The 2010 U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts…

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

JIM DEMINT TEA PARTY large300 The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...

response to Jim DeMint's WSJ article

I work in California as a licensed psychologist with children who have disabilities. Some of the children and youth I assess should never have been diagnosed as disabled. There is an entitlement mentality such that some families want a diagnosis because of the benefits that will come with the diagnosis.

Let’s hope that newly elected Tea Party representatives to Congress address how to rein in the cost of entitlement programs. One way to start could be to take a close look at the social security disability entitlements that children receive.

An appropriate way to limit entitlements is to limit the time that children with disabilities receive disability money. Many children with disabilities make amazing growth. For example, some children diagnosed with Autistic Disorder at age three will lose many of the characteristic symptoms within 3-4 years. On the other end, too many young 18 year olds who score low on IQ tests as they leave high school get diagnosed as mentally retarded and moved on to social security for life.

For children and youth age 3 – 25, a limit of 3 years on disability is probably the best way to go. Children should be eligible for a maximum of 3 years and review required to extend eligibility. The federal government could require schools to send for review all 3 year IEP psycho-educational evaluations.

As children shed their difficulties based on successful school interventions they should also shed their federal government disability entitlement.

Have the review done by an independent source, i.e., private licensed psychologists in the same geographical area where the child resides. For older youth who score low on IQ tests the federal government via private psychologists in the locale should examine the applicants. Does the young 18 year old fit in fairly well to their culture and what is expected of them? What kinds of hopes does the young person have and how can that young person become employable?

Below is an article by Jim DeMint from the Wall Street Journal 11-3-2010 addressed to the persons newly elected to Congress and the Senate.

In 2010, America elected an overwhelming number of Republican and Tea Party movement persons. In 2010 America rejected ObamaCare, the stimulus bills, the huge deficit, massive tax increases and …. President Obama’s teleprompter! Bowing to various heads of states and apologizing for America did not sit well here at home.

America wants the economy to improve, more limited government, less intrusion by government, growth of the private sector, a balanced budget, jobs that stay here and … to continue to believe that America is exceptional. It appears that many Americans reject President Obama’s domestic and foreign policies.

How can the newly elected representatives stay true to why they were elected? Jim DeMint has some excellent thoughts. The above is written by Cameron Jackson DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

November 3, 2010

By JIM DEMINT

Congratulations to all the tea party-backed candidates who overcame a determined, partisan opposition to win their elections. The next campaign begins today. Because you must now overcome determined party insiders if this nation is going to be spared from fiscal disaster.

“Many of the people who will be welcoming the new class of Senate conservatives to Washington never wanted you here in the first place. The establishment is much more likely to try to buy off your votes than to buy into your limited-government philosophy. Consider what former GOP senator-turned-lobbyist Trent Lott told the Washington Post earlier this year: “As soon as they get here, we need to co-opt them.”

“Don’t let them. Co-option is coercion. Washington operates on a favor-based economy and for every earmark, committee assignment or fancy title that’s given, payback is expected in return. The chits come due when the roll call votes begin. This is how big-spending bills that everyone always decries in public always manage to pass with just enough votes.

But someone can’t be bribed if they aren’t for sale. Here is some humble advice on how to recognize and refuse such offers.

First, don’t request earmarks. If you do, you’ll vote for legislation based on what’s in it for your state, not what’s best for the country. You will lose the ability to criticize wasteful spending. And, if you dare to oppose other pork-barrel projects, the earmarkers will retaliate against you.

‘In 2005, Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) offered a measure to kill funding for the infamous “Bridge to Nowhere.” Before the vote, Sen. Patty Murray (D., Wash.), an appropriator, issued a warning on the Senate floor.

“If we start cutting funding for individual projects, your project may be next,” she said. “When Members come down to the floor to vote on this amendment, they need to know if they support stripping out this project, Senator Bond [a Republican appropriator] and I are likely to be taking a long, serious look at their projects to determine whether they should be preserved during our upcoming conference negotiations.”

