Better to borrow electronic books from public libraries than buy them

Kindle owners can borrow from public libraries via Amazon connecting with OverDrive Inc coming soon. Can Kindle owners already borrow from their local library?

Share

Borrow E-books on Kindle

Think about the revolution in communication that the cell phone has created world wide.

Just as revolutionary, E-Books can likewise put books in the hands of children and adults in Africa, India and world-wide.

And now, increasingly people can borrow electronic books from public libraries rather than buy them. What a boon for education. Sometime later this year owners of a Kindle can borrow digital books from public libraries. Amazon is working with Overdrive Inc which has access to 300,00 books.

Many major public libraries including New York, Chicato and San Francisco offer free digital-book lending. Library card holders can download books from library websites. Each has its own policy with typical lending policies 14-21 days.

Free Kindle books are some of the hottest items on the Internet these days. One of the best things about the Kindle is that it comes with a built-in wireless system so you can access the Internet and download books for your Kindle right on the device.

Despite Amazon’s efforts to offer over 350,000 ebooks on Amazon’s Kindle Store, a lot of people still opt to search for free sources of ebooks rather than pay for their Kindle books.

Thus, a lot of websites came to the rescue. A lot of websites these days offer free ebooks. Several others offer free ebooks in general. These websites offering free ebooks can really make your Kindle library grow and at the same time help you save a lot.

Sources for free Kindle books.

Freekindlebooks.org – Freekindlebooks.org offers more than a thousand titles for your Amazon Kindle. The website, however, focuses only on classic titles, so you won’t find the newest best sellers there. For classic lovers, the site is a great source for free Kindle books. Ebooks are already supported in MOBI or PRC formats, which are supported by both Kindle 2 and Kindle DX.

Munsey’s – Munsey’s may not offer the Internet’s largest free Kindle books database, but it offers some really good titles in Kindle-ready formats.

Fictionwise – Fictionwise also offers more than 15,000 free ebooks, all of which are already in Kindle formats. Its collection is also continuously growing.

Manybooks.net – Manybooks.net is a popular resource for free ebooks provided in several formats, including Kindle formats. The books are mostly classics and general fiction titles. The newer titles, however, are not usually found on the site.

Baen.com – Baen.com also offers Kindle books for download. Some are for sale, while some are also offered for free.

Authors give Away Freebies

The top 25 authors and the top 10 publishers on Amazon also sometimes give away free Kindle books to Kindle users. Keep an eye open for such promotions on Amazon’s Kindle Store.

Need More Free Ebooks?

Project Gutenberg – Project Gutenberg is created by Michael Hart, who started his collection in 1971. The website offers more than 20,000 books. Project Gutenberg also releases lists such as Newest or Top 100 to help you find the best or the most popular books.

Freetechbooks.com – Check out Freetechbooks.com for specialized technical subject books such as engineering, computer science, and so on. These books are offered for free but not in Kindle format. You can, however, convert them into free Kindle books in the appropriate format.

Librivox.org – A great source of audiobooks if you prefer to have books read to you instead of reading them. Kindle 2 and Kindle DX supports some audio formats so you may also want to check out some audiobooks.

Kindle-Ready vs. Non Kindle-Ready Books

Most of the time, free non-Kindle ebooks are provided in DOC or PDF format. Unfortunately, the PDF format is supported on the Kindle DX, but not on the Kindle 1st generation or Kindle 2. To use PDF formats on the original Kindle devices, you can use a converter to turn it into a format readable by the device.

Share

Firenze Sage: Chimera or racism?

Margo Hendricks, Univ. of CA at Santa Cruz professor in Literature for 20 years, says that racism is alive and well on the campus during her tenure. Statistics on Ratemyprofessors.com show that retiring UCSC professor Hendricks is viewed as unorganized, self centered and fails to listen.

Share
Racism at Univ. of CA at Santa Cruz?

The fact that racism has been alive and well on the campus during my tenure at UCSC has never escaped me,” she [Margo Hendricks] wrote. “Students, staff and faculty of African American descent (regardless of color) experience subtle and not so subtle attacks in the classroom, in evaluations, and personnel actions.”

Thus spake Margo Hendricks who provides no evidence to support her rant, but expects millions or billions to be spent to alleviate her complaint.

Of note the website “Ratemyprofessors.com” is almost universal in the view that she is unorganized, self centered, and fails to listen.

A recent rally at UCSC demanded a more diversified student body so that ethnic groups at the school reflect the same percentage as the population as a whole.

This is the same campus, UCSC, that awarded Black Panther Huey Newton a PhD, [cop killer tried several times for murder and later convicted of embezzling money from programs he created for black children] and employs in positions of authority Stalinist thinking Angela Davis and sister Bettina Aptheker.

Racist graffiti is unfortunate but hardly cataclysmic. Some paint remover would solve more problems than a giant new affirmative action plan.

by FirenzieSage48@gmail.com
————————————————–

For persons who do not know who Huey Newton is, here is some info:

Huey Newton proved to be as violent as the party he helped to create when he was thrust into the national limelight in October 1967; accused of murdering Oakland police officer John Frey. In September 1968 Newton was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and was sentenced to two to 15 years in prison. In May 1970 the California Appellate Court reversed Newton’s conviction and ordered a new trial. After two more trials the State of California dropped its case against Newton, citing technicalities including the judge’s failure to relay proper instructions to the jury.

After his release from prison Newton overhauled the Black Panther Party, revised its program, and changed its rhetoric. While he had been imprisoned, party membership had decreased significantly in several cities, and the FBI had started a campaign to disrupt and eventually bring down the Black Panthers. Abandoning its Marxist-Leninist ideology, Newton now concentrated on community survival programs. The Black Panthers sponsored a free breakfast program for children, sickle-cell anemia tests, free food and shoes, and a school, the Samuel Napier Intercommunal Youth Institute. However, as before, the Black Panthers were not without controversy. Funding for several of their programs were raised as the result of the co-operation of drug dealers and prostitution rings.

