Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]

Friday, October 14th, 2011

FREE TRADE Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]

Congress passes free-trade agreements


The recently passed trade agreements with Korea, Columbia and Panama never would have passed if Nancy Pelosi’s Democrats still ran the House.

It was because of Pelosi and her Democrats (she held a tight rein) that the trade agreements did not passs in Mr. Obama’s first two years.

Look at the numbers: The House approved the deals with South Korea 278 to 151, Columbia 262 to 167 and Panama 300 to 129. Respectively, 86%, 94% and 95% of the nay votes came from Democrats.

What America has in exceeding abundance is the genius of Steve Jobs to create new products that the world will come running for. It’s time to break down those (protectionist) walls and let freedom ring.

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

sharebookmarx Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]

email Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]aol Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]backflip Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]google Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]digg Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]amazon Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]blogmarks Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]facebook Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]gmail Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]read it later Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]blogger Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]reader Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]live Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]yahoo Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]vodpod Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]technorati Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]share save 171 16 Aptos psychologist: freedom wins over protectionism [trade agreements with Korea, Panama & Columbia]

Dear Rep. Sam Farr: Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not “change” we want.

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

Dear House Representative Sam Farr,

health care rally 150x150 Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.

Health Care Rally

I listened to the Town Meetings which  you held.  You were adamantly for a  government option, Single Payer plan.  You did not listen to the folks who want to keep their own health plan and  do not want more government control.  You kept saying “oh, you can keep your plan …” (more…)

sharebookmarx Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.

email Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  aol Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  backflip Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  google Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  digg Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  amazon Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  blogmarks Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  facebook Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  gmail Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  read it later Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  blogger Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  reader Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  live Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  yahoo Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  vodpod Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  technorati Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.  share save 171 16 Dear  Rep. Sam Farr:  Turning over 1/6th of the economy to BIG government is not change we want.

Jobs bill axed by Democrats

Friday, February 12th, 2010

The article below is from the Drudge report:

WASHINGTON (AP) – “Senate Democrats scrapped a bipartisan jobs bill in favor of one they say is leaner and focused solely on putting Americans back to work, and they’re all but daring Republicans to vote against it.

The new, stripped-down proposal followed criticism that the bipartisan version wouldn’t create many jobs.

The switch brought sharp accusations of reneging from Republicans who thought they had a deal, jeopardizing a brief attempt at bipartisan lawmaking.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s latest bill focuses on several popular provisions aimed at boosting job creation, including a new tax break negotiated with Republicans for companies that hire unemployed workers and for small businesses that purchase new equipment. It also would renew highway programs and help states and local governments finance large infrastructure projects.

Reid, D-Nev., put forward the pared-back plan after Senate Democrats balked at a broader bill stuffed with unrelated provisions sought by lobbyists for business groups and doctors. The surprise blew apart an agreement with key Republicans like Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who worked with Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., for weeks to produce a bill containing the extra provisions.

The original bill had won support from across the political spectrum, from President Barack Obama as well as conservative Republicans in the Senate, offering the promise of a rare bipartisan package in a Congress that has been gripped by partisan fights. To get that support, however, the package had morphed into a 361-page grab bag of provisions that included extending benefits to the unemployed and tax breaks for businesses.
Now, the bipartisan agreement is off.

“Our side isn’t sure that the Republicans are real interested in developing good policy and to move forward together,” said Sen. Thomas Carper, D-Del. “Instead, they are more inclined to play rope-a-dope again. My own view is, let’s test them.”

Said Reid: “Republicans are going to have to make a choice. I don’t know in logic what they could say to oppose this.”

Reid officially put the measure before the Senate on Thursday evening, setting up a key test vote when the chamber returns the week of Feb. 22. He’ll need at least one GOP vote to prevail in a filibuster challenge.

Republicans said they were blind-sided by Reid’s about-face.

Grassley spokeswoman Jill Kozeny said in an e-mail that Reid “pulled the rug out from work to build broad-based support for tax relief and other efforts to help the private sector recover from the economic crisis.”

The bigger bill got a decidedly mixed reception at a luncheon meeting of Democrats, many of whom were uncomfortable with supporting a bill containing so many provisions unrelated to creating jobs, including loans for chicken producers and aid to catfish farmers.

The provisions also included a $31 billion package of tax breaks for individuals and businesses, an extension of several parts of the USA Patriot Act and higher payments for doctors facing Medicare payment cuts.

The surprise move appears to insulate Democrats from criticism that greeted the earlier, lobbyist-backed legislation first leaked on Tuesday and officially unveiled by Baucus and Grassley – to praise from the White House – only hours before Reid’s announcement.

The centerpiece of Reid’s new bill is a $13 billion payroll tax credit for companies that hire unemployed workers. The idea, by Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, would exempt businesses hiring unemployed workers in 2010 from the 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax for those hires.It also would provide an additional $1,000 tax credit for workers retained for a full year and deposit an additional $20 billion into the federal highway trust fund – money that would have to be borrowed. There’s also $2 billion to subsidize bond issues by state and local governments for large infrastructure projects

But Republicans are irate at the tactics and said Reid had gone back on a deal reached with some of the Senate’s heaviest hitters, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

sharebookmarx Jobs bill axed by Democrats

email Jobs bill axed by Democratsaol Jobs bill axed by Democratsbackflip Jobs bill axed by Democratsgoogle Jobs bill axed by Democratsdigg Jobs bill axed by Democratsamazon Jobs bill axed by Democratsblogmarks Jobs bill axed by Democratsfacebook Jobs bill axed by Democratsgmail Jobs bill axed by Democratsread it later Jobs bill axed by Democratsblogger Jobs bill axed by Democratsreader Jobs bill axed by Democratslive Jobs bill axed by Democratsyahoo Jobs bill axed by Democratsvodpod Jobs bill axed by Democratstechnorati Jobs bill axed by Democratsshare save 171 16 Jobs bill axed by Democrats