Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees – the true “1%”

Sunday, May 20th, 2012
RETIREMENT Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%

government union pays $65 K a year compared to $15 K for private sector Social Security

The average public sector retiree gets $65 K a year compared to the average private sector social security benefit of $15 K. It’s an accurate statement to say that taxpayers are enslaved to the public sector unions and why collective bargaining by government employees must be limited. See article that appeared on the web site.

Government Employees – The True “1%”
By Wayne Allen Root, on March 6th, 2012

Editor’s Note: The claims made in this commentary by Wayne Allen Root are incendiary. But they are true. We are on track in the United States to pay more money to 20 million public sector retirees – at an average pension of $65,000 we will pay these retirees $1.3 trillion per year, then we will be paying in social security to 80 million private sector retirees – at an average social security benefit of $15,000 per year that will cost less, about $1.2 trillion per year. Providing a level of retirement security to government workers that only the wealthiest 1% can enjoy in the private sector is not “protecting the middle class,” it is economic enslavement by government unions over the taxpayer. This article originally appeared on FoxNews.com and is republished with permission by the author.

How did America become broke and insolvent? How did we build up an unimaginable $115 trillion in debt and unfunded liabilities? How did we allow the American Dream to become a nightmare?

All we need do is look at the primary demand the Eurozone and IMF are placing on hopelessly bankrupt Greece to get their new $170 Billion bailout — Greece has agreed to cut 150,000 government employees. Even Cuba’s leader Raul Castro recognizes too many government employees are at the root of economic destruction, as he is cutting over 2 million of them to save Cuba from bankruptcy.

The truth is that government employees are the true 1%. We have far too many of them (21 million), many of them are paid too much, and their union demands are straining taxpayers to the breaking point.

They have become a privileged class that expects to be treated superior to the taxpayers — the same folks who pay their salaries and pensions. But it is their obscene pensions that are the big problem moving forward for America.

How would you like to retire with $6 million? $8 million? $10 million? All you have to do is become a government employee to hit the jackpot.

You don’t believe me? Do the math.

I recently talked with a retired New York City toll taker. His salary averaged about $70,000 per year over 20 years. But in his last few years he worked loads of overtime and added in accumulated sick days to get his salary in those final years up to $150,000.

His pension is based on his final years’ salary. This is a common pension-padding ploy.

He bragged that he will now get a taxpayer funded pension of $120,000 a year for the rest of his life. He’s only 50 years old.

The average 50-year old male has a life expectancy of almost 80. With automatic cost of living increases, that’s a bill to taxpayers of $5 million for the next 30 years –for not working. THREE TIMES WHAT HE EARNED WHILE WORKING.

And, of course, we’re also paying his medical bills.

No country, no budget, and no taxpayers anywhere in the world can afford this. Ask Greece.

But here’s a frightening question- what if he lives to 90? Or 100? His pension could rise to $8 million or higher.

Multiply this times 21 million government employees (on the federal, state and local level) and you now get a sense of what is bankrupting America.

Are these stories the exception, rather than the rule? Over 77,000 federal government employees earned more than the governor of their state.

On the federal level, it was just reported by USA Today that the average federal civil servant compensation is $123,049 per year.

That’s more than double what private sector workers earn (average of $61,051). Since 2000, federal government employee compensation has grown by 36.9% versus 8.8% for private sector employees.

In Las Vegas (Clark County) the average firefighter earns $199,678 per year.

When he retires at age 45 or 50, we owe his pension based on that obscene salary. But here’s the clincher –when he finally dies, the taxpayer has to continue paying the pension to his spouse. Add up the damage to the economy. It is catastrophic. Talk about a 1 per center — a single firefighter could retire with $8 to $10 million for not working for the rest of his life.

This is madness.

Now it’s true that policemen and firefighters are heroes. But they make up a small portion of government employees.

Recent studies prove the average janitor that works for government makes over $600,000 more in his career than a private sector janitor. Are janitors heroes too?

Again, this is madness.

Three stories on the same day in this past Sunday’s Las Vegas newspapers sum up this national outrage.

Let’s start with the Las Vegas teachers union. It was reported that more than a third of the union’s entire $4.1 million annual budget went to pay just nine union leaders.

The Teachers Union Executive Director received $632,546, while the CEO of the union-created Teachers Health Trust was paid $546,133.

So next time you hear educators scream that we must spend more money on education, because “it’s for the kids,” you’ll know the truth. It’s for the unions.

It’s always been for the unions.