Newton tried to shed his image as a firebreathing revolutionary, but he continued to have difficulty with the police. In 1974 several assault charges were filed against him, and he was also accused of murdering a 17-year-old prostitute, Kathleen Smith. Newton failed to make his court appearance. His bail was revoked, a bench warrant issued, and his name added to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s most wanted list. Newton had jumped bail and escaped to Cuba, where he spent three years in exile. In Cuba he worked as a machinist and teacher. He returned home in 1977 to face murder charges because, he said, the climate in the United States had changed and he believed he could get a fair trial. He was acquitted of the murder of Kathleen Smith after two juries were deadlocked.

In addition to organizing the Black Panther Party and serving as its minister of defense, Newton unsuccessfully ran for Congress as a candidate of the Peace and Freedom Party in 1968. In 1971, between his second and third trials for the murder of John Frey, he visited China for ten days, where he met with Premier Chou En-lai and Chiang Ch’ing, the wife of Chairman Mao Tse-tung. While there he was offered political asylum. Newton studied for a Ph.D. in the history of social consciousness at the University of California in 1978. In 1985 the 43-year-old Newton was arrested for embezzling state and federal funds from the Black Panthers’ community education and nutrition programs. In 1989 he was convicted of embezzling funds from a school run by the Black Panthers, supposedly to support his alcohol and drug addictions. By this time the Panthers had turned to less violent activism. On August 22, 1989, Newton was gunned down by a drug dealer, ironically in the same city streets of Oakland that saw the rise of the Black Panthers 23 years ago. Bill Turque in Newsweek described a sad but appropriate farewell: “A small florist’s card, resting with bouquets of red gladiolus’s and white dahlias on a chain-link fence near the shooting scene, summed it up: ‘Huey: for the early years.'”

Share

Firenzie Sage: In the beginning there was this gay caveman… i-PAD app coming?

Main Kinder students get $500 i-PADS to learn ABCs. California students required to learn gay, lesbbian history. So maybe its time for a I-PAD app: “In the beginnning there was thsi gay caveman…”

Share

Time ripe for an i-PAD app “In the beginning there was this gay caveman …”

The California state Senate has approved legislation that requires California’s public schools to include gay history in social studies lessons.

Will they budget for field trips to public restrooms?

This fall, the school district in Auburn, Maine will hand out iPads to nearly 300 kindergartners, “confident the education apps will accelerate their learning.” Let see, give 5 year olds a game player and expect them to read, spell, and do math.

written by Firenzie Sage48@gmail.com

Share

“Easter” egg hunt changed to “Spring Celebration with Bunny”. What happened to the Resurection?

Easter eggs not politically correct? Come on now!

Share

“A Seattle public school has decided that Easter eggs are super offensive and not politically correct. They’ve renamed them Spring Spheres — even though eggs are not spheres.”

“In my old hometown in New Jersey the town Easter egg hunt was changed to “Spring Celebration. With Bunny.”

It may only get worse. Stay tuned.

Share

Yes we love our public school teachers – but can we afford them? Is teacher pay related to academic performance? What to do?

drcameronjackson@gmail.com

Does high pay for public school teachers translate into better educated students? Nope.

Here are two examples:

1) Wisconsin teachers have been in the news as Wisconsin pays the highest wages in that part of the United States. Info below about Wisconsin shows pay of teachers is not related to academic performance of students.

2) Mountain View-Los Altos (MVLA) teachers are the highest paid in California. MVLA students do perform substantially higher than the average for California. However, none of the MVLA schools receive top ratings based on STAR ratings.

So, from the taxpayers perspective, if teacher pay cannot be shown to relate to student academic performance — what changes need to be made?

Hypothetically, let’s assume that every California teacher in MVLA is a superb teacher. [ I personally know one superb, dedicated, highly trained MVLA high school teacher. Further, I have worked with many superb California public school teachers over a 10+ period.]

If all California MVLA teachers are suburb, is that excellence in teaching visible via school ratings? One way to rate schools is to look at STAR test results.

The STAR testing for 2010 shows that Mountain View High School for English Language Arts obtained a score of 75% compared to 45% for the state average. The High School Summative Math for 2010 for Mountain View High School is 98% compared to a score of 76% for the state. Frankly, the STAR numbers have always bemused me because they are not standardized scores. But for sure, the numbers show that Mountain View High School in the MVLA school district performs much better than the California state average.

A web site called schooldigger.com lists all the California schools in order of ranking using STAR test results. None of the schools in the MVLA school district made the top ten according to digger.com For example, Lowell High in San Francisco got the #10 rating (out of 600+) and Monte Vista High in Fremont Union High school district got a #2 rating. Pacifica Collegiate Charter, located in Santa Cruz, CA got the #3 place

Back to the original question: Why are MVLA teachers paid the highest in the state of California?

My guess is: location, location, location. The Mountain View-Los Altos school district is located in Silicon Valley known worldwide for computer and high tech companies. Silicon Valley real estate is very valuable and that value translates into millions of dollars available to pay public schools.

Back to California: The first day that Jerry Brown was on the job as governor in California he replaced 6-7 persons on the board that permits charter schools. Charter schools in California are competition for the public school system. Gov. Brown wants to gut charter schools which means kill competition for the public schools. Why kill competition? Money from the teacher unions goes into the Democratic Party which supported his candidacy.

California Silicon Valley high schools – from Palo Alto south to San Jose — graduate plenty of smart, able to compete anywhere students. Is it because of excellence in teaching or is it because of the home life and general environment wherein these high school students live?

My guess is that nature (genetics) and nurture (family environment) account for more than 75 to 80 percent of why Silicon Valley students excel. And, yes, there are many excellent, dedicated teachers who do a superb job. So let’s say that all factors contribute. But is the pay (plus benefits, health care and retirement costs) that teachers receive worth to the public the overall results that obtain? That is a question many people are raising.

