap, i.e., how to build better political organizations.

About 50-60 persons attended the Fresno Tea Party get together. Other groups, such as Defend Rural America, also presented strategies, tactics and long term plans how to change America from the grass roots up.

One strategy suggested: As CA is expected to go for Obama, it makes sense to walk in Nevada and Arizona to help get the conservative vote out. Caravans of cars and how and when details were hammered out.

Lots of people oppose High-Speed Rail: Coming to CA to help in the anti-High Speed rail campaign are individuals who successfully took on and defeated the Endangered Species Act in Texas. Success in one campaign may spill over to other campaigns.

The Real Story why Scott Walker won: The story told is that a wealthy conservative for 16 years supported one individual to create the environment for Scott Walker’s policies to be successful. The combination of money, time and plenty of doing what is right came together to create an environment where Walker could win. That person is now a top advisor to Scott Walker. And who might that be?

So, if you are interested in constructive change made at the grass roots level and you want a bottom to top approach as to how decisions are made — look around for a near by California Tea Party.

Or start your own tea party. You will find that other California Tea Party will reach out and help you build a better mouse trap political organization to catch those critters that have wrecked havoc in America.

Several contact links are listed below:
California Tea Party Groups: We are a large coalition of tea party groups that are making a difference in our Golden State. Brad Roltgen and Dawn Wildman are the State Coordinators for Tea Party Patriots and they help facilitate this coalition.

www.californiateapartygroups.org/

www.teapartypatriots.org/groups/los-banos-tea-party-patriots/

teapartypatriotsofmontereycounty.com/

Written by Cameorn Jackson DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

P.S.   Cameron Jackson welcomes tea party persons residing in Santa Cruz County who can attend a meeting in Aptos, CA.  Send email to DrCameronJackson@gmail.com 

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.

email Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.aol Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.backflip Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.google Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.digg Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.amazon Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.blogmarks Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.facebook Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.gmail Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.read it later Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.blogger Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.reader Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.live Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.yahoo Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.vodpod Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.technorati Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.share save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist:  Slay the Trojan horse of Obama Care!   Join or start a Tea Party in CA.

Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees – the true “1%”

Sunday, May 20th, 2012
RETIREMENT Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%

government union pays $65 K a year compared to $15 K for private sector Social Security

The average public sector retiree gets $65 K a year compared to the average private sector social security benefit of $15 K. It’s an accurate statement to say that taxpayers are enslaved to the public sector unions and why collective bargaining by government employees must be limited. See article that appeared on the web site.

Government Employees – The True “1%”
By Wayne Allen Root, on March 6th, 2012

Editor’s Note: The claims made in this commentary by Wayne Allen Root are incendiary. But they are true. We are on track in the United States to pay more money to 20 million public sector retirees – at an average pension of $65,000 we will pay these retirees $1.3 trillion per year, then we will be paying in social security to 80 million private sector retirees – at an average social security benefit of $15,000 per year that will cost less, about $1.2 trillion per year. Providing a level of retirement security to government workers that only the wealthiest 1% can enjoy in the private sector is not “protecting the middle class,” it is economic enslavement by government unions over the taxpayer. This article originally appeared on FoxNews.com and is republished with permission by the author.

How did America become broke and insolvent? How did we build up an unimaginable $115 trillion in debt and unfunded liabilities? How did we allow the American Dream to become a nightmare?

All we need do is look at the primary demand the Eurozone and IMF are placing on hopelessly bankrupt Greece to get their new $170 Billion bailout — Greece has agreed to cut 150,000 government employees. Even Cuba’s leader Raul Castro recognizes too many government employees are at the root of economic destruction, as he is cutting over 2 million of them to save Cuba from bankruptcy.

The truth is that government employees are the true 1%. We have far too many of them (21 million), many of them are paid too much, and their union demands are straining taxpayers to the breaking point.

They have become a privileged class that expects to be treated superior to the taxpayers — the same folks who pay their salaries and pensions. But it is their obscene pensions that are the big problem moving forward for America.