Bernie Madoff has nothing on the government employee union scam.

Article number two in Sunday’s Las Vegas Review Journal was about those highly paid Las Vegas firefighters.

It turns out they weren’t satisfied with making almost $200,000 per year. They also abused sick leave, rigged work schedules to pump up their pensions, and appear to have engaged in widespread disability fraud.

About half of all Clark County firefighters retired with work-related injuries in recent years- garnering bonus payments averaging $320,000 apiece. That’s in addition to their obscene pensions for life.

Is this also “for the kids?”

Article number three in Sunday’s paper was about a now retired Las Vegas homicide detective and possible police brutality. It had nothing to do with pensions. But interestingly, the retired homicide detective they quote in the story is 47 years old.

He’s 47 and already retired?

Want to bet that you and I are on the hook for $5 to $10 million in pension and health benefits from now until the day he dies- for not working. Is this also “for the kids?”

I’ll say it one more time… this is madness.

These aren’t CEO types. These are average government employees retiring with the equivalent of $5 to $10 million. These are the true 1% privileged class that are bankrupting our country and destroying the once great U.S. economy.

Something is very wrong here.

No one has a right to complain about the high incomes of business owners in the private sector (the 1%). We rarely have pensions and our compensation doesn’t cost taxpayers a dime. We risk our own money to start our businesses and often work 16 hour days, weekends and holidays.

Yet for all that risk and hard work, do you know any small business owners who retire with $5 to $10 million? They are few and far between. But that’s exactly what a private sector employee would need in the bank on the day of his or her retirement to match the $100,000 per year pensions (plus health care benefits and cost of living increases) of government employees paid out over 30 to 50 years.

Keep in mind that government employees never risk a dollar of their own money. They have lifetime job security. And they rarely work beyond 9 to 5, let alone weekends or holidays.

Yet government employees are paid millions by taxpayers to retire early, often on pensions fattened by gaming the corrupt system.

They are the true 1%.

This is a national disgrace that is bankrupting America. The gall of this scam would make Bernie Madoff blush.

But hey…”It’s for the kids!”

Wayne Allyn Root is a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee. He now serves as Chairman of the Libertarian National Congressional Committee. He is the best-selling author of “The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gold & Tax Cuts.” His web site: www.ROOTforAmerica.com. This article originally appeared on FoxNews.com and is republished with permission from the author.

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%

email Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%aol Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%backflip Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%google Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%digg Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%amazon Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%blogmarks Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%facebook Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%gmail Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%read it later Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%blogger Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%reader Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%live Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%yahoo Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%vodpod Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%technorati Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%share save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: 20 million public sector retirees    the true 1%

Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a voluntary choice a win-win for political free speech? Yes.

Thursday, May 17th, 2012

DUESjpg Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.

no more forced SEIU union dues win-win for political free speech


Let’s take the wind out of sails of the SEIU?

How? Through state legislation, stop automatic deductions of union dues from SEIU workers pay checks.

Let workers be free to choose yes or no whether to pay union dues. Many government union workers will opt out of automatic dues removed from their checks. No automatic dues flowing into the SEIU results in less political clout that they can exert.

Why should any worker just to hold a job have to pay SEIU union dues
so that the SEIU can use dues to flow into other organizations like Change to Win which seeks to intimidate private companies such as Wellpoint from making political contributions?

Look at who runs Change to Win.
The President of SEIU, the Vice President of the SEIU and the Treasurer/Secretary of the SEIU are all key players of Change to Win.

Union front organization such as Change to Win seek to know and limit the political donations made by private corporations. Why? So that the unions are the only big players in who make large donations.

The unions such as SEIU want to control the political free speech exercised by of private corporations.

The SEIU seeks to grow government unions to grow their power.

Recently, in Michigan the SEIU suffered a setback to their political clout.
In states including Michigan and California home health care workers were forced to pay union dues.

Persons with developmental disabilities are frequently cared for life long by family members.

It is good news that developmentally disabled persons can stay in their homes thanks to health care provided by parents and relatives. Those who best know and love a relative with disabilities provides care at a fraction of the cost if the person had to be placed in a government run facility.

To deem home health care workers as “government employees” and force them to pay SEIU union wrongfully categorizes people and allows the SEIU to skim off millions of dollars. Home health care workers seek to care for their loved ones — not to do a government job. Recently Michigan has changed their laws. No more taking of union dues from Michigan home health care workers.