They may be great teachers but can the public afford them?

From my perspective, the time has come to scale back the influence of the teachers unions. Teacher pay must be tied directly to academic performance. Poor teachers must be identified and let go. The tenure system should go. The tenure system hurts those who are beginning and those who want to move elsewhere.

Conclusions: It’s not an argument about whether there are wonderful, dedicated, highly trained public school teachers who do a terrific job. Yes there are. But at what price? Can taxpayers afford them?

In my view the public school system is broken and major changes must occur. What say you? What changes do you suggest?
———————————————————————
Below are some resources:
____________________
“According to data released by the state Department of Education this month and compiled by the Sacramento Bee, teachers in the Mountain View-Los Altos High School District are the highest paid in the state.“We have the best teachers in the state and they deserve to be paid well,” said Superintendent Barry Groves.
The Bee’s report, which examined districts with more than 100 teachers, said MVLA pays an average of $95,365 a year, with the lowest earning $61,184 and the highest $115,616.“We value our beginning teachers,” Groves said in regards to the starting salary, adding that they are an “investment.”
He said one reason for the high pay scale is that the district attracts and retains experienced teachers.

According to 2008-09 data from Ed Data, a collaborative Web site that analyzes data provided by the state, MVLA teachers averaged 11.2 years of teaching experience and 9.3 years with the district. Twenty-three of the district’s 193 teachers, or about 12 percent, were first or second year teachers.
But when compared to county and state figures, it appears that in terms of teacher experience and longevity with a district, MVLA is only comparable, rather than noticeably higher.
Joe White, associate superintendent of business, said another factor is the cost of living in the area.
“When you put a blanket across the state or various parts of Northern California it makes it look like, ‘Wow there’s a huge difference,'” White said. “But there’s a huge cost of living here.” He added that many employees, including himself, commute from other areas to work in the district.
For Superintendent Groves, the chief issue was teacher quality.
“I believe that MVLA has a cadre of professional, highly qualified teachers in every academic discipline,” Groves wrote in an e-mail. “As we have high standards for achieving tenure in our district, we believe that our teaching staff is second to none. Our students and their families profit by this incredible group of professionals.”

According to the state data, teachers in the Mountain View Whisman School District make an average of $61,147 annually. The lowest pay offered in that district is $44,609, while the highest is $82,315.
In the Los Altos School District, teachers earn between $44,832 and $86,924, with an average salary of $73,569.
__________________________________________

Palo Alto Unified School District
2009-2010
Teachers’ Salary Schedule
Step BA 15 30 45 60 75 90
1 51422 51422 51422 52586 55025 57355 59510
2 51422 51422 53649 56347 58969 61401 63599
3 51422 53738 56902 59796 62595 65113 67398
4 52768 56484 59850 62962 65941 68551 70935
5 55025 59015 62636 65886 69051 71762 74245
6 57083 61359 65203 68636 71988 74781 77313
7 59057 63559 68409 71580 74753 77924 81092
8 60934 65613 70779 73947 77116 80289 83464
9 62734 67628 73149 76317 79492 82661 85830
10 62734 67628 75516 78689 81860 85027 88202
11 62734 67628 75516 78689 84307 87543 90568
12 62734 67628 75516 78689 84307 87543 90568
CI-1 62734 67628 77882 81055 86673 89909 92934
CI-2 62734 67628 80248 83421 89039 92275 95300
CI-3 62734 67628 82614 85787 91045 94641 97666
CI-4 62734 67628 82614 85787 94490 97726 100751
CI-5 62734 67628 82614 85787 94490 97726 103836
Career Increments
13, 16, 20 2,366
25, 30 3,085
Masters Degree 1,982
2nd Masters Degree 1,982
Doctoral Degree 1,982
NBPTS / CCC 2,571
Approved November 17, 2009
Download a copy of the Teacher Salary Schedule ( 90KB ).

Questions surface over LASD teacher salaries and benefits
Written by Traci Newell – Staff Writer/tracin@latc.com
TUESDAY, 15 MARCH 2011

