Aptos psychologist: Students suffer when foreign math teachers speak poor English

Why don’t public schools require that math teachers from abroad demonstrate proficiency in speaking English? Schools should not hire foreigh teachers who cannot clearly communicate in English. It is hard enough to learn advanced math and science skills. Adding the burdern of listening to a teacher who cannot speak clear English can be overwhelming.

As a result, students suffer in multiple ways: They don’t learn the advanced math skills. Their self esteem suffers. They drop out of other math and science classes they might have pursued.

I overhead this at lunch yesterday. Hearing this, I turned and said that this happens in college as well as in high school.
I overheard a woman say:

“My daughter, a Junior at Mission High, is getting a A in Advanced Physics and an F in Intermediate Algebra. Because of the F, she cannot participate for the next grading perion on the softball team. There is no way she can raise the F to a decent grade. She cannot understand her math teacher. Her math teacher’s English is so poor that we got a tutor for her. She can learn the math from the tutor and get an A in Advanced Physics. But she cannot understand what her Algebra teacher says…. The school requires that she continue in the Math class …. We have enrolled her at Cabrillo College for the summer to learn the Algebra …

The young woman obviously is bright and capable of learning. To get an A in Advanced Physics she has to know the math. By having a tutor she has picked up the necessary math skills. But to be required to sit in a class she is failing because the teacher cannot communicate — the public school system is failing this young person. He self esteem may suffer. Her abilities to do sports will suffer.

All teachers in California — including substitutes — must pass a basic proficiency test in Math and English. It is a written test. Obviously, there should also be a test in speaking understandable English. Let the public speak up!

Share

Aptos attorney: Make the Public Meeting Public!

Require that the rulers/ respresentaitive disclose their views ahead of public meetings.

Share

James Jackson, Esq.
James Jackson, Esq.
The current public meeting scenario goes something like this: The governing body, hereinafter rulers, assembles ensconced in their segregated area surrounded by staff. The public fidgets in their assigned area while first staff and then legal staff imparts data. Finally the public statements, limited in time, commence. Then the rulers deliver their ukase.

This is no better than an American version of Hyde Park Corner. Words delivered to the wind.

I propose that from now on all rulers must, 3 days before a hearing of public interest, post their tentative view of the issue along with their reasons for holding the view. Ideally they would also be required to post the contrary view and reasons. But that can wait another time.

Should a ruler not post her view, she is disqualified from voting on the issue. Should she miss 3 postings, she is recalled.

Now we can have a meeting where the public knows who stand where. Now the public can address pertinent issues rather than just orating with the hope that something will apply to some ruler’s hidden view. And this process will tell us something of the thought process,if any,of the particular ruler.

It is much more difficult to be a secret toady of a special interest if she must reason publicly.If she displays her opinion with reasons, it may be that she is just factually incorrect and this can be remedied. And argument, which just might be persuasive, can be brought to bear on a particular reason. But only if one knows the reason.

So let us have a much more involved public. Lets have a more open set of rulers.

James Jackson, Esq. jaj48@aol.com

Share

Aptos psychologist: I will vote NO on all 5 CA tax measures because taking money dedicated to health & children services likely to cause considerable harm. See arguments below for and against.

Vote YES on IA if you want 2 EXTRA years of actual income, sales and vehicle tax increases. Vote NO on IA if you believe the legislative analyst – who says the measure is incomprehensible.

Vote YES on IB if you want a multi-billion increase in education spending. Vote NO on IB if you dislike the grip of unions on government. In California, 57 percent of government workers are unionized compared to 37 percent nationally. CA teachers make 25 % more than elsewhere and are highest paid in nation.

Vote YES on IC
if you want more people buying CA lottery tickets. Vote NO in IC if concerned about the poor – who overwhelmingly buy the bulk of all lottery tickets. Vote NO if gambling money away is particularly bad during these economic times.

Vote YES on ID which grabs the tobacco money. Vote NO on ID because that tobacco money currently is dedicated to children’s services which you do not want cut.

Vote YES on IE which takes the so-called millionaire tax money. Vote NO on IE because that money is currently dedicated to health services. Vote NO because The biggest cut in Santa Cruz County will be the health services. Vote NO because swine flu, T.B and other infectious diseases must be kept in check.