Can California wake up and follow Michigan’s lead? Let’s hope so. The necessary labor and employment laws are already in place to protect jobs.

written by drcameronjackson@gmail.com

By: Chase Ingersoll
Home Health Care Aides not longer required to pay SEIU union dues

Posted: Apr 11, 2012

MIDLAND — Michigan’s 60,000 home health care aides will no longer be deemed government employees — meaning they cannot be forced into a government employee union and have dues withheld — as a result of legislation signed today by Gov. Rick Snyder. The next step is for the Michigan Department of Community Health to immediately stop the collection of dues from subsidy payments intended to assist developmentally disabled adults and the diversion of those funds to the Service Employees International Union, said Patrick J. Wright, director of the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation.

“Ending this lucrative charade is terrific news for Michigan’s home health care providers who have seen nearly $30 million skimmed from their payments over the last six years,” said Wright. “The designation of these private contractors and family members as government employees was illegal from the beginning. Michigan’s Constitution explicitly states that only the Legislature can define government employees. No political arrangement or interlocal agreement can change that.

“Now that the law has been clarified, the dues skim must end,” he added.

The arrangement that allowed the SEIU to skim from Medicaid payments to some of the state’s most vulnerable residents was concocted during the administration of Gov. Jennifer Granholm. An interlocal agreement between DCH and the Tri-County Aging Consortium allowed for the creation of the Michigan Quality Community Care Council, which served as the “employer” for what were really self-employed independent contractors or, overwhelmingly, family members caring for loved ones.

Despite the fact that there was no real employer with whom to engage in collective bargaining, the SEIU conducted a union representation vote in 2007. Out of the 44,000 home health care providers in Michigan at the time, only 7,900 voted; 6,900 cast ballots for the union. Although many providers were unaware that a vote was taking place, they nonetheless were forced into the union.

Government-sector unions recently proposed a constitutional amendment to circumvent this legislative fix and restore the flow of the so-called dues. Wright noted that if passed, this proposed amendment would violate the U.S. Constitution since private employee unionization is purely a matter of federal law.

This is the third time in 14 months that an illegal unionization arrangement has been brought to an end. On March 1, 2011, Gov. Snyder issued an executive order ending the illegal dues confiscation affecting tens of thousands of home-based day care providers who had been forced into a government-employee union through a similar scheme. The Mackinac Center Legal Foundation fought an 18-month court battle on behalf of day care owners.

On March 13, Gov. Snyder signed into law a bill clarifying that graduate student research assistants are not government employees subject to forced unionization. The MCLFrepresented more than 370 such students from the University of Michigan who objected to the illegal unionization effort.

“Government-sector unions are clearly trying to expand the definition of government employees in order to grow their membership and direct taxpayer money into their coffers,” said Wright. “If business owners, the self-employed, family members and students can be roped into such schemes, then grocers, doctors, landlords and anyone else who receives a direct or indirect payment from the government can’t be far behind.”

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.

email Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.aol Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.backflip Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.google Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.digg Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.amazon Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.blogmarks Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.facebook Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.gmail Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.read it later Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.blogger Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.reader Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.live Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.yahoo Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.vodpod Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.technorati Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.share save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: Make SEIU union dues a  voluntary choice  a win win for political  free speech? Yes.

An update on the Adam & Eve Story of Creation: Obama tells God ‘all good things are free’ including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains & God acts

Saturday, February 11th, 2012

And on the Seventh Day after resting a while, God heard Barack Obama talking from afar to his foot soldiers in the Trojan Horse:

Trojan Horse3 300x240 An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

All must comply

Come forth! All must comply! Go faithful soldiers at night to all hospitals, charities and faiths. Enforce what my servant HHS Sebelius says …

EAGLEjpg An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

Isaiah 40:31 Wings like eagles

And God told Obama, Come hither, Barack O, and speak to to Me of your new Rule while I rest on the Seventh Day.

Remember, Barack O, the words I spoke to Man: Go forth and multiply.

Do not bend My Words to your desires, Barack O. Now, what is this new Rule you’ve imposed?

And Barack O said, Lord, This is my new Obama-Care Rule:

All things good are free. And all Technology is free which prevents Woman from bearing Child as pregnancy might threaten Woman’s life. And, all Women have a Right to say ‘no children’ and still enjoy the pleasure of husband, lover, friend or acquaintance.

And now, Lord, I go to write this Law for your people to follow.

Adam, hiding behind the Tree of Life,

TREE OF LIFE An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

Bibical Tree of LIfe

overheard the conversation between God and Barack O. With fear and trembling after Barack O left, Adam approached God and said: Oh Lord, you have given me Woman and I am no longer alone. But what if Woman does not wants Child — and I do? How can I protect Child? And what if Child is not of my seed as I have not touched Woman?