The Los Altos School District is preparing to ask for an additional $193 parcel tax in May, prompting some residents to question district teachers’ salary and benefits packages.
The average teacher salary in the district is $73,569, third highest among the 20 elementary school districts in Santa Clara County. Local salaries run higher because the majority of teachers in the Los Altos School District have been teaching here for a long time, thus earning seniority, said Randy Kenyon, assistant superintendent for business services.
The average starting salary for district teachers, $44,832, ranks 14th in the county, and the average for teachers in the district for 10 years, $69,334, ranks 13th.
Not all district teachers receive lifetime health-care benefits, an allegation recently lodged by attendees at several public-comment sessions at school board meetings. Teachers hired after 1989 do not receive any health benefits after retiring from the district.
Kenyon said that providing lifetime health benefits for teachers used to be standard practice, particularly when health insurance was more affordable. By the late 1980s, however, district officials conducted a study and determined they couldn’t absorb the cost of extended health insurance for employees.
The district continues to pay for benefits for those teachers hired before 1989, an estimated 180 of whom are retired and 40 current employees scheduled to receive coverage upon retirement.
The district spent approximately $1 million to cover health-insurance costs for its retired employees in the 2010-2011 budget. Over the next 30-40 years, Kenyon said projections (which include hikes in insurance costs) indicate the district would spend $19.3 million, until the benefits expire.
The structure of Los Altos School District teachers’ health-benefits packages differs slightly from the neighboring Cupertino Union School District. Teachers in the Los Altos district pay 5 percent of their packages, while Cupertino teachers pay 30 percent of their benefits.
Given the economic climate, Los Altos teachers have made concessions over the past few years. Last year teachers agreed to take three furlough days, a reduction of approximately $1,200, or 1.6 percent, in their salaries. Teachers have not had an across-the-board salary increase since the 2007-2008 school year, when compensation was upped 1 percent.
In addition to monetary concessions, teachers have assumed additional duties during the economic downturn. Since the 2008-2009 school year, the district has lost 13.51 full-time-equivalent teaching positions, with the remaining teachers assuming the workload.
As the district readies to issue approximately 50 pink slips this week (story on Page 1), teachers are preparing to further accommodate the budgetary limitations.
“Overall, the teachers always feel the need to help out when teachers’ jobs are at stake,” said Jim Grijalva, president of the Los Altos Teacher’s Association. “We are all in this together.”
The Los Altos Teacher’s Association bargaining unit met with school district officials Friday, reopening negotiations on the 2011-2012 budget – which was already agreed upon last spring.
In the meantime, local teachers are working on the parcel-tax campaign, hoping to relieve the district’s ongoing revenue woes.
Kenyon said the financial situation the district faces – a $4.5 million cut – isn’t because of teachers’ salaries and benefits.
“It’s about huge funding cuts,” he said.
Concessions from the teaching staff may represent only one piece of the deficit puzzle. While the district awaits word on passage of the May parcel tax, which requires a two-thirds majority and would supply an additional $2.3 million annually, supporters are pleading with local legislators to help place Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposed tax extension on the June ballot. If voters pass a tax extension, which requires only a simple majority, the district stands to receive $1.5 million.
The fourteen remaining teachers who qualify for life time health benefits have not been paying into Medicare like the teachers hired after 1986. Therefore, they will not likely qualify for Medicare. These senior teachers have earned their benefit and the district may not change these benefits according to law. The total cost of teacher salary and benefits is lower today than it was in 08-09, even with the increase in health premiums.
As Randy Kenyon has stated, public schools in this state have a revenue problem. Every other problem faced by public schools pale by comparison.
Concessions by school district employees can help, but will not solve these revenue problems. The employees through their hard work, dedication and commitment to a quality education deserve a fair compensation package. Any notion that the employees are over compensated for their work is not a reality. The health benefits are good, but nine districts in our county still pay their teachers more.

Share

Given a choice, teachers will opt out of paying union dues http://freedomOK.net

Where teachers have been given choice to not pay union dues they opt out in huge numbers.

“Three weeks ago, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill restricting the power of public-employee unions and increasing what their members pay for health and pension benefits. But the law hasn’t yet taken effect—and its opponents have found a judge to issue a highly questionable ruling threatening sanctions against any official who implements it. It seems “Wisconsin Nice” is now gone with the wind.

It began in February, when 14 Democratic senators left the state in order to avoid giving Republicans the quorum they needed to pass Mr. Walker’s bill. Unions bused in thousands of members and supporters to protest it. Death threats were made against several legislators (on Thursday, felony charges were filed against one woman for allegedly emailing legislators about plans for “putting a nice little bullet in your head.”)

After four weeks, Republicans finally passed the bill after amending it so it required a smaller quorum. The Democratic senators returned, but promptly backed a blizzard of lawsuits to block the bill from taking effect.

They found an ally in Judge Maryann Sumi of Dane County. She issued a restraining order against publication of the law, arguing that it was likely that plaintiffs would prove it was passed without the required notice in the state’s Open Meetings Law. On Thursday, she followed up with an order declaring the law “not in effect.”

Legal analysts say it’s preposterous for a judge to enjoin publication of a law before it has even taken effect, as citizens don’t have standing to challenge a law until they are subject to it. In a similar case in 1943, the state’s Supreme Court ruled that a judge had no such authority. In 1977, another state Supreme Court opinion reiterated that under separation of powers “no court has jurisdiction to enjoin the legislative process at any point.” Rick Esenberg, an assistant professor of law at Marquette University, says he is “speechless” over the fact that Judge Sumi “has failed to articulate why she has the authority” to issue her ruling.

View Full Image

Associated Press

JoAnne Kloppenburg and Justice David Prosser
.The case will ultimately be decided by the state Supreme Court. That’s why unions and liberal groups are now pouring millions into TV ads to try to oust Justice David Prosser—a member of the court’s 4-to-3 conservative majority—in an election next Tuesday.

Victory would mean a seat on the court for JoAnne Kloppenburg, an assistant state attorney general—and a court with a liberal majority that may well uphold Judge Sumi’s decision.

Liberal groups are doing all they can to politicize this judicial race. An American Federation of Teachers local has sent a letter to its members asserting that “a Kloppenburg victory would swing the balance (on the court) to our side. A vote for Prosser is a vote for [Gov.] Walker.” It is time, the letter says, “to get even.” Ms. Kloppenburg certainly isn’t discouraging such thinking. She told the Madison Capital Times that “the events of the last few weeks have put into sharp relief how important the Supreme Court is as a check on overreach in the other branches of government.”

Why are the unions and their liberal allies so desperate to block Mr. Walker’s reforms? It’s all about the money. Unions can’t abide the loss of political clout that will result from ending the state’s practice of automatically deducting union dues from employee paychecks. For most Wisconsin public employees, union dues total between $700 and $1,000 a year, much of which is funneled into political spending to elect the officials who negotiate their contracts.

Union officials recognize what can happen if dues payments become voluntary. Robert Chanin, who was general counsel of the National Education Association from 1968 to 2009, said in a U.S. District Court oral argument in 1978 that “it is well-recognized that if you take away the mechanism of payroll deduction, you won’t collect a penny from these people, and it has nothing to do with voluntary or involuntary. I think it has to do with the nature of the beast, and the beasts who are our teachers . . . simply don’t come up with the money regardless of the purpose.”

There is evidence to back up his fears. In 2001, Utah made the collection of payments to union political funds optional, and nearly 95% of public school teachers opted not to pay. In 2005, Indiana GOP Gov. Mitch Daniels limited collective-bargaining rights for public employees, and today only 5% of state employees pay union dues.

