Aptos psychologist: Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

 

SOCIALISM Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

Will Rep. Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

 

Sam Farr is one of seventy plus socialists elected to the United States Congress.  Below is a letter to Sam from a citizen in his district:

Sam, tear up your socialist card.  Our nation is at a crossroads.  The 2012 elections will be about ideology.   Will American slide further into socialism?     Or will America return to  the conservative values of our Founding Fathers and Mothers?

Socialists  typically  believes that government is the solution, that everything good comes from government and that all belongs to government who  dispenses it wisely. Socialists believe that government creates jobs and wealth.

Conservatives believes in limited government, that federalism rightly limits the powers of each branch of government,  and that under God individuals have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness — with the least interference as possible from government.

Sam,  please support and vote for fiscal responsibility.

Just as families must live within their means, so too  must nations.  Look at Greece.

If a family overspends by $5,000 it cannot start next year’s budget with an increase of 5 K.  The same  goes  for nations.  Therefore Sam ,  please vote to stop all automatic government increases.

All families must live on a budget.  So must America.  Yet months and months go by and the Democrats refuse to make a budget.

Sam, Please  change your ways and support and vote for a balanced budget.

When a family’s income drops their expenses too must drop.  The same for nations.  Growth is flat.  We must cut government spending.   How?

Sam, please support and vote for substantial cuts and no increases in taxes.  How?  Read what Paul Ryan wrote as to how to make substantial fiscal changes.  They make sense.

Why wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in on Obama-Care.  De-fund it now. If the government has the power to require every citizen to purchase  X,  then there is no limit to  what the government can require.  That is precisely the path of socialism  that lies ahead.

So, again  I ask  Sam Farr:  Will you tear up your socialist card?  And, join a tea party or start one?  America is at a crossroads, right?  

 letter  to Sam Farr from  Cameron Jackson, Monterey Bay Forum, POB 1972, Aptos, CA 95001-1972

email address:   DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

sharebookmarx Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

email Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  aol Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  backflip Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  google Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  digg Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  amazon Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  blogmarks Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  facebook Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  gmail Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  read it later Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  blogger Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  reader Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  live Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  yahoo Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  vodpod Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  technorati Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?  share save 171 16 Aptos psychologist:  Will Sam Farr tear up his socialist card?

What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20-30 years? Why?

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

1143365309 a94f745fe7 7777 What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why?

Roots at Ground Zero outside episcopal church


The Episcopalian Church used to be a welcoming church for persons hurt by their former faith. Scratch beneath the surface of many Episcopalians and you will find that about half are former Catholics. And, there are lot of Protestants from all sorts of fundamental churches who attend episcopal churches. The Episcopalian Church gave fresh air and new Life for hurting souls. That is who inhabited the pews. That was 20 to 30 years ago.

Twenty years ago, in the Episcopalian churches there was not a big focus on belief beyond reciting the Nicene Creed (“I believe in God the Father…) There were lots of liberals and lots of conservatives. And the priests who spoke expressed a variety of viewpoints.

More and more that variety of thinking no longer present. Neither in the pews nor from the pulpit.

Today the Episcopalian church is a welcoming place for liberals with a certain mind cast. Now, scratch an Episcopalian and you find first a liberal. A liberal who believes that same sex marriages are fine and dandy. A liberal who supports the Obama program whole hardly. A liberal who wants to level the playing field. One who wants to make Israel be nice to the Muslim world.

Lately, increasingly, the conservatives have fled the pews. Or been pushed out. Or feel unwelcome. Certainly the conservative views are not respected or given speaking space. What comes out of the typical priest is a palaver of support COPPA (an Alinsky type socialist group), Israel has been a bad boy, Bush had it all wrong and and let’s level the playing field. Oh, and you can work your way to heaven by giving money and time to the causes that this church supports.

Lately, in many Episcopalian and Catholic churches a popular hymn is All Are Welcome! When you look around at the “all” they all seem fairly similar in mind set.

Thus, when I read what the Episcopalian churches are doing at convention — I was not surprised. Disheartened, but not surprised. I wish Convention would address other concerns like the Biblical admonition to take care of the Widow and Orphan in our midst.

Taking care of orphans: Do you know that California law prevents grandparents older than 65 or so from taking care of their orphaned grandchildren? That’s right. If you are over a certain age and even if you were taking care of that child a grandparent is prevented from adopting or serving as a foster parent in California. That is a stupid law.

Why don’t the churches work to change California laws that hurt orphans? That seems like a better local Christian goal –

    take care of the world you immediately inhabit

— than he goals they want us to support, i.e., world wide eradication of poverty and world wide emancipation of women.