And God said, Adam as first Man, I gave you freedom to choose. As a guide you have Joseph who protected Mary with child when he had not yet touched her. And Man said, Yes Lord, I will protect if there is a growing child to protect.

But Lord, is it fair that Woman has a Right to say ‘no Child’ and pay zero for the Technology which prevents or kills Child in her womb — and I do not have similar Rights? Barack O’s new Rule gives all power to Woman and leaves Man and Child with no power.

And Adam continued: Lord, Barack O’s new Rule injures Man and all Men. As all Men are injured we seek protection. To what authority or what court can Man go to oppose Barack O’s new Mandate? Lord, can we sue for standing?

And God replied to Man, I will think on these things. And I will think about Child’s Rights and Man’s Rights. Woman’s Rights must not overcome the Rights of Man or Child.

There must be some balancing of powers, said God. If Man is akin to the executive. And if Woman with her husband oversees the Purse of Money …. Mmmmm. And Child does need some protections… And God said, I will consult my legal scholar sons, Scalia and Roberts.

And God said, Perhaps Man, if you are injured by Barack O’s new Rule, you can go to a Court of Law and sue for standing.

Supreme Court An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

Sue for standing as injured party

And Adam said, Oh Lord, please read Wealth of Nations written by my brother Adam Smith. And, just as you have given Man free choice to love and obey you, think about the use of Free Markets to freely regulate the cost of Technology that prevents or kills what is in Woman’s womb.

Adam continued, It’s better that both Man and Woman have free choice about whether to use and what kind of Technology to use. It’s not good that Woman has whatever served up free on a platter.

Then Adam continued, There are these plastic things Man can use.

CONDOM An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

Condoms prevent disease

They prevent sexually transmitted disease and AIDS. Lord, let the Free Markets decide the cost of contraceptive Technology for both Man and Woman.

And Lord, your son Barack O has already made many, many Rules that take away your people’s freedom to choose.

Oh, Lord God, What is called Obama-Care creates 159 new govt agencies and is indeed a labyrinth designed to control people. See what it looks like:

ObamacareChart Context An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

Obama-Care complexity

Oh, Lord, Barack O passed a Rule called the Individual Mandate that all adults must go to a certain place called an Exchange. And all must register. And all must buy a product just because they are alive.

And if they do not buy this product, called health insurance, they must pay a fine. The fine is fairly small, and many people will choose to pay the fine rather than buy the product. But over time there will be no free markets managing the price of this product.

Your son Barack O seeks to enslave your people. He wants your people dependent upon him for their rights.
LIFEbmp An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

Instead of the rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness coming coming from You, Lord to Man, Woman and Child, Barack O wants all rights to come from him as ruler. And over time your people will become more and more dependent upon Obama and rulers like him.

Lord, what are we to do? Can’t You just unleash Your Justice? and let Justice roll down from the Hills?

And Lord, I thought you rested on the Seventh Day. Are you sure that Rule about free Technology for Woman makes sense?

And God say to Adam: You are an argumentative son! Six days I have labored and I was resting before I called Barack O before me to hear about his new Rule to give Woman free Technology. Had I rested more …

That Barack O Rule is a mistake! I will send a Messenger MESSENGER1 An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

to tell Barack O I do not want him to impose that Rule forcing companies to provide a product for free.

Nothing is free except that which is given freely. Perhaps Hermes, who the Greeks called the god of thieves, can knock some sense into Barack’s hard head!

As for the other Rules Barack O has passed, my people must wisely use the freedoms they have. They can and must petition their government

REDRESS 300x260 An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

petition redress Obama-Care grievances

for redress of grievances. They have many tools to defend their freedoms. Use those tools wisely.

And I will listen to my people, to those who wait on the Lord. I will give them strength.

They who wait on the Lord shall rise up with the wings of eagles and run and not be faint.

Read again from my prophet Isaiah. He promised what I continue to do. [Isaiah 40:31]

And, Man, be careful. Barack O is a willful son who often follows his own path.

Now go, that I may rest for the remainder of the Seventh Day.