Some union supporters recognize the problems with coercive dues payments. Tom Geoghegan, a noted union lawyer, wrote in the Nation magazine last November that it should be “a civil right to join, or not to join, a labor union.” He said it was time to “repackage labor law reform, even over the protest of organized labor itself.” He noted that workers in countries “like Germany are free not to pay [their dues]—and many don’t.” Indeed, the U.S. is filled with powerful groups, such as the American Association of Retired Persons, that thrive on voluntary payments because they are seen as providing genuine services to members.

Even Ms. Kloppenburg, the favored candidate of unions, doesn’t like paying mandatory dues. In 2009, she responded to a survey by saying the Wisconsin Bar Association should become “voluntary.” Then it would be “better situated and motivated to be more transparent, be more accountable, be more responsive.” She went on to say that government attorneys such as herself “do not benefit as much as private attorneys from the non-reimbursed dues that we pay.”

In an interview on Friday, Gov. Walker told me that dues money and union power is “the real issue” in opposition to his reform. “After it became clear we were serious, they couldn’t wait to throw their members under the bus by saying they could live with higher contributions for health and pension benefits,” he said. “The issue they wouldn’t bend on was the power collective bargaining gives them on dues.”

Share

Reduce dependency on government by accurate assessment of children ages 3-21 who receive Social Security Disability benefits.

Cut the deficit and encourage self sufficiency at the same time. How? Review and thin out Social Security Disability (SSI-D) benefits to children ages 3 to 21. Too often schools classify children as “mentally retarded” or “intellectually deficient” when they are not. Too often those children end up in Special Day Class (SDC) placements all through school. SDC placements cost roughly 1/3 of the budget for Pajaro Valley Unified School District (PVUSD). Time for those not on the dole to encourage independence and reduce the costs of SSI-D.

Share

Roughly 1 in 6 persons get a check in the mail from the government. That’s a huge number of people dependent on the government. It’s time to reduce that dependency.

Lots of people think that it’s wrong to cut social security. Yes, it’s wrong to cut benefits to those who paid into SSI, have retired and who rely on social security.

How to responsibly cut the federal deficit and encourage independence? Time to trim Social Security Disability benefits (SSI-D) to children and youth ages 3-21. Let’s reduce SSI-D payments to children and youth 1) assessed inaccurately or 2) who have “out grown” their diagnosis. Children change rapidly. Assessments should be accurate and up to date.

Another way to cut government deficits is to require proof of citizenship to obtain government funded services such as the regional center services. (The regional centers serve persons with low cognitive IQ abilities, requiring treatment similar to persons with low cognitive IQ, autism, seizures and cerebral palsy.)

Some people fly in from abroad or cross our border s so that their children can receive substantial government paid regional center benefits. No proof of citizenship is required to obtain regional center services which serves about 180,000 + persons in California. In the last 10 years the percentage of Hispanic clients has increased from 23 to 28 percent and whites have dropped from 51% to 42%. About 45% of those served are age 3-21.

There are too many children labeled mentally retarded by the public schools who are not slow and who can learn to read and write. The schools wrongfully label them and wrongfully keep them in more restricted placements than they need. These placements – Special Day Class (SDS) – are extremely expensive. In the Pajaro Valley Unified School District (PVUSD) roughly one third of the costs of special education go for SDS separate classes. Children can – and routinely are — labeled by the public schools with “mental retardation” without any assessment of their cognitive IQ and functional abilities. Their school records are reviewed by SSI-Disability and – lo and behold — children are put on SSI-Disability.

Just as unions representing government workers need to be re-certified yearly and workers given a choice whether to pay dues and/or be in a union, likewise children labeled “disabled” need to be routinely re-examined by independent assessors and parents given accurate information and more choice.

Most – but not all — parents want their children to grow up to be self sufficient individuals able to contribute to society. Unfortunately, there are some parents that prefer dependency for their child and themselves and happily seek checks in the mail.

That’s why those not on the government dole must do what we can to encourage independence and reward self sufficiency.

Take a look at the budget for your local school district. What percent goes for Special Day Class (SDC) placements? Who actually checks to see that children receiving special education services are actually re-assessed with standardized tests every three years?

Parents and taxpayers can and should require a random audit of special education records for their school district. What tests placed that child in special education and what tests show that those services need to continue? If no progress in academic skills, why not?

Why not tie teacher pay increases to showing reasonable progress in academic skills for all students — including special education students. What say you?

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share

Some (SDC) special education students in California (PVUSD) with normal abilities are never taught to read or write. Why? What to do?

Taxpayers must require accountability for costs of special education. Vouchers and charter schools can create more accountability. Some special education students are placed in the most restricted placement — Special Day Class (SDC) — and are never re-assessed as to progres made. Children with normal IQs placed in SDC languish there for years.

Share

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com
Every child with an Individual Education Plan (IEP) needs regular measurement of the child’s abilities to see if the IEP “fits”, or if the child has “outgrown” it or that it is not appropriate and needs to be changed. Regular measurement of the child’s progress typically is done every three years.

But some children’s IEPs are never “measured” again after the initial placement in a Special Day Class (SDC) placement — the most restricted educational placement. That’s wrong. It harms the child. It wastes money. The system must be more accountable.

What to do? Taxpayers speak up!

Maybe its time that parents of special education students got vouchers that followed their disabled students and could apply for any school of their choice? When parents of children of special education have more choice it’s highly likely that the quality of the education will improve.

Maybe it’s time for taxpayers to require that all California special education students are assessed very year as to progress made toward expected goals in reading, writing and arithmetic. And maybe it’s time to tie teacher pay to progress made by special education students.

It’s often the case that Special Day Class (SDC) students stay in the same class with the same teachers and aides for 2-3 years in a row. And too frequently there is no regular assessment of SDC students with standardized measures.

Some special education students in California go through 12 years of public education with minimal initial measurement of their abilities using standardized tests. Once a child is retained that child is typically passed on year after year whether or not that child has made any progress in reading and writing.