How would you like to retire with $6 million? $8 million? $10 million? All you have to do is become a government employee to hit the jackpot.

You don’t believe me? Do the math.

I recently talked with a retired New York City toll taker. His salary averaged about $70,000 per year over 20 years. But in his last few years he worked loads of overtime and added in accumulated sick days to get his salary in those final years up to $150,000.

His pension is based on his final years’ salary. This is a common pension-padding ploy.

He bragged that he will now get a taxpayer funded pension of $120,000 a year for the rest of his life. He’s only 50 years old.

The average 50-year old male has a life expectancy of almost 80. With automatic cost of living increases, that’s a bill to taxpayers of $5 million for the next 30 years –for not working. THREE TIMES WHAT HE EARNED WHILE WORKING.

And, of course, we’re also paying his medical bills.

No country, no budget, and no taxpayers anywhere in the world can afford this. Ask Greece.

But here’s a frightening question- what if he lives to 90? Or 100? His pension could rise to $8 million or higher.

Multiply this times 21 million government employees (on the federal, state and local level) and you now get a sense of what is bankrupting America.

Are these stories the exception, rather than the rule? Over 77,000 federal government employees earned more than the governor of their state.

On the federal level, it was just reported by USA Today that the average federal civil servant compensation is $123,049 per year.

That’s more than double what private sector workers earn (average of $61,051). Since 2000, federal government employee compensation has grown by 36.9% versus 8.8% for private sector employees.

In Las Vegas (Clark County) the average firefighter earns $199,678 per year.

When he retires at age 45 or 50, we owe his pension based on that obscene salary. But here’s the clincher –when he finally dies, the taxpayer has to continue paying the pension to his spouse. Add up the damage to the economy. It is catastrophic. Talk about a 1 per center — a single firefighter could retire with $8 to $10 million for not working for the rest of his life.

This is madness.

Now it’s true that policemen and firefighters are heroes. But they make up a small portion of government employees.

Recent studies prove the average janitor that works for government makes over $600,000 more in his career than a private sector janitor. Are janitors heroes too?

Again, this is madness.

Three stories on the same day in this past Sunday’s Las Vegas newspapers sum up this national outrage.

Let’s start with the Las Vegas teachers union. It was reported that more than a third of the union’s entire $4.1 million annual budget went to pay just nine union leaders.

The Teachers Union Executive Director received $632,546, while the CEO of the union-created Teachers Health Trust was paid $546,133.

So next time you hear educators scream that we must spend more money on education, because “it’s for the kids,” you’ll know the truth. It’s for the unions.

It’s always been for the unions.

Bernie Madoff has nothing on the government employee union scam.

Article number two in Sunday’s Las Vegas Review Journal was about those highly paid Las Vegas firefighters.

It turns out they weren’t satisfied with making almost $200,000 per year. They also abused sick leave, rigged work schedules to pump up their pensions, and appear to have engaged in widespread disability fraud.

About half of all Clark County firefighters retired with work-related injuries in recent years- garnering bonus payments averaging $320,000 apiece. That’s in addition to their obscene pensions for life.

Is this also “for the kids?”

Article number three in Sunday’s paper was about a now retired Las Vegas homicide detective and possible police brutality. It had nothing to do with pensions. But interestingly, the retired homicide detective they quote in the story is 47 years old.

He’s 47 and already retired?

Want to bet that you and I are on the hook for $5 to $10 million in pension and health benefits from now until the day he dies- for not working. Is this also “for the kids?”

I’ll say it one more time… this is madness.

These aren’t CEO types. These are average government employees retiring with the equivalent of $5 to $10 million. These are the true 1% privileged class that are bankrupting our country and destroying the once great U.S. economy.

Something is very wrong here.

No one has a right to complain about the high incomes of business owners in the private sector (the 1%). We rarely have pensions and our compensation doesn’t cost taxpayers a dime. We risk our own money to start our businesses and often work 16 hour days, weekends and holidays.