And Man did as God bid.

copyright 2012 by Cameron Jackson
An update on the Adam and Eve Story of Creation
DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

sharebookmarx An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

email An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts aol An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts backflip An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts google An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts digg An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts amazon An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts blogmarks An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts facebook An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts gmail An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts read it later An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts blogger An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts reader An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts live An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts yahoo An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts vodpod An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts technorati An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts share save 171 16 An update on the Adam & Eve  Story of Creation: Obama tells God all good things are free including contraceptives for Women, Adam complains  & God acts

Firenze Sage: PETA has gone completely nuts …. [do whales have 'standing' to sue in court?]

Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

orcas in court1 Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]

Can whales sue for their legal rights in our courts? Maybe. The animal rights group PETA filed their official complaint against SeaWorld Inc. on Oct. 6, 2011, for allegedly violating the 13th Amendment rights of killer whales, or orcas.

Monday, a federal judge heard the case. The judge did not dismiss the case — instead, he took it under submission. It is not yet known when he will send PETA his decision.

Though SeaWorld has filed a motion to have case dismissed, the hearing Monday addressed the issue of whether or not the orcas even had standing to be heard.

Still, the fact that the case even made it into a courtroom was a victory for PETA, according to the attorney who represents PETA, Jeff Kerr.

“This is the first time a court has ever considered whether the 13th Amendment applies to the [orcas],” Kerr said outside the courtroom Monday.
_______________

Beware! You could be Simon Legree for bossing your cat around.

For more Firenze Sage, go to: http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/109312

Publisher comment: [For those who wonder, Simon Legree is the slave master in the book, Uncle Tom’s Cabin]

sharebookmarx Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]

email Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]aol Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]backflip Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]google Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]digg Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]amazon Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]blogmarks Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]facebook Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]gmail Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]read it later Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]blogger Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]reader Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]live Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]yahoo Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]vodpod Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]technorati Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]share save 171 16 Firenze Sage:  PETA has gone completely nuts .... [do whales have standing to sue in court?]

Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18-30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democrats

Saturday, January 14th, 2012
CHOICES POLITICSjpg Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democrats

Big choices in ideology & economic plans from Republicans versus one Democratic flavor

So will the 18-30 year olds registered either as independents or as Democrats switch their registration to Republican so they have a voice in the 2012 primaries? Possibly, probably and highly likely.

So, pay attention when your adult children — which happened to me — or their same age friends ask you about Ron Paul and ask who you are supporting in the Republican primary. Clearly from their point of view the Republican primaries are the only game in town. And they are right.

Young people ages 18-30 get real ideological choice if they do switch and register as Republicans.

Look at the lack of choice that the Democrat Party offer young people ages 18-30 in 2012: more Obama, Obama-Care health care costs soar in 2012, higher taxes loom as the deficit has tripled under Obama, the continuation of a sluggish economy, more socialist /progressive/liberal policies that Democrat politicians know better than voters and Obama’s continuing rhetoric that blames the job producers with income over 200,000.

And, wow, wonder of wonders …. the 18 to 30 year old youth are going for ‘old man’ Ron Paul — the most consistently conservative of all the contenders still in the running.

Gov. Perry with his Opps! and could not remember agencies he’d like to axe suggests that fiscal chopping of the federal government may not be his highest priority. Mitt Romney has an economic plan with 58 + things that are tough to remember. Newt Gingrich believes he is the obvious person as he is the best debater and has a decent history balancing budgets. The one woman dropped out. The one Black contender dropped out.

All this said — there are lots of choices and the Republican contenders are definitely defining who they are.

Unlike 2008 there are real choices ideologically and in terms of experience between the various candidates. Thank goodness. One can just hope that the Republican contenders will keep their eye on the ball — what Obama has done wrong and why his policies have failed and what they can offer that has a proven track record. Newt Gingrich balanced the budget for several years in a row. Gov. Perry’s state of Texas has attracted workers and created jobs more than most states. And so on. There’s real choice out there in 2012 offered by the various Republican candidates.

I disagree with the position below that Republicans should target their message to a particular group. In my view, the best that the Republicans can do is to be honest in what their positions are and true to the values that started America.

See below for a different view which I think will always fail because it is inherently manipulative. You decide and comment. written by DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

By MARGARET HOOVER
As the Republican field jockeys for position in the 2012 presidential primaries, it is no surprise to hear the candidates trying to bolster their authority by invoking the name of Ronald Reagan. Yet one critical demographic group will not automatically respond to Reagan’s name: Young voters of the millennial generation, so named because they are the first to come of age in the new millennium.

The oldest members of this generation were just 8 years old when Reagan left office, so Republican candidates can’t assume that invoking his name will win them over. But the eventual Republican nominee should strive to emulate the Gipper by finding a way to connect conservatism to this rising generation of voters.