In California we put those orphan children in the Foster Care system which does not take care of them very well. And does it very expensively. Why doesn’t the Episcopalian Church focus on Biblical concerns such as the Orphan and the Widow?

I wonder whether the churches have become pawns of socialist organizations such as COPPA? It is hard to find out much about who actually RUNS COPPA.

Anyhow, see the article below about what is going on at the convention for Episcopalian churches
:

The Socialist Workers Party at Prayer By: Mark D. Tooley
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, July 16, 2009

“The 2 million member and fracturing Episcopal Church is currently convened in its governing General Convention in Anaheim, California, and seemingly poised, in between affirmations of same-sex unions and transgenderism, to condemn Israel as the focus of Middle Eastern strife.

“In stereotypes from another era, snooty Episcopalians once practiced anti-Semitism lite, keeping Jews out of their country clubs and not mixing socially. Later, many Episcopalians fought hard to overturn the reality behind those stereotypes. In the 1950′s and 1960′s, Episcopal leaders were in the forefront of defending Israel’s existence. Then in the 1970′s and 1980′s, much of the church endorsed Liberation Theology, which portrays Palestinians as innocent victims and Israel as the Western oppressor. Today, some Episcopal elites seem determined to return to earlier days, when the modern descendants of the ancient Hebrews were regarded with distaste.

There are no resolutions currently before this year’s Episcopal General Convention directly criticizing any government in the world, except two: Israel and the United States.

Resolutions mention human rights abuses in the Philippines and strife in southern Sudan but decline to criticize governments there, though surely Sudan’s Islamist regime, dripping with blood of millions of victims, might merit some disapproval. There is no criticism of any Muslim or communist dictatorship around the world, though Cuba’s Marxist regime is portrayed by one resolution as the victim of U.S. sanctions. In contrast, about a half dozen statements for consideration before the General Convention are aimed at Israel.

Many of these resolutions will not back it out of legislative committee onto the floor of the Episcopal General Convention. But they still reflect a disturbing anti-Israel ethos within much of the denomination.

One resolution disingenuously exploits biblical language to demand that the “Wall around Bethlehem and all other barriers to come down,” referring of course to Israel’s security barrier against Palestinian suicide bombers. “Reach down your divine hand so that the wall shall come down in Bethlehem, the birthplace of your Son, the Prince of Peace; And may the crumbling walls herald the fall of all barriers that divide us,” it intones, while saying nothing about what the security barrier guards against. “Bind us together so that love gives rise to an abundance of tenderness among all people; and may our hearts like Mary’s magnify the Lord, and may your love shower down throughout the world so all divisions are scattered and washed away.” Leaving Israeli defenseless is evidently an example of “tenderness.”

Another equally even-handed resolution urges deploying all the “authority and power” of the Episcopal Church “to end the oppression and the ghetto-ization [of Palestinians by Israel] and to bring the Wall down.” A third resolution demands a Palestinian “sovereign state, independent of the State of Israel, and created from territory in the West Bank and Gaza, with Jerusalem serving as the capitol of both Israel and Palestine, and urges the Administration’s immediate and continuous engagement with representatives of Israel, Palestine, the Arab League and other countries in the region to achieve a comprehensive and enduring peace in the region and in the world.”

Still another resolution, professing to be more equitable, insists that “peace between Israel and Palestine can be achieved only by a division of historic Palestine into two sovereign states,” along the “1949 Armistice line, with mutually agreed border adjustments”; with “unrestricted opening of borders” with Gaza; with a “shared Jerusalem” serving as capital for both Israel and “Palestine”; and denouncing any “force, violence or arbitrary power by Israelis or Palestinians.”

Yet another resolution bemoans the Israeli “blockade” of Gaza, without describing that the barrier responds to Hamas rocket attacks and terrorism against Israeli civilian targets. It cites the anti-Israel Friends of Sabeel group as a resource, demanding that Israel end its “crippling blockade” and “fulfill its obligation as an occupying power under international humanitarian and human rights law to ensure the welfare of the Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip, notably its obligation to ensure the supply of essential necessities such as electrical power and to allow the movement of people and goods.” It also quotes from the Free Gaza Movement in calling Israeli policies a “man-made disaster” that “continues to devastate the people of Gaza; due to Israel’s ongoing hermetic closure of the Gaza Strip over 80% of the population there require food assistance just in order to survive.” Evidently, according to the Episcopalian writers of this resolution, neither Palestinians nor Gaza had any role in this “man-made disaster” in Gaza.