If you are a special education student in California you are about 1/2 as likely to become Proficient or higher in reading. Forty percent of California general ed students are Proficient compared to 20% of special education students. Of course, that highlights that 60% of California students are not proficient in reading.

In 2007-08 the national average per cost of student was $7,268. California paid a bit more than the national average — $8,853 — and had a ranking of 43. That means that only 7 states were lower than CA in ranking.

The County Office of Education (COE) in Santa Cruz spends $24,600 per student. COE receives 6.2 million for 252 students.

The biggest special education cost is for separate classes for students in a Special Day Class placement. One third of the special education budget went to pay for separate classes in 2006-2007.

Think of a pie cut into thirds. One-third of the special education “pie” goes to pay for separate classes for the Special Day Class (SDC) students. So why not take that 1/3 of the pie and turn it over to parents to create Alternative SDC Voucher Placements? I bet parent-run classes would require more progress in reading, writing and arithmetic.

California spends 20% more on special education student than the nation as a whole, partly due to higher wage costs. Targeted federal, state and local funds totaled $4.7 billion in 2006-07 to defray the additonal costs associated with special education.

If you are a parent with a child in a SDC placement in California it’s time that you required your school to regularly show progress based on standardized measures. Alternative methods of testing do not give you –or the taxpyers paying– the information needed to show that the public is getting value for money spent.

What say you? Time that parents with children in special education got vouchers? I think so. DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share

Aptos, CA psychologist: Does nature (genes) and nurture (enviornment) account for why lots of Palo Alto, CA and Mountain View, CA students excel? Or do they excel because they have the highest paid teachers in California? Does highest paid teachers = best teachers? Think of Wisconsin where 2 out of 3 students in 8th grade are not proficient in reading although the highest paid in that area of U.S.

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Why might the teachers in the Mountain View – Aptos High School district be paid the most in California?

Might it have anything to do with private Stanford University which is located in the heart of Palo Alto, California? Berkeley has CAL but apparently the teachers in Berkeley, California are not as good as those in the Palo Alto-Aptos District since Berkeley, California teachers make less money.

Palo Alto, California is OLD money… not like Berkeley. Mountain View, California is filled with Asians from all over the world. They are attracted to the Silicon Valley and the computer industry in that area.

The Aptos – Mountain View are the best — so they say — and hence are paid the highest wages. What say you?

Just thinking about the teachers that have been on strike in Wisconsin. The teachers in Wisconsin are the highest paid int that region of the U.S. Yet, only 1 in 3 8th grade students in Wisconsin can read proficiently Which means that two out of three (two-thirds) of students in Wisconsin cannot read proficiently — even though they have the highest paid teachers. And Wisconsin teachers/ public sector employees spent 2 weeks of protesting that they be asked to contribute to their health care and retirement.

As a tax payer, what percent of health benefits do Mountain View – Aptos High School teachers pay? And what do they have to pay into their retirement fund? The first day that Jerry Brown was on the job as governor in California he replaced 6-7 persons on the board that permits charter schools. Charter schools in California are competition for the public school system.

Obviously Gov. Brown wants to gut charter schools which means kill competition for the public schools. It appears that Gov. Brown wants the California teacher unions to keep on dong what they have been doing — turning out mediocre students at a high price to the tax payer.

On the other hand, some high schools in California graduate a lot of smart, able to compete anywhere students. Is it because of the public school teachers or is it because of the home life and general environment wherein these high school students live?

Do students in the Palo Alto – Mountain View excel because they have the highest paid California public school teachers? Doubtful. My guess is that nature (genetics) and nurture (family environment) account for more than 75 to 80 percent of why the Palo Alto – Mountain View students excel. New from the Voice, Express

“According to data released by the state Department of Education this month and compiled by the Sacramento Bee, teachers in the Mountain View-Los Altos High School District are the highest paid in the state.“We have the best teachers in the state and they deserve to be paid well,” said Superintendent Barry Groves.

The Bee’s report, which examined districts with more than 100 teachers, said MVLA pays an average of $95,365 a year, with the lowest earning $61,184 and the highest $115,616.“We value our beginning teachers,” Groves said in regards to the starting salary, adding that they are an “investment.”

He said one reason for the high pay scale is that the district attracts and retains experienced teachers.

According to 2008-09 data from Ed Data, a collaborative Web site that analyzes data provided by the state, MVLA teachers averaged 11.2 years of teaching experience and 9.3 years with the district. Twenty-three of the district’s 193 teachers, or about 12 percent, were first or second year teachers.

But when compared to county and state figures, it appears that in terms of teacher experience and longevity with a district, MVLA is only comparable, rather than noticeably higher.

Joe White, associate superintendent of business, said another factor is the cost of living in the area.

“When you put a blanket across the state or various parts of Northern California it makes it look like, ‘Wow there’s a huge difference,'” White said. “But there’s a huge cost of living here.” He added that many employees, including himself, commute from other areas to work in the district.
For Superintendent Groves, the chief issue was teacher quality.

“I believe that MVLA has a cadre of professional, highly qualified teachers in every academic discipline,” Groves wrote in an e-mail. “As we have high standards for achieving tenure in our district, we believe that our teaching staff is second to none. Our students and their families profit by this incredible group of professionals.”

According to the state data, teachers in the Mountain View Whisman School District make an average of $61,147 annually. The lowest pay offered in that district is $44,609, while the highest is $82,315.

In the Los Altos School District, teachers earn between $44,832 and $86,924, with an average salary of $73,569.
Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.

——————————————————————————–
Comments
Posted by Ted, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 3, 2010 at 6:45 pm

The side-by-side comparisons are misleading. You compare the HS district against the elementary districts, suggesting there is some correlation.

MVWSD are among the lowest paid teachers while their administrators are among the higher paid! Compare their salaries to other local elementary salaries.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Jess, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 3, 2010 at 7:15 pm

and on top of Ted’s comment…. Los Altos School Disitrict (K-8) is amoung the LOWEST paid in Santa Clara County!