Yet for all that risk and hard work, do you know any small business owners who retire with $5 to $10 million? They are few and far between. But that’s exactly what a private sector employee would need in the bank on the day of his or her retirement to match the $100,000 per year pensions (plus health care benefits and cost of living increases) of government employees paid out over 30 to 50 years.

Keep in mind that government employees never risk a dollar of their own money. They have lifetime job security. And they rarely work beyond 9 to 5, let alone weekends or holidays.

Yet government employees are paid millions by taxpayers to retire early, often on pensions fattened by gaming the corrupt system.

They are the true 1%.

This is a national disgrace that is bankrupting America. The gall of this scam would make Bernie Madoff blush.

But hey…”It’s for the kids!”

Wayne Allyn Root is a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee. He now serves as Chairman of the Libertarian National Congressional Committee. He is the best-selling author of “The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gold & Tax Cuts.” His web site: www.ROOTforAmerica.com. This article originally appeared on FoxNews.com and is republished with permission from the author.

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%

email Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%aol Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%backflip Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%google Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%digg Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%amazon Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%blogmarks Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%facebook Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%gmail Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%read it later Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%blogger Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%reader Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%live Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%yahoo Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%vodpod Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%technorati Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%share save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%

Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]

Thursday, May 10th, 2012
HOUSE UNDERWATER Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]

free money to the undeserving

In a big change, the state-run Keep Your Home California program will use federal money to reduce an eligible homeowner’s mortgage balance by up to $100,000 without requiring a matching reduction by the bank servicing the loan.

Many more underwater California homeowners will get principal reductions when the change takes effect in early June, but there’s a catch: The reduction is structured as a forgivable loan. If they sell their house within five years, any profit will go toward repaying the principal reduction. After five years, there is no repayment requirement. Under current rules, the loan is forgiven after three years.

Loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are potentially eligible for principal reduction under this program.

The money is coming from a $2 billion grant the state was awarded in 2010 from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Hardest Hit Fund. The grant provides four types of assistance to low- and moderate-income homeowners who can document a financial hardship.

To qualify under the new rules, homeowners must use the home as their primary residence, owe more than it’s worth, fall below the income limit for their county, demonstrate a financial hardship and owe no more than $729,750 on a first mortgage originated on or before Jan. 1, 2010. (The previous cutoff date was Jan. 1, 2009.)

In San Francisco the household income limit is $121,900. For other counties see keepyourhomecalifornia.org/files/income.pdf.

_______________

This is simply outrageous. If in San Francisco you make $121,901, you have the privilege and honor to pay taxes so the federal government can turn money over to the state government(forget all the carrying charges here and there) to give your neighbor who overextended himself or lied on his loan application a gift of $100,000. This is fair?

JAJ48@aol.com http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/109312

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]

email Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]aol Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]backflip Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]google Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]digg Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]amazon Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]blogmarks Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]facebook Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]gmail Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]read it later Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]blogger Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]reader Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]live Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]yahoo Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]vodpod Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]technorati Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]share save 171 16 Firenze Sage: Free money to the undeserving [100 K principal reductions for CA homes]

Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents’ ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway …

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

WE ARE THE 99 300x154 Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...

Aptos, CA ire at Safeway expansion in Rancho del Mar which wipes out many small businesses


Big Business Safeway — part of the 1% — has money, clout, connections & pays top dollar for management. Safeway paid its’ CEO $11 million in 2011.

Any CEO such as Safeway’s who is paid $11 million
must be worth that much to the company probably knows who to talk to and which campaigns to contribute to concerning the upcoming election for 2nd District.

So, will Safeway readily get the necessary Santa Cruz County governmental approvals to drastically alter the Rancho del Mar shopping center?

The next Santa Cruz County supervisor for 2nd district — which includes Aptos & enviorns — will be …?

Why not ask Safeway’s representative to attend the meeting
to introduce possible 2nd District Supervisors May 7 at the Rio Sands Motel? And of course invite all the small businesses which will be eliminated per Safeway’s plans. Great opportunity for all “stake holders” to stake out their positions.