There are no resolutions before the Episcopal General Convention expressing support for Israel or concerns about terrorism or radical Islam. Of course, there is a resolution condemning the U.S. for its policy of “preventive or preemptive strike that is aimed at disrupting a non-imminent, uncertain military threat.” Another resolution confesses that “our nation’s invasion and occupation of Iraq has resulted in individual and global injustices including death and maiming of countless Iraqi innocents, displacement of millions of Iraqi citizens, silent response to atrocities, illegal confinement without representation or formal charges, torture, lack of support and care for military personnel returning home and the opportunity costs of nearly $600 billion spent.” It warns against any continued U.S. military presence in Iraq and implores “our entire nation to seek wisdom from sin committed in Iraq and let that wisdom inform future relationships throughout the world.” Of course, there are no words about Saddam’s genocides, or the murder and mayhem of insurgent groups in Iraq.

One resolution faults the U.S. for not endorsing the “U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” Another blames the U.S. for not banning cluster bombs. Still another condemns the U.S. for its “use of torture and the practice of extraordinary rendition.” No words about torture anywhere else in the world that might distract from portraying Israel and the U.S. as the focus of evil in today’s world. In one bright spot of restraint, the proposed resolution on the Honduras “coup,” thanks to the Bishop of Honduras, is reasonable, warning against OAS sanctions that would punish Honduras in favor of the ousted leftist president.

But that bright spot is rare among otherwise slanted Episcopal proposed resolutions. As my colleague Jeff Walton reported from on site at the Episcopal General Convention, the Episcopal Priest Richard Toll, Chairman of Friends of Sabeel North America, has told supporters that previous Episcopal calls for two-state solutions are now out of date, “when the viability of two states has been destroyed, actively and consciously, by Israeli settlements in the West Bank, settler highways and, in particular, the Wall which divides the land and separates the Palestinian people into five barely contiguous isolated areas.” The Rev. Toll insisted: “The United States needs to face as a nation its complicity and support, financially and emotionally, for this [Israeli] occupation.” Not surprisingly, Toll’s Friends of Sabeel hosted Palestinian Episcopal Priest Naim Ateek of the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center in Jerusalem to the Episcopal General Convention to tout his new book, A Palestinian Christian Cry for Reconciliation. No doubt, many Episcopalians flocked to Ateek’s anti-Israel book rally with eager and itching ears.

A draft of a moderated anti-Israel resolution heading out of committee for the General Convention floor urges “cessation of violence by all Palestinians and Israelis,” “the end of the air, water and land blockade of the Gaza Strip, “the wall in whatever its form around and through Palestinian land to be brought down,” and “an end to the on-going confiscation of Palestinian land, demolition of housing, and the displacement of people,” and a “just resolution for Palestinian refugees,” plus an independent Palestine, with a shared Jerusalem, as part of an “enduring peace.”

But can there be an “enduring peace” without a change of zealous anti-Israel attitudes among Palestinians and Arabs, who still dream of Israel’s ultimate extinction, if not militarily, then demographically? The Episcopalians seem unprepared for that question.

More widely, this year’s Episcopal General Convention, with its obsessive concern about Israel’s sins and various left-wing preoccupations, seems determined to spiral further into schism and futility.
Mark D. Tooley is president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy. Tooley authored the book Taking Back the United Methodist Church.

sharebookmarx What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why?

email What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? aol What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? backflip What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? google What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? digg What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? amazon What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? blogmarks What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? facebook What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? gmail What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? read it later What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? blogger What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? reader What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? live What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? yahoo What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? vodpod What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? technorati What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why? share save 171 16 What has happened in Episcopalian churches over the last 20 30 years? Why?

An Ibo American’s view of Obama’s Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress

Friday, June 26th, 2009

change 300x199 An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress

Hope and Change?

Interesting viewpoint by a first generation African American woman whose cultural roots are Igbo from Nigeria. The following article is from The American Thinker. She comments on President Obama’s post- colonial cultural (socialist/ Marxist) roots. The apple, Obama, did not fall far from the tree, i.e., his father’s values, she says.

My view: Given the 15 + Czars that President Obama has created so far (more coming) to run the government the way Obama wants it run – not what We the People want – Obama’s despotic, undemocratic values are readily apparent. Given that we really have a One Party government – the Democratic Party — currently Obama can push through his despotic appointments – his multitude of Czars. These people, his minions, answer only to Obama. They should answer to Congress and to We the People. Congress holds the power of the purse. But it is a Democratic Party controlled purse.

When will Our Representatives wake up? Well, since Our Representatives are mostly concerned with their own re-election, only when MORE people COMPLAIN vociferously …. then and only then will things change. So even if you live in a overwhelmingly Democratic district – make your voice known regularly.