Share

Aptos: Best restaurant! Cafe Rio on the Beach offers good food at great prices.

How about an excellent appetizer and 2 glasses of house wine for $10? Go to Cafe Rio – in my opinion the best overall restaurant in Aptos. I was there tonight and had their mussels. Could not have been better. Then take a walk on the beach right in front. Beautiful evening.

Share

Gilroy lays off a sixth of its work force including 6 police & fire positions

As property values plummet across California, Santa Clara County is expecting an almost-unheard-of drop in its property tax rolls — about 2 percent.

Gilroy should be so lucky. The Garlic Capital of the World is facing a plunge of 11 percent — which represents a cut of about $1 million in tax revenue.

While many other cities in the county are now only beginning to panic about the sudden drop in revenue, the South County city has been struggling to keep from drowning for a year now.

As sales tax revenue plunged and building fees dried up last fall, the city council voted to lay off a sixth of its workforce — the equivalent of 48 full-time employees, including six full-time positions in both the police and fire departments.

Residents are being told to report many crimes online instead of in person or on the phone. The fire department went from three engine companies to two.

“It’s a bloodbath down there,” said county Assessor Larry Stone.

The pain has filtered down to Monterey Street, the downtown’s main drag in this city of 52,000.

At Sue’s Coffee Roasting Company, owner Sue Shalit has noticed a smaller morning crowd, in part because there are fewer city employees grabbing a morning Joe.

“Some people just don’t come that early any more. Now, unfortunately, they’re getting to sleep in,” said Shalit, who misses not only their business but the people themselves.

One of the toughest cuts for the police department was losing its community services officer who specialized in fighting graffiti. She not only photographed the tags so investigators could identify the vandals, she also cleaned up the graffiti herself.

“Now we’re seeing more graffiti,” said Sgt. Jim Gillio, “and it’s staying up longer.”

The economy took a nasty turn just when downtown Gilroy was making a comeback. The city had just spent millions on new sidewalks and street trees. Dozens of condos were being built on Monterey Street.

Now, many buildings sit empty, in part because laws require vacant properties with unreinforced masonry to be retrofitted before new tenants can move in. Plans were afoot to fix the buildings, but now owners can’t get loans or are reluctant to spend money until the economy picks up.

“It’s been a mess, even before we learned about the million dollar loss in property tax,” Gilroy Mayor Al Pinheiro said.

When Gilroy officials were initially preparing their current budget, they calculated the city would end the fiscal year with a $10 million deficit — representing about 20 percent of the budget. The city immediately froze 23 positions; eliminated all non-mandatory training and travel; and delayed projects such as remodeling city hall.

Over the next several months, however, the city continued to bleed red ink as the economy tanked, prompting the layoffs.

Like Morgan Hill and parts of San Jose, Gilroy has a lot of newer homes. Those were generally the first to drop in value as builders slashed prices. As mortgage values began to exceed home values, foreclosure rates skyrocketed.

“We have homes worth half as much as a couple of years ago,” said Gilroy City Administrator Tom Haglund.

The poster children for this frightening trend were fast-growing Central Valley cities such as Manteca and Tracy. But in many ways, Haglund said, “we’re the Central Valley of Santa Clara County.”

Indeed, in “feel” and in politics, the majority-Latino, relatively conservative city is more closely aligned with the agricultural towns to the south and east than with Silicon Valley.

“Gilroy is the only city in Santa Clara County that doesn’t touch another city,” said developer Gary Walton, a Gilroy resident who has an office downtown.

The isolation may make the place distinctive and quaint. But it also presents problems.

“I do worry about Gilroy, because we’re kind of an island,” Fire Chief Dale Foster said.

With a smaller fire department, he said, Gilroy will sometimes have to depend on far-flung departments for help.

“Luckily, we haven’t had that many big fires,” Foster said. “But the potential is also there for a train wreck or a big traffic accident on 101.”

To ease its pain, the city has been dipping into reserves — $4.7 million alone in the last fiscal year. But the city council decided it can no longer drain the rainy-day fund. In the next few weeks, it “will put together a truly balanced budget for the next fiscal year,” which will mean even deeper cuts, Mayor Pinheiro said.