Reagan brought an entire generation to the Republican Party in 1980, and in 1984 he won the youth vote by 20%. The GOP needs this kind of revolution again if it hopes to recapture the White House and create a sustained majority.

The millennials—born between the beginning of the Reagan era and the end of the Clinton presidency—are the largest age group in America today, numbering approximately 80 million. There are 17 million more millennials than Baby Boomers and 27 million more than Generation Xers (ages 31-45). Millennials voted two-to-one for Barack Obama and also broke hard for John Kerry in 2004—and partisan identification typically solidifies after three presidential election cycles. Thus the next presidential election is critical. Republicans have 16 months to make their case before millennials cast the vote that could make them Democrats or independents for the rest of their lives.

To have any chance at winning young Americans over in 2012, Republicans must understand what makes millennials tick. While it’s risky to generalize about an entire demographic group, here are three important characteristics of the millennial profile:

Millennials have been hit worse by the Great Recession than any other age cohort. Fully 37% of millennials are unemployed or underemployed, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Republican nominee should make the case directly to millennials that President Obama’s policies are perpetuating generational theft, while worsening the chances for job creation.

Enlarge Image

CloseMartin Kozlowski
.Since President Obama took office the deficit has more than tripled and the debt has skyrocketed. Every dollar Mr. Obama has borrowed or spent is a dollar millennials are going to have to pay back in the years ahead, in the form of higher taxes, a more sluggish economy, or both. Republicans can stress that while the Obama presidency has darkened the fiscal future, they have put forward solutions (such as the budget authored by Rep. Paul Ryan) to jump-start the economy and salvage the safety net for millennials.

But when talking about the administration’s failed economic policies, Republicans have to be careful not to try to demonize the president himself: 55% of millennials remain fond of him personally, according to a poll published in March by the Harvard Institute of Politics.

• Millennial politics are pragmatic, not ideological. This demographic group includes a higher number of independents (38%) than any other generation, followed by Democrats (37%) and Republicans (22%), according to Pew Research Center findings published in 2010. The millennials’ overwhelming support for Barack Obama in 2008 was a reflection of Republican brand damage, rather than an endorsement of big-government liberalism. Consider that 40% of millennials call themselves moderate and don’t favor an activist role for government in helping the poor, according to Pew.

Millennials were obviously drawn (as were huge numbers of other voters) to Mr. Obama’s campaign rhetoric that challenged Americans to rise above partisanship and help make government work. But since he took office, his administration has steered a leftward course, and government remains gridlocked. Moreover, the president’s propensity to demagogue the issues in order to outmaneuver his opponents has undermined the credibility of his promise to set childish things aside.

In turn, millennials have shown signs of disappointment: For one thing, fewer of them showed up to vote in 2010 than did in the previous midterm election of 2006.

And while they still like the president personally, his job-approval ratings among millennials have dropped by 18 percentage points since January 2009. He has not delivered on his promise of post-partisan change and has even contributed to the kind of demagoguery that millennials dislike.

Republicans therefore have a golden opportunity to win back millennials by articulating positive and pragmatic solutions to issues that affect them—starting with job creation, spending reform, entitlement reform and education reform.

• Millennials are the most diverse and least traditional generation in America. They are 40% nonwhite, have the highest number of single-parent households, and are the least affiliated with organized religion. They are also the only demographic group of which a majority supports same-sex marriage.

In order to win this generation over, Republicans need to minimize their emphasis on social issues and focus instead on jobs, jobs and jobs. The party should also showcase its significant ethnic and gender diversity in the wake of the 2010 elections, when the GOP put three female governors and two Hispanic governors in office. It also has two Indian-American governors, and it has fielded female and African-American presidential candidates. The Republican Party, in other words, is no longer a party of elderly white men.

With a focus on positive, pragmatic alternatives to the tried-and-failed policies of the Obama administration, Republicans have a chance to win back the youth vote. But the party will have to make a persuasive case that it offers the hope and change millennials have been waiting for.