Rationing of everything by the government is President Obama’s goal. Control of the private sector is President Obama’s goal. Reducing America to a third world power is President Obama’s goal. How? Destroy the power of the private sector. And that is what his policies seek to do.

What has Obama done in 6 months? He took over a couple of car companies. He seeks control of the financial institutions. Bank of America was forced by his administration to take over Merill Lynch. We are trillions of dollars in debt – which will be passed on for generations. Obama seeks Cap and Trade so that private companies have to pay to use energy. That will drive the cost of energy up. Look at Spain with 18 percent unemployment. Spain is the most visible example of a failed “green” economy.

Is this what Americans sought when they embraced HOPE and CHANGE?

Per the Wall Street Journal editorial page today, Obama wants rules so that a 100 year old mother will “learn” from her family and doctor that she should accept pain meds instead of cost ting society for the surgery of a pacemaker. That statement tells it all. This is a real story and the woman now age 105 is has spirit and doing OK with her pacemaker. Let “society”and “government” decide what is best for the elderly according to Obama. Obama waffled and did not answer when asked whether he would seek the best (i.e. most expensive) care for his own family…

President Obama is one cold, arrogant man who dislikes American democratic values. He wants the power to re-make America in his image of how society should run. That’s my view. cameronjacks@gmail.com

contact leikenga@gmail who writes the following article:

“Had Americans been able to stop obsessing over the color of Barack Obama’s skin and instead paid more attention to his cultural identity, maybe he would not be in the White House today. The key to understanding him lies with his identification with his father, and his adoption of a cultural and political mindset rooted in post colonial Africa.


“Like many educated intellectuals in post colonial Africa, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was enraged at the transformation of his native land by its colonial conqueror. But instead of embracing the traditional values of his own tribal cultural past, he embraced an imported Western ideology, Marxism. I call such frustrated and angry modern Africans who embrace various foreign “isms”, instead of looking homeward for repair of societies that are broken, African Colonials. They are Africans who serve foreign ideas.

“The tropes of America’s racial history as a way of understanding all things black are useless in understanding the man who got his dreams from his father, a Kenyan exemplar of the African Colonial.

Before I continue, I need to say this: I am a first generation born West African-American woman whose parents emigrated to the U.S. in the 1970′s from the country now called Nigeria. I travel to Nigeria frequently. I see myself as both a proud American and as a proud Igbo (the tribe that we come from — also sometimes spelled Ibo). Politically, I have always been conservative (though it took this past election for me to commit to this once and for all!); my conservative values come from my Igbo heritage and my place of birth. Of course, none of this qualifies me to say what I am about to — but at the same time it does.

“My friends, despite what CNN and the rest are telling you, Barack Obama is nothing more than an old school African Colonial who is on his way to turning this country into one of the developing nations that you learn about on the National Geographic Channel. Many conservative (East, West, South, North) African-Americans like myself — those of us who know our history — have seen this movie before. Here are two main reasons why many Americans allowed Obama to slip through the cracks despite all of his glaring inconsistencies:

“First, Obama has been living on American soil for most of his adult life. Therefore, he has been able to masquerade as one who understands and believes in American democratic ideals. But he does not. Barack Obama is intrinsically undemocratic and as his presidency plays out, this will become more obvious.

Second, and most importantly, too many Americans know very little about Africa. The one-size-fits-all understanding that many Americans (both black and white) continue to have of Africa might end up bringing dire consequences for this country.

Contrary to the way it continues to be portrayed in mainstream Western culture, Africa is not a continent that can be solely defined by AIDS, ethnic rivalries, poverty and safaris. Africa, like any other continent, has an immense history defined by much diversity and complexity. Africa’s long-standing relationship with Europe speaks especially to some of these complexities — particularly the relationship that has existed between the two continents over the past two centuries. Europe’s complete colonization of Africa during the nineteenth century, also known as the Scramble for Africa, produced many unfortunate consequences, the African colonial being one of them.

The African colonial (AC) is a person who by means of their birth or lineage has a direct connection with Africa. However, unlike Africans like me, their worldviews have been largely shaped not by the indigenous beliefs of a specific African tribe but by the ideals of the European imperialism that overwhelmed and dominated Africa during the colonial period. AC’s have no real regard for their specific African traditions or histories. AC’s use aspects of their African culture as one would use pieces of costume jewelry: things of little or no value that can be thoughtlessly discarded when they become a negative distraction, or used on a whim to decorate oneself in order to seem exotic. (Hint: Obama’s Muslim heritage).