That likely means a lot fewer employees, or a lot of employees making less. The city has asked its unions to reduce wages and benefits to save jobs.

Amid the gloom, there are signs Gilroy voters are willing to share the pain.

Despite the city’s reputation for turning down tax measures, voters in November passed a $37 million bond measure to build a new library. “Nobody could believe it,” said Lani Yoshimura, the longtime community librarian. The same day, voters in the Gilroy Unified School District passed a $150 million bond measure for school improvements.

The city recently got great ratings for the new library bonds, largely because the bond-rating agencies thought city officials had done a good job wielding the budgetary ax before things got worse.

City officials also say they’ve seen a spike in volunteerism. Residents have volunteered to help police patrol the streets and staff the Gilroy Museum, which lost all its paid employees to budget cuts.

Mayor Pinheiro said he was amazed when he tried to find residents willing to organize the town’s Memorial Day parade. He sent out a mass e-mail and quickly came up with a committee of nine to make sure the town didn’t cancel its popular parade.

Perhaps, developer Walton said, the do-it-yourself spirit can catch on downtown. “Maybe,” he said, “it’s time for us to start cleaning our own sidewalks.”

Share

Aptos & there abouts: Find a psychologist through the Monterey Bay Psych Assoc. www.mbpsych.org

There is a Find A Therapist directory to assist. When I searched for “autism” only one name appeared. I would think that more than one psychologist does diagnosis and treatment of autism. Autism is a disorder that can be screened for accurately by 18 months. Probably “developmental disorders” will give you more choices of clinical psychologists who can assist you.

For more info go to: Monterey Bay Psychological Association

Share

Join A-Autism Net for Testing on Monterey Bay Forum

Do you work with children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders? Parent of a child? Join A-Autism Net for Testing at www.freedomOK.net/wordpress Tell your stories. Get support. For northern CA parents and professionals. Dr. Jackson is a member of the Asperber’s Ring which is a group of blogs that focus on Asperger’s Disorders and similiar issues.

Dr. Cameron Jackson wants to collaborate with other professionals who screen and treat children with autistic spectrum disorders. One other psychologist is listed in the Monterey Psychological Association as working with autistic children. Contact Dr. Jackson at: cameronjacks@gmail.com

For other resources go to: Web Ring

Share

Aptos psychologist: Dumb decision? Hardest hit will be the Public Health agency. 212 jobs may be cut in proposed Santa Cruz County budget

The County Administrative Office on Friday released a budget proposal for next fiscal year, beginning in July, that calls for up to 140 job cuts, an average of 20 percent less funding for county departments like public works and probation and a 20 percent cut to nonprofits providing “safety-net” services for the elderly and poor.The proposed budget includes no new funding for infrastructure, like road construction or technology improvements. The budget entails major cuts at Juvenile Hall, including elimination of a once promising alternatives-to-incarceration program. And, the budget barely toes the line when it comes to sheriff patrols.

Hit hardest is public health,
whose programs not only benefit those with limited access to health care but ripple across the entire region, say health officials.

“Swine flu does not pay attention to how much income you make or your legal status, and this is true of all infectious diseases. You want a community whose health is good and has access to medical care,” said Rama Khalsa, director of the county Health Services Agency.

The 530-person health agency will lose about 60 positions under the budget proposal, which translates into reductions in mental health services, substance abuse assistance and clinical care.

The cuts proposed this week by county administrators attempt to close a $25 million gap between the county’s projected revenues and spending. The estimated $367 million general fund budget for next year reflects a roughly 6 percent decrease over this year’s budget.

The county, like a city government, is responsible for basic municipal services in the unincorporated areas, like road maintenance and planning, with the additional responsibility of providing state-mandated regional programs like the courts and health and human services.

Although no part of the roughly 2,400-person organization is immune to cuts, county administrators say they’ve made some funding priorities in the proposed budget, like public safety.

The Sheriff’s Office will lose positions, but most will be in support areas and perhaps investigations but not front-line police work.

“This will mean that some cases will take a lot longer to be handled,” said incoming Sheriff-Coroner Phil Wowak. “But patrols services and emergency services would be the last thing we would cut.”

The proposed budget calls for an 8.6 percent reduction of the county’s total work force, meaning 212 positions, though county administrators say only about two-thirds of those are currently filled.