They have one been in the top 10 elementary school districts in the entire state yet they are one of the lowest paying in the county! Doesn’t make sense. Poor teachers (literally)

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Scot Lee, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 10:32 am

I live in Mt. View but teach High School in San Jose. Based on averages (I’m an eleven year teacher) MVLA High School District teachers are making in excess of 25K more a year than teachers in Eastside Union High School District. I hope we all keep that in mind before pushing another parcel tax for schools down home owners throats/.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Neighbor, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 2:31 pm

@Ted – I’m confused. Which is the high school district and which is the elementary school district? (and why are they different?)

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Anonymous, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 2:43 pm

As a teacher in the Mountain View High School district I must say that the level of professionlism in the district is very high. MVHS is ranked among the top 3% of schools in the entire country and we have a very hard working, dedicated staff. Many teachers are at work before 7am and do not leave until well after 4pm. We come in on the weekends, work on lessons at night, and collaborate during the summer. Compared to many other professionals in other industries we make less money and have to deal with more scrutiny. I am thankful that my salary allows me to live and help to support my family in this community and I only wish that hard working teachers in other districts could be paid what they deserve for committing their lives to such a challenging profession.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by parent, a resident of the Waverly Park neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 2:50 pm

In response to Jess – “Los Altos School Disitrict (K-8) is amoung the LOWEST paid in Santa Clara County!”

According to the story, LASD’s average is $73,569. The low is $44,832 and the high is $86,924. Whereas, MVWSD’s average is $61,147. The low is $77,609, and the high is $82,315. The number clearly shows LASD’s pay is higher than the MVWSD by over $4,000 on the high end. Let’s stick to the facts.

One of the reason the pay is lower in wealthy districts such as LASD, and Cupertino is because the school demographic is made up of more educated families; thereby, allowing teachers to focus on teaching and not on non-educational related issues. Bottom line is that their work load is less than other districts.

LASD has several parcel taxes which the money goes to providing student related programs.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by jane, a resident of the North Whisman neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 2:53 pm

Teachers by and large are so dedicated and hard-working — I am thankful that there is a district that can pay them close to what they are worth!

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by KD, a resident of the Waverly Park neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 3:26 pm

Salary is only a portion of a teacher’s compensation.

A 65 year old male teacher in California, earning $100,000 a year retires after 30 years service with a (taxpayer guaranteed) pension of $75,000 a year.

Web Link

What is that worth?

Well, at current rates, it costs $1,000,000 to purchase a $75,000 life annuity with survivor benefits (assume he has a 60 year old wife).

Web Link

It would take $1,400,000 (before tax) to build up a $1,000,000 401k nest egg. Over 30 years that’s $46,000 a year (ignoring the impact of present valuing, etc)

Think about it.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Bob, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 3:58 pm

Anonymous:

Wow you guys work from before 7 to after 4!. Isn’t that just a standard 8 hour day? And you collaborate in the summer (when you’re not working!). …hardly matches the work load of professionals in other fields.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by CHW, a resident of the North Whisman neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 4:01 pm

Besides good pension, teachers do not work 12 months a year. They get the summer off.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Ann, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 8:21 pm

Dear Anonymous – your account of working from 7am to past 4pm, and even during the summer – undermines the veracity of any claim you have tried to put forth about going an extra mile.

The truth is that most folks work 8-hour days, through the summer, and make less than MVLAHS teachers.

I agree with Scot Lee: I am not at all inclined to support another parcel tax.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by huh?, a resident of the Blossom Valley neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 10:50 pm

parent-

the salaries are all over the map and if anything, it looks like the MORE educated the parents, the higher the salary… look at the ‘bachelors + 60’ salary for what appears to be the closest to apples-to-apples comparison. I highly doubt teachers in the Palo Alto ($82k), Menlo City ($82k), Hillsborough ($86k) and Las Lomitas ($101k) districts have a more difficult caseload than San Jose ($71k), San Francisco ($64k), Ravenswood City ($62k), South San Francisco ($62k) and Oakland ($54k) districts. It is unbelievable that Oakland pays half the salary of Las Lomitas for what appears to be the same level of education. I would offer that compared to similar communities up and down the peninsula, the Los Altos Elementary district underpays by quite a bit.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by huh?, a resident of the Blossom Valley neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010 at 10:55 pm

I do not doubt for a moment that teachers work long hours (my sister-in-law is a teacher and brings her work home almost every night and often on weekends). I’ll withhold judgement on future parcel taxes until I read the language of the proposal.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Anonymous, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 5, 2010 at 7:25 am

In response to the number of hours I wrote before 7-4, I would like to clarify a few things: I said before 7am and well after 4pm. Many days I leave work at 5pm or later, I have only one or two free lunch times a week where I can get some work done, but most of the time I am helping students. This makes for a 9+ hour day almost every single day with no breaks. In addition, I also stated that “we come in on the weekends, work on lessons at night, and collaborate during the summer.” I can’t remember a single weekend during the school year or the summer that I didn’t do lesson planning, grading, collaboration, or some other form of professional growth. Most weekends, I work on Saturday AND Sunday. Most evenings, after dinner, I am lesson planning and grading. Also, many of my colleagues have a second job in the summer or teach summer school to make ends meet… and most of them still can’t afford a house in Mountain View.

Please be respectful of how hard teachers work and don’t think that we just collect a paycheck and lay about in the summertime.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Castro Mom, a resident of the Castro City neighborhood, on Feb 6, 2010 at 5:21 pm

I love the teachers at my daughter’s school! They work hard, the principal is available to talk with, even if only for a moment, as she is usually so busy. We have a faculty and staff who seem to do their best to put the students first. These people earn every penny they get!! As for the summers off, I don’t think so!! I know many who work other jobs, and teach summer school–although even that perk for our students has pretty much gone by the wayside. Anyone who thinks a teacher in the MVWSD sits idly by in the summer, is out of touch!!