On the other hand, AC’s strive to be the best at the culture that they inherited from Europe. Throughout the West, they are tops in their professions as lawyers, doctors, engineers, Ivy League professors and business moguls; this is all well and good. It’s when they decide to engage us as politicians that things become messy and convoluted.

The African colonial politician (ACP) feigns repulsion towards the hegemonic paradigms of Western civilization. But at the same time, he is completely enamored of the trappings of its aristocracy or elite culture. The ACP blames and caricatures whitey to no end for all that has gone wrong in the world. He convinces the masses that various forms of African socialism are the best way for redressing the problems that European colonialism motivated in Africa. However, as opposed to really being a hard-core African Leftist who actually believes in something, the ACP uses socialist themes as a way to disguise his true ambitions: a complete power grab whereby the “will of the people” becomes completely irrelevant.

Barack Obama is all of the above. The only difference is that he is here playing (colonial) African politics as usual.

In his 1995 memoir, Dreams From My Father — an eloquent piece of political propaganda — Obama styles himself as a misunderstood intellectual who is deeply affected by the sufferings of black people, especially in America and Africa. In the book, Obama clearly sees himself as an African, not as a black American. And to prove this, he goes on a quest to understand his Kenyan roots. He is extremely thoughtful of his deceased father’s legacy; this provides the main clue for understanding Barack Obama.

Barack Obama Sr. was an African colonial to the core; in his case, the apple did not fall far from the tree. All of the telltale signs of Obama’s African colonialist attitudes are on full display in the book — from his feigned antipathy towards Europeans to his view of African tribal associations as distracting elements that get in the way of “progress”. (On p. 308 of Dreams From My Father, Obama says that African tribes should be viewed as an “ancient loyalties”.)

Like imperialists of Old World Europe, the ACP sees their constituents not as free thinking individuals who best know how to go about achieving and creating their own means for success. Instead, the ACP sees his constituents as a flock of ignorant sheep that need to be led — oftentimes to their own slaughter.

Like the European imperialist who spawned him, the ACP is a destroyer of all forms of democracy.

Here are a few examples of what the British did in order to create (in 1914) what is now called Nigeria and what Obama is doing to you:

Convince the people that “clinging” to any aspect of their cultural (tribal) identity or history is bad and regresses the process of “unity”. British Imperialists deeply feared people who were loyal to anything other than the state. “Tribalism” made the imperialists have to work harder to get people to just fall in line. Imperialists pitted tribes against each other in order to create chaos that they then blamed on ethnic rivalry. Today many “educated” Nigerians, having believed that their traditions were irrelevant, remain completely ignorant of their ancestry and the history of their own tribes.
Confiscate the wealth and resources of the area that you govern by any means necessary in order to redistribute wealth. The British used this tactic to present themselves as empathetic and benevolent leaders who wanted everyone to have a “fair shake”. Imperialists are not interested in equality for all. They are interested in controlling all.
Convince the masses that your upper-crust university education naturally puts you on an intellectual plane from which to understand everything even when you understand nothing. Imperialists were able to convince the people that their elite university educations allowed them to understand what Africa needed. Many of today’s Nigerians-having followed that lead-hold all sorts of degrees and certificates-but what good are they if you can’t find a job?

“Lie to the people and tell them that progress is being made even though things are clearly becoming worse. One thing that the British forgot to mention to their Nigerian constituents was that one day, the resources that were being used to engineer “progress” (which the British had confiscated from the Africans to begin with!) would eventually run out. After WWII, Western Europe could no longer afford to hold on to their African colonies. So all of the counterfeit countries that the Europeans created were then left high-and-dry to fend for themselves. This was the main reason behind the African independence movements of the1950 and 60′s. What will a post-Obama America look like?

Use every available media outlet to perpetuate the belief that you and your followers are the enlightened ones-and that those who refuse to support you are just barbaric, uncivilized, ignorant curmudgeons. This speaks for itself.

“America, don’t be fooled. The Igbos were once made up of a confederacy of clans that ascribed to various forms of democratic government. They took their eyes off the ball and before they knew it, the British were upon them. Also, understand this: the African colonial who is given too much political power can only become one thing: a despot.
L.E. Ikenga can be reached at leikenga@gmail.com.

For more go to: American Thinker

sharebookmarx An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress

email An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  aol An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  backflip An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  google An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  digg An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  amazon An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  blogmarks An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  facebook An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  gmail An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  read it later An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  blogger An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  reader An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  live An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  yahoo An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  vodpod An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  technorati An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress  share save 171 16 An Ibo Americans view of Obamas Marxist & Socialist roots in dreams of his father..www.freedomOk.net/wordpress