Last month, the personnel department directed 156-hour furloughs for upper- and middle-management, as part of the ongoing cost-saving effort, presenting another significant cost savings in the proposed budget.

County administrators are currently in talks with representatives from the county’s largest labor union, Service Employees International Union, and say they hope a similar furlough arrangement can be set up. Such a concession, they say, would stave off many of the proposed layoffs.

An SEIU representative on Friday had no comment on whether they would agree to take time off.

The county’s proposed budget will be the subject of hearings in coming weeks and is expected to be finalized in June.

Share

Aptos psychologist: Why does Utah have highest rate of Autistic Spectrum Disorder?

Currently, 1 in 150 children in the U.S. are diagnosed with an autistic spectrum disorder (autism, pervasive developmental disorder, asperger’s disorder). Uhah’s rate is 1 in 133 children. Why so much higher? Beats me. The quality of life lead by adults with ASD is higher in Utah. Why? I suspect that family connections and social connections are tighter in Utah compared to a state such as California.

Share

Aptos psychologist: First born, breach and mother over 35 are risk factors for Autistic Spectrum Disorder children

“Children who are firstborn or breech or whose mothers are 35 or older when giving birth are at significantly greater risk for developing an autism spectrum disorder, University of Utah School of Medicine researchers have reported in a new study with Utah children.

In the April 27, 2009, online issue of the journal Pediatrics, the researchers showed that women who give birth at 35 or older are 1.7 times more likely to have a child with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), compared with women between the ages of 20-34. Children diagnosed with ASD also were nearly 1.8 times more likely to be the firstborn child, the researchers found.

Although they didn’t identify a causal relationship between breech births and autism, children diagnosed with the disorder were more than twice as likely to have been a breech presentation, meaning they were not born head first.

“The results of this study give us an opportunity to look more closely at these risk factors for children across the autism spectrum, and not only those diagnosed with autism,” said first author Deborah A. Bilder, M.D., assistant professor of psychiatry. “This shows that further investigation of the influence of prenatal factors is warranted.”

Autism is a complex brain disorder that impairs social, communicative, and behavioral development and often is characterized by extreme behavior.

Bilder and her colleagues in the U medical school’s department of psychiatry and the Utah Department of Health examined the birth records of Utah children who had been identified as having an autism spectrum disorder in a 2002 epidemiological study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). That study looked at 8-year-old children in Utah’s three most populous counties-Salt Lake, Davis, and Utah-and used nationally accepted criteria for an ASD classification. The researchers compared birth records for children identified with an ASD with unaffected children born in those three counties in 1994. Of that group, 196 were identified with an ASD. Birth certificates were available for 132 of those children, and the researchers examined those records for possible prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal risk factors related to ASD.

Their investigation showed that the mother’s age when giving birth (older than 34), breech presentation, and being firstborn were significant risk factors for the development of an ASD. The researchers also identified a small but significant relationship between the increased duration of education among mothers of those children.

Further investigation would be needed to understand how these three risk factors may relate to ASD. But a possible explanation for the correlation of firstborn children might be that parents are reluctant to have a second child if the first is diagnosed with ASD. A possible interpretation of increased risk associated with advanced maternal age is that changes in genes occurring over time may contribute to autism spectrum disorders. The association found between breech presentation and ASD most likely indicates a shared cause, such as neuromuscular dysfunction. The vast majority of children born breech, however, are healthy.

This study follows several from the University in recent years, which found that Utah has one of the highest autism spectrum disorder rates in the country (one in 133 Utah children has the disorder), helped indentify a gene that may predispose people to autism, and showed that Utah adults with autism have a better quality of life than those in other studies.

For the next step in their research, Bilder and her colleagues want to repeat this study, using a larger population of Utah 8-year-olds from subsequent birth years, to see if it replicates the results of the current study. They also may study the subset of children with breech presentation to determine whether they haven a genetic vulnerability that put them at increased risk for developing an autism spectrum disorder.

The study’s other authors are Judith P. Zimmerman, Ph.D., research assistant professor of psychiatry; Judith Miller, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry; and William M. McMahon, M.D., chairman of the Department of Psychiatry.

Share