The threat worked. Hardly anyone wanted to risk losing earmarks. The Senate voted 82-15 to protect funding for the Bridge to Nowhere.

Second, hire conservative staff. The old saying “personnel is policy” is true. You don’t need Beltway strategists and consultants running your office. Find people who share your values and believe in advancing the same policy reforms. Staff who are driven by conservative instincts can protect you from unwanted, outside influences when the pressure is on.

Third, beware of committees. Committee assignments can be used as bait to make senators compromise on other matters. Rookie senators are often told they must be a member of a particular committee to advance a certain piece of legislation. This may be true in the House, but a senator can legislate on any matter from the Senate floor.

Fourth, don’t seek titles. The word “Senator” before your name carries plenty of clout. All senators have the power to object to bad legislation, speak on the floor and offer amendments, regardless of how they are ranked in party hierarchy.
Election Night at Opinion Journal

Lastly, don’t let your re-election become more important than your job. You’ve campaigned long and hard for the opportunity to go to Washington and restore freedom in America. People will try to convince you to moderate conservative positions and break campaign promises, all in the name of winning the next race. Resist the temptation to do so. There are worse things than losing an election-like breaking your word to voters.

At your swearing-in ceremony, you will, as all senators do, take an oath to “support and defend the Constitution.” Most will fail to keep their oath. Doing these five things will help you maintain a focus on national priorities and be one who does.

>Congress will never fix entitlements

, simplify the tax code or balance the budget as long as members are more concerned with their own narrow, parochial interests. Time spent securing earmarks and serving personal ambitions is time that should be spent working on big-picture reforms.

When you are in Washington, remember what the voters back home want-less government and more freedom. Millions of people are out of work, the government is going bankrupt and the country is trillions in debt. Americans have watched in disgust as billions of their tax dollars have been wasted on failed jobs plans, bailouts and takeovers. It’s up to us to stop the spending spree and make sure we have a government that benefits America instead of being a burden to it.

Tea party Republicans were elected to go to Washington and save the country-not be co-opted by the club. So put on your boxing gloves. The fight begins today.

Mr. DeMint is a Republican senator from South Carolina.

sharebookmarx The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...

email The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...aol The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...backflip The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...google The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...digg The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...amazon The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...blogmarks The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...facebook The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...gmail The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...read it later The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...blogger The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...reader The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...live The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...yahoo The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...vodpod The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...technorati The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...share save 171 16 The 2010  U.S. Congress should look at how to appropriately cut entitlement programs including SSI Disability for children and youth. Some thoughts...

Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces? Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and here’s why …

Friday, October 29th, 2010

Did you listen to KSCO and the candidates for Congress last Sat. 10-12? Lots of people called in with good questions.

Opposed to Democrat incumbent Sam Farr are a number of candidates including Republican Jeff Taylor.

Jeff Taylor1 133x300 Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...

Jeff Taylor, Republican opposes Sam Farr for U.S. Congress

My question did not get asked.

My question for Sam Farr: The membership roster of the American Socialist Party shows you, Sam Farr, as a member.

If that is true, >why are you a socialist? If that is not true, what have you done to remove your name?

The gist of what I did hear on KSCO: Sam Farr spoke proudly of ObamaCare. Sam Farr lauded his accomplishments to provide government programs to help people.

I wonder whether Sam Farr makes much attempt to listen to his constituents. I don’t think so. For example, Sam Farr said that — in the last 17 years he has been in office representing Santa Cruz and Monterey — he had never heard a Kay Zwerling editorial.

ksco zwerling Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...

Kay Zwerling's conservative editorials not heard by Sam Farr


Therefore, I don’t think Sam Farr listens to KSCO — one of the few independent radio stations in northern California.

So what did the other candidates say? The other four candidates sounded more similar than different. All four strongly oppose out of control spending. All four discussed ways how to grow the private sector and create private sector jobs.

The one woman, Mary Larkin, says on her website: “… the current administration seems to have our economy on the fast-track towards destruction and none of us can sit idly by any longer.”