Ms. Hoover is author of “American Individualism: How a New Generation of Conservatives Can Save the Republican Party,” out this month from Crown.

sharebookmarx Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democrats

email Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsaol Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsbackflip Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsgoogle Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsdigg Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsamazon Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsblogmarks Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsfacebook Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsgmail Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsread it later Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsblogger Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsreader Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratslive Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsyahoo Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsvodpod Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratstechnorati Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democratsshare save 171 16 Aptos Psychologist: huge ideological & economic policy choices for 18 30 yr olds registered as Repubicans in 2012 compared with no choice from Democrats

Aptos psychologist: Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

 

SOCIALISM Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

Will Rep. Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

 

Sam Farr is one of seventy plus socialists elected to the United States Congress.  Below is a letter to Sam from a citizen in his district:

Sam, tear up your socialist card.  Our nation is at a crossroads.  The 2012 elections will be about ideology.   Will American slide further into socialism?     Or will America return to  the conservative values of our Founding Fathers and Mothers?

Socialists  typically  believes that government is the solution, that everything good comes from government and that all belongs to government who  dispenses it wisely. Socialists believe that government creates jobs and wealth.

Conservatives believes in limited government, that federalism rightly limits the powers of each branch of government,  and that under God individuals have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness — with the least interference as possible from government.

Sam,  please support and vote for fiscal responsibility.

Just as families must live within their means, so too  must nations.  Look at Greece.

If a family overspends by $5,000 it cannot start next year’s budget with an increase of 5 K.  The same  goes  for nations.  Therefore Sam ,  please vote to stop all automatic government increases.

All families must live on a budget.  So must America.  Yet months and months go by and the Democrats refuse to make a budget.

Sam, Please  change your ways and support and vote for a balanced budget.

When a family’s income drops their expenses too must drop.  The same for nations.  Growth is flat.  We must cut government spending.   How?

Sam, please support and vote for substantial cuts and no increases in taxes.  How?  Read what Paul Ryan wrote as to how to make substantial fiscal changes.  They make sense.

Why wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in on Obama-Care.  De-fund it now. If the government has the power to require every citizen to purchase  X,  then there is no limit to  what the government can require.  That is precisely the path of socialism  that lies ahead.

So, again  I ask  Sam Farr:  Will you tear up your socialist card?  And, join a tea party or start one?  America is at a crossroads, right?  

 letter  to Sam Farr from  Cameron Jackson, Monterey Bay Forum, POB 1972, Aptos, CA 95001-1972

email address:   DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

sharebookmarx Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

email Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  aol Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  backflip Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  google Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  digg Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  amazon Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  blogmarks Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  facebook Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  gmail Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  read it later Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  blogger Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  reader Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  live Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  yahoo Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  vodpod Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  technorati Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  share save 171 16 Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?

Friday, May 13th, 2011
Empire State Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?

Where best to live & work in America?

What advise might you give to your children as to where to live and work? Think of just six states. Not New York. Young people in New York want to bail due to high costs of living.

Six states — Texas, Tennessee, South Dakota, Nevada, Florida and Wyoming — are both right-to-work states and have no income tax.

Between 2000 and 2008, 4.8 million American moved from forced-union states to right-to-work states. That’s one person moving every minute of every day.

A 2003 Journal of Labor Research article by Robert Reed found that wages rose faster in states that don’t require union membership.

As of today there are 22 right-to-work states and 28 union-shop states. Over the past decade (2000-09) the right-to-work states grew faster in nearly every respect than their union-shop counterparts: 54.6% versus 41% in gross state product, 53.3% versus 40.6% in personal income, 11.9% versus 6.1% in population and 4.1% versus -0.6% in payrolls.

So, tell your children that if they want to keep the money they make and experience more freedom in general — New York, New York is not the place to go. There are a lot of wonderful places in America to work and live. Six states particularly offer the most freedom: states with right-to-work laws and no income tax.

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

sharebookmarx Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?

email Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?aol Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?backflip Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?google Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?digg Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?amazon Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?blogmarks Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?facebook Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?gmail Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?read it later Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?blogger Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?reader Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?live Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?yahoo Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?vodpod Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?technorati Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?share save 171 16 Aptos, CA psychologist: So when your kid wants to move to New York City what advise might you give?

Aptos, CA psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem… and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.

Friday, April 29th, 2011
OBAMA SPENDINGt 300x188 Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.

Obama's massive SPENDING diet IS the problem

“Take away Reagan/Bush tax cuts and we wouldn’t have a spending problem (Santa Cruz Sentinel, Letter to Editor by Sosbee 4-29-2011).

Wrong. Reagan’s tax cuts lead to unprecedented growth in 1982-84 over 7.1% for 4 straight quarters and over 4% growth for another 2 years.

Obama uses massive government spending (Keynesian economic theory) to fix our problems. Results? So far, no fix. And no support for Keynesian theory. Obama’s massive spending diet does not work.