Maybe someone can get KSCO 1080 to put it on the radio live so those who cannot attend could get a few questions in as well? written by drcameronjackson@gmail.com
_______________
Candidate opinions on Safeway sought
An open letter to the five candidates vying in June for 2nd District supervisor: Aptos’ own 99 percent need to know where each of you stands regarding 1 percent Safeway’s planned destruction of over half of the locally owned businesses of Rancho del Mar Shopping Center in Aptos. Details, please. No more generic statements as in the Voter’s Information Pamphlet nor your various “town meetings.” We are looking forward to reading your responses, Daniel Beckett, Doug Deitch, Zach Friend, Rich McInnis and Antonio Rivas.

Letter to Santa Cruz Sentinel, April 29, 2012 written by C. A. Dyer, Aptos

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...

email Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...aol Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...backflip Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...google Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...digg Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...amazon Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...blogmarks Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...facebook Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...gmail Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...read it later Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...blogger Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...reader Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...live Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...yahoo Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...vodpod Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...technorati Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...share save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: the 99% Aptos, CA residents ire towards 1% Big Business Safeway ...

Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway to double in size in Aptos, CA]

Thursday, April 5th, 2012

GROCERY STORE 300x146 Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]

Safeway in Aptos, CA plans to double in size


GROCERY222 Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]

why Safeway to double?


Big box Safeway plans to double in size from 30,000 to 60,000 square feet at their Aptos, CA store located in Rancho del Mar shopping center just off #1 at State Park Drive.

Why? Bigger is not better for the existing Aptos, CA community.

Safeway recently bought the entire Rancho del Mar shopping center.

There’s plenty of parking now and no need for a double decker parking garage. The Rancho del Mar center has the only movie theater and the only ACE hardware store between Watsonville [9 miles south] and 41st Avenue in Capitola [3 miles north] Both the theater and ACE hardware will be eliminated if Safeway expands as planned. As local Aptos users know, ACE is the place for excellent services from the time you enter the door.

It’s likely that many small businesses [a movie theater, a jewelery store, a pharmacy, several restaurants, Ace hardware] will be eliminated if and when Safeway expands from 30,000 to 60,000 square feet.

Susan Houghton is a contact person for Safeway. Per Houghton, it will take about 2 years to get permits and 2 years to build. Several letters to the editor of the Santa Cruz Sentinel express concern about the pending changes.

Where and how to speak up: Aptos, CA has a supervisor on the County of Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors. And there’s of course the Planning Department. Is there a disgruntled citizens department? You can subscribe to the RSS feed to get updates to this post.

written by DrCameronJackson@gmail.com
_______________

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]

email Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]aol Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]backflip Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]google Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]digg Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]amazon Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]blogmarks Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]facebook Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]gmail Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]read it later Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]blogger Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]reader Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]live Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]yahoo Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]vodpod Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]technorati Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]share save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: Bigger is not better [Safeway  to double in size in Aptos, CA]

Aptos Psychologist: Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young children

Wednesday, February 29th, 2012

BABY SIX Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young children

six months


Hearing loss in babies has huge effects on their general development: hearing loss impacts language acquisition, speech, psycho-social well being and overall learning.

Research shows that the critical time to stimulate the auditory and brain pathways is during the first six (6) months of your child’s life. So pay particular attention during your child’s first six months that he or she continues to hear normally.

The good news is that children with all degrees of hearing loss — who receive appropriate interventions prior to 6 months of age– can obtain speech and language skills comparable to their normal hearing peers when age 3 years.

What parents can do:
Check and re-check that your baby’s hearing remains normal. Visit your pediatrician for screenings as your doctor recommends. Research recommends hearing screening every 2 months until age one year — and every three months until age two.

Keep this in mind:
Even mild hearing loss can significantly interfere with the reception of spoken language and educational performance. Research shows that children with one ear hearing loss are ten (10) times as likely to be held back at least one year compared to children with normal hearing.

Many children are affected with ear infections:
Chronic otis media (ear infections) affects 5 – 30% of children age 6 to 11 years and can persist 4 – 5 months with or without medical interventions.