As a conservative independent. I am at odds with all of Sam Farr’s comments per the KSCO discussion. And I liked largely everything that the other four candidates said. So how to choose?

Think of the decision how to vote akin to choosing an ice cream. For me, Sam Farr is akin to licorice which I cannot stand. I could never eat a licorice ice cream cone.

On the other hand, I like strawberry, chocolate, vanilla and mint. Those voices — a Libertarian, a Green Party a Republican and a write-in — all sound good. I liked what I heard from all of them.

How to choose? Like the two basics — Vanilla and Chocolate — the United States has a two party system.

Though I certainly liked what I heard write-in Ron Kabat say on KSCO, I wish as a Tea Party movement supporter he could support Republican Party candidate Jeff Taylor.

What Ron Kabat says on his website:
“My PROPOSAL –> Members of Congress should voluntarily accept a 15% wage cut until our national deficit begins to decrease for three years AND our national unemployment rate falls to 6%….”

I tried to contact Ron Kabat on his web site but there is no contact form, no email address and and no way to leave a message. That sends a message I dislike — it is hard to connect to someone who wants to represent us.

The votes for Kabat, the Libertarian and the Green Party are great as a Custer’s Last Stand but not likely to remove Sam Farr from office.

Let’s hope we get real change: Repeal ObamaCare. Repeal all the bail outs. Cut the deficit. Grow the private sector. Cut taxes. Promote small business. Cut bureaucracy and red tape.

To remove Sam Farr from office, a Democrat and member of the American Socialist Party, - can third party candidates and Tea Party movement supporters agree on what they have in common? Can they support one candidate who can defeat the Democrat “achievements” of the last two years?

What do you say? How best to vote out a Democratic incumbent who has been in office the last 17 years? Let’s get all the third party and Tea Party candidates to join in support of one candidate: Jeff Taylor.

So how is the write-in in Alaska doing? Sarah Palin calls it Operation Chaos.

KFQD 750 AM radio host Dan Fagan is calling the plan an act of “civil disobedience” to protest what he views is an illegal effort by the state to aid Murkowski’s write-in campaign. Fagan supports Republican nominee Joe Miller, a tea party candidate who beat Murkowski in a primary upset earlier this year.

A website devoted to promoting Sarah Palin, another Miller backer, dubs the effort Operation Alaska Chaos.

The state Republican and Democratic parties went to court to stop the state from providing voters at polling stations with a list of write-in candidates’ names. The parties and other voting-rights advocates argue that the list provides Murkowski with an unfair advantage and violates state law.

That case remains active in the Alaska court system, with the state Supreme Court scheduled to hear oral arguments on Friday.

But Fagan isn’t waiting for a last-minute decision. The host hopes that his effort will diminish any advantage Murkowski could receive via the state-sanctioned write-in list, by crowding the list with 100 or so names of new write-in candidates who filed before Thursday’s deadline.

(Photo of Murkowski: AP/Chris Miller)

..

sharebookmarx Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...

email Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...aol Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...backflip Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...google Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...digg Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...amazon Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...blogmarks Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...facebook Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...gmail Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...read it later Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...blogger Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...reader Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...live Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...yahoo Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...vodpod Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...technorati Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...share save 171 16 Time for all candidates who oppose Democrat incombant Sam Farr, ObamaCare and out of control spending to join forces?  Support Republican Candidate Jeff Taylor? Yes and heres why ...

Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obama’s goal to fundamentally change America?

Saturday, October 16th, 2010

Cameron Jackson DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Remember the State of the Union message?  President Obama used the ocassion to publicly rebulk the Supreme Court as they sat there with no way to respond back.   The President criticised the Court for  their recent decison that corporatons have First Amendment free speech rights.

The following article about the Tea Party movement is from the Wall Street Journal. (more…)

sharebookmarx Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?

email Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?aol Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?backflip Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?google Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?digg Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?amazon Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?blogmarks Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?facebook Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?gmail Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?read it later Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?blogger Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?reader Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?live Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?yahoo Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?vodpod Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?technorati Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?share save 171 16 Aptos, CA Psychologist. The Tea Party movement is a response to President Obamas goal to fundamentally change America?