Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?

Monday, April 4th, 2011

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

A woman recently wrote poignantly, Put my disabled son on Death’s Row in San Quintin and he will get three square meals, medical care and perhaps even a room with a view… The woman wrote in response to the proposed $568.6 million cut in money allocated for the 246,000 disabled in California served under the Lanterman Act.

The woman’s feelings are understandable given that it costs taxpayers $50 to 70 K per inmate in CA prison compared to the cost to care for each disabled person. Run the math ($4 billion in CA budget allocated last year divided by 246,000 disabled persons equals $16,260 spent per disabled person).

Maybe it’s time to put the family of each disabled person served by CA regional centers in the driver’s seat. Why not have vouchers that follow each disabled person — akin to school vouchers — that give families choice? That way people will become knowledgeable as what things cost and more empowered by making the choices they think best. (more…)

sharebookmarx Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?

email Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  aol Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  backflip Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  google Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  digg Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  amazon Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  blogmarks Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  facebook Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  gmail Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  read it later Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  blogger Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  reader Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  live Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  yahoo Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  vodpod Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  technorati Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?  share save 171 16 Vouchers of $16 K for each disabled person served under Lanterman?

What is BROKE California going…

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

What is BROKE California going to do? How is the legislature going to make a realistic budget with no decent projections of income? Make cuts across the board is best solution. Question: how to best keep a pulse on what is happening in Sacramento? Wish I knew.

sharebookmarx What is BROKE California going...

email What is BROKE California going...aol What is BROKE California going...backflip What is BROKE California going...google What is BROKE California going...digg What is BROKE California going...amazon What is BROKE California going...blogmarks What is BROKE California going...facebook What is BROKE California going...gmail What is BROKE California going...read it later What is BROKE California going...blogger What is BROKE California going...reader What is BROKE California going...live What is BROKE California going...yahoo What is BROKE California going...vodpod What is BROKE California going...technorati What is BROKE California going...share save 171 16 What is BROKE California going...

Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.

Sunday, May 3rd, 2009

Vote YES on IA if you want 2 EXTRA years of actual income, sales and vehicle tax increases. Vote NO on IA if you believe the legislative analyst – who says the measure is incomprehensible.

Vote YES on IB if you want a multi-billion increase in education spending. Vote NO on IB if you dislike the grip of unions on government. In California, 57 percent of government workers are unionized compared to 37 percent nationally. CA teachers make 25 % more than elsewhere and are highest paid in nation.

Vote YES on IC
if you want more people buying CA lottery tickets. Vote NO in IC if concerned about the poor – who overwhelmingly buy the bulk of all lottery tickets. Vote NO if gambling money away is particularly bad during these economic times.

Vote YES on ID which grabs the tobacco money. Vote NO on ID because that tobacco money currently is dedicated to children’s services which you do not want cut.

Vote YES on IE which takes the so-called millionaire tax money. Vote NO on IE because that money is currently dedicated to health services. Vote NO because The biggest cut in Santa Cruz County will be the health services. Vote NO because swine flu, T.B and other infectious diseases must be kept in check.

sharebookmarx Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.

email Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.aol Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.backflip Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.google Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.digg Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.amazon Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.blogmarks Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.facebook Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.gmail Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.read it later Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.blogger Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.reader Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.live Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.yahoo Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.vodpod Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.technorati Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.share save 171 16 Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.