Watch for possible symptoms of hearing and ear problems. Does your child: Tug at his/her ear; turn side of head towards parent; appear inattentive; strain when listening; make frequent mistakes following directions; day dreams; tend to isolate; tire easily; talk too loudly or too softly; have a speech problem; appear passive.

Does your child appear to have pain in their ear? Do you see redness or drainage from the ear?

Methods to assess for hearing loss in young children:


Otoacoustic Emissions Technology (OAE)

OAE hearing Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young children

OAE


Otoacoustic Emissions is a hearing test that uses a small probe inserted into the external ear to introduce a sound stimulus (series of beeps) and measures the response sound, like an echo, emitted by the inner ear (cochlea) of a normal hearing person. The cochlea of a person with a hearing loss greater than 25-30 dB does not emit a sound in response to a sound stimulus.

Many studies have shown that screening children 0 – 3 years of age may be beneficial with OAEs. The OAE technology is very good for children who are unable to respond to a sound by raising their hand or dropping a toy in a bucket to indicate a response to the stimulus.

Children with developmental delays [possible autistic spectrum issues, possible intellectual disability] may not understand or often refuse to follow simple directions. OAE may be a useful screening for children with developmental delays.

Note that OAE may not detect mild hearing loss (20 dB to 40 dB) which may affect performance in school. The gold standard for screening children over age three is with a pure tone audiometer conducted by properly trained personnel.

To summarize: Parents can greatly reduce possible hearing loss in babies and young children with appropriate interventions. Know why its so important that children hear normally. Get medical attention immediately when young children appear to have difficulties with hearing normally.

Take children for routine screenings every 2 months during first year or as your pediatrician recommends. Watch for signs of possible ear infection and behaviors that indicate difficulties with hearing. Knowledge, parent involvement and appropriate medical interventions to improve hearing are particularly crucial during your child’s first six months. Parents can do a lot to reduce hearing loss in babies and young children.

In CA, children with developmental delays are typically referred for Early Start services. Early Start services are provided through the government from birth until the child turns three years old.

Roughly 70% of the children referred for Early Start services in CA are due to speech delays.

And, a very important medical questions is: Can this child hear normally? If a child applying for Early Start services cannot hear normally different medical interventions are needed to address hearing loss.

In Santa Cruz County assessment for Early Start services is done via various vendors. These vendors provide assessment reports concerning the overall development of the child/ applicant for Early Start services.

Whether or not the applicant for Early Start services can hear normally is vital to determining the appropriate kind of services to provide to the child.

Any parent who applies for Early Start services in Santa Cruz County should check with the vendor and whoever receives the assessment report and inquire about their child’s hearing abilities. Was the child’s hearing abilities screened? Can the child hear normally? And if the child does not hear normally, what appropriate medical services are recommended?

Remember the first sentences of this post: Hearing loss in young babies has profound effects on the general development of a child. And, parents can help in many ways so that their child hears and develops normally.

written by DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young children

email Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenaol Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenbackflip Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrengoogle Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrendigg Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenamazon Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenblogmarks Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenfacebook Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrengmail Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenread it later Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenblogger Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenreader Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenlive Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenyahoo Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenvodpod Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrentechnorati Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young childrenshare save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist:  Why crucial & how parents can reduce hearing loss in babies & young children

Firenze Sage: Get out of the closet now! [CA judges must]

Saturday, February 25th, 2012
CLOSET22 Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]

CA judges must

In order to make sure gays and lesbians are adequately represented on the judicial bench, the state of California is requiring all judges and justices to reveal their sexual orientation.

The announcement was made in an internal memo sent to all California judges and justices.
_______________

So in the name of “fairness” we invade people’s privacy. Where does this stop. CLOSET1 Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]
jaj48@aol.com

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]

email Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]aol Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]backflip Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]google Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]digg Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]amazon Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]blogmarks Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]facebook Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]gmail Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]read it later Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]blogger Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]reader Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]live Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]yahoo Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]vodpod Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]technorati Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]share save 171 16 Firenze Sage:  Get out of the closet now!  [CA judges must]