Obama saddles the country with more debt in 2 years than all other Presidents combined. Bush’s $168 BILLION one-time tax rebates in 2008 were followed by Obama’s $814 BILLION spending, cash for clunkers, the $8,000 home buyer tax credit, the Detroit auto bailouts, and BILLIONS for green jobs. Oh, and ObamaCare which takes over 1/6th of the economy.

Dealing with entitlements is the elephant in the room the Democrats refuse to address. Ryan’s GOP budget does talk about the elephant in the room.

So, how best to rein in Medicare? One way not discussed so far: 1) restore the $575 BILLION which Obama cut. 2) Give seniors — those over 65 as well as those now 55 — the choice of “premium care” (individual choice) versus 15 faceless bureaucrats who congress cannot override.

Yes we’ve got serious spending problems to address. We must reduce the deficit as the number one priority. And do it while preserving freedom of choice, encouraging individual responsibility and allowing free markets to work.

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

sharebookmarx Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.

email Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.aol Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.backflip Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.google Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.digg Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.amazon Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.blogmarks Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.facebook Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.gmail Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.read it later Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.blogger Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.reader Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.live Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.yahoo Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.vodpod Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.technorati Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.share save 171 16 Aptos, CA  psychologist: Massive government spending IS the problem... and now is the time for historic choices about freedom, individual responsibility and free markets.

Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Let’s give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views…

Thursday, March 31st, 2011

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Obama lauds “international support” why America must support the “no-war” effort in Libya. Let’s give Obama “internationalism” in spades using Tea Party goals.

Require that Congress tie money for Libya to: 1) Gitmo moves to a Libyan NATO base paid entirely by NATO; 2) de-fund two regulatory agencies, the newly created Consumer Protection agency and the for-ever there EPA.

Place both agencies under the authority of Agency for International Development/ Libya with goals that EPA only clean up Libyan air and water and Consumer Protection only create middle class credit mechanisms for Libya.

It is in our national interest that our democratic, pro-Western European allies get cheap electricity from Libya. And since the costs of Gitmo arise from 9/11 it is well and good that NATO pay for Gitmo. And since many of the terrorists in Gitmo are from the Middle East, it’s cheaper to house them there.

What say you?

sharebookmarx Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...

email Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...aol Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...backflip Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...google Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...digg Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...amazon Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...blogmarks Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...facebook Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...gmail Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...read it later Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...blogger Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...reader Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...live Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...yahoo Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...vodpod Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...technorati Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...share save 171 16 Obama lauds internationalism why Libya. Lets give Obama internationalism according to Tea Party views...

Why I like my Google phone better than Apple’s I-Phone

Sunday, February 20th, 2011

I am a psychologist in California. I want to use the latest tech stuff that connects people world wide. Frankly, I think that Google wins hands down. And will continue to. I cannot imagine an Apple person helping freedom and democracy come to Egypt. I can see why someone connected to Google did assist. All about freedom!

Here’s my reasons why I like my Goggle phone more than I-Phone:

Apple wants people to stay in the Apple world and not stray. Hence Apple applications cannot be used on Google phones. I really like Words with Friends first developed by Apple. It could not be accessed by my Google phone. I just heard that Google now has Words for Friends. Great to hear!

Google gave the world YouTube. And look what that has done for freedom to say what is going on through out the world. Apple has not done anything comparable.

Today someone sent me a terrific YouTube from Mama Hope. A great take off on the CA governor when he was in movies done by a young African boy who wants no pity. He wants a chance. Can you imagine Apple making it possible for simple videos from Africa to be broadcast to the world?

When I buy a Google application it typically costs me 99 cents. And if I don’t like the application I can return it within 24 hours and get my 99 cents back. Apple in comparison charges $5 or so and there is no return policy.

When I read stuff on the Internet using my Google phone it is nicely sized and easy to read. When I use the I-Phone I have to play around with the size of text. For someone who has visual problems –which I do — the Google sizing is much easier to use.

Now I read that Google will take 10% to cover costs compared to the 30% that Apple charges. Do you see a pattern here? I do. Apple wants a monopoly and does all to create and continue a monopoly. Google wants the world to have access to the world’s information. Of course, one might wonder what “information” is and who will be in control.

In the long run it’s best that we have both Apple and Google. Competition, free enterprise …. it works! written by Cameron Jackson drCameronJackson@gmail.com

sharebookmarx Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phone

email Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phoneaol Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonebackflip Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonegoogle Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonedigg Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phoneamazon Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phoneblogmarks Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonefacebook Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonegmail Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phoneread it later Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phoneblogger Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonereader Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonelive Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phoneyahoo Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonevodpod Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phonetechnorati Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phoneshare save 171 16 Why I like my Google phone better than Apples I Phone