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by I’m a mom, a resident of the Cuesta Park neighborhood, on Feb 7, 2010 at 9:12 am

Teachers work amazingly hard. Don’t let anyone fool you! They take their work home nightly and worry about their students daily. On the weekends, they are in their classrooms on the weekend. Sitting around in the summer? Most of the teachers need to take classes and workshops and plan for the coming year. Their class sizes are getting bigger and parents are getting much more demanding. Classes are full of children with special needs (thank you no child left behind) and teachers are struggling to teach to the wide range of students who are entering elementary school. The Mountain View and Los Altos School District teachers should be compensated equally to the high school teachers. The elementary school’s are the building blocks for those successful students down the road. It is too bad the Superintendents and School Boards of both those district’s don’t value their teachers like the MVLA high school district. It’s a shame!

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by DCS, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 7, 2010 at 9:20 am

Anonymous:

I worked 15 hour days/weekends/summers in a technical profession and still did not receive this type of compensation. Your compensation is extremely good. Be thanful for what you have.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by InTheKnow, a resident of the Blossom Valley neighborhood, on Feb 7, 2010 at 3:50 pm

Teachers’ summers are WITHOUT PAY, as are vacations! Teachers may opt to draw their salaries over 10 or 12 months, giving the impression that we are paid during the summer, but we are not. We do not have three months off during the summer; that it a common misconception. We are unpaid when we continue to work in our classrooms at year’s end, and we are unpaid for the days, often weeks, we come in to set up our rooms to make them a pleasing place in which to be. We plan as grade level partners and as individuals. As an elementary school teacher, I typically put in a 60 – 80 hour work week. I spend hundreds of dollars of my own money every year on classroom supplies, materials, and books for my students. Fortunately, I love teaching. But the disparity between the pay between elementary and high school is not right. Nor is our salary adequate.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by another teacher, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 8, 2010 at 5:17 pm

About the misconceptions I hear everyday regarding teacher’s retirement pensions,…. a large portion of my monthly salary is sent to STRS, and it is not matched by the school district. It’s similar to buying an annuity, and the payout is determined in part by the option I choose (less money in order to provide monthly income to a spouse if I pass on first.) Otherwise my survivor receives a very small final sum. If I outlive the average person, it’s a good deal, but if I die younger, it’s not. That’s the way insurance works. If teachers have good pensions, it’s because they are required to save not because the public is gifting them undeserved largess.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Evan, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Feb 9, 2010 at 6:28 am

another teacher:

that’s why you should “spike your salary” right before retiring like past supe and assist supe did in MVWSD! Roll in everything you can (cost of health insurance, travel expences, ect into your final high three).

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by D. Morton, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Feb 9, 2010 at 2:11 pm

I am a father of a first grade teacher in Butte county and I can tell you it is one of the hardest and mentally demanding jobs one can have. Parents expect the teacher not only to teach their children, but to do the things that they as parents should be doing at home, such as discipline, respect for peers and elders, accountabiliy, etc. Teachers also put in extra hours nightly and on weekends preparing lessons and grading papers, etc. Yet even with this, the rewards of being a teacher are enormous, for they are the teachers and mentors of the next generation.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by Parent at MVHS, a resident of the Waverly Park neighborhood, on Feb 12, 2010 at 5:29 pm

Neighbor asked: “Which is the high school district and which is the elementary school district? (and why are they different?)” School districts in California are not set up like in other places. Where I grew up, each city/town had its own school district; sometimes small towns were combined into one district. Here, the districts were each created separately, at different times over the last century and a half, and the districts overlap. Sometimes you have Unified districts (like Palo Alto, where all the schools in K-12 are one district) but more often you have separate elementary districts and high school districts. For ours, Mountain View Whisman School District(MVWSD) (encompassing most of Mountain View and a handful of Palo Alto addresses) and Los Altos School District (LASD)(encompassing most of Los Altos, part of Mountain View, and a bit of Palo Alto) both feed into the Mountain View Los Altos High School District. Half of the kids in each high school are from MVWSD, half from LASD. Separate district, separate funding, separate administration. This is just “how it is” in California.

Now, about parcel taxes. The High School District has never assesed a parcel tas. Both elementary districts have them, and property owners who live within the respective district’s boundaries pay the parcel tax accordingly, to either LASD or MVWSD. Parcel tax revenues can be used for teacher’s salaries and other programs.

The High School district is placing a BOND measure on the ballot. Bond measures cannot pay for salaries, they pay for facilities improvements. A short way to remember this is Parcel taxes=People, Bonds=Buildings.

From what I can tell, in general teachers’ salaries are commensurate with how much money a school district has. I agree with the earlier poster who demonstrated that the communities with higher-educated parents have higher-paid teachers. More property tax revenue could account for some of this (higher education=higher income=nicer homes and high test scores=higher property values in the district=more property tax revenue), if the districts are basic aid (if you don’t know what “basic aid” is, Google California Education Funding, then prepare to read a lot and still be confused!), but also because parents in those districts are able to support educational foundations and parcel taxes, providing supplemental funding to districts and freeing up funding for salaries.

Mountain View Los Altos High School District is a Basic Aid district, and is relatively well-funded compared to many California School Districts. They are not rolling in dough, and are experiencing cutbacks due to the funding crisis, but to a lesser degree than many other districts. Hence, they have been able to pay their teachers more. I think they are fortunate that they have been able to compensate the teachers so well, at least so far. I will say that I think they have excellent teachers. And, High School Teachers all need specialized teaching credentials rather than general credentials. You do want your Calculus or Physics AP teachers to really know their stuff. So these are people who could probably make more money in industry, but their calling is teaching. I don’t have a problem with how much they are paid. I’m glad we have high caliber instructors preparing our kids for top-notch colleges.

Those who complain that teachers have cushy jobs must not have any friends or family who are teachers. Lots of fun to go on a vacation weekend with one and watch them spend hours correcting homework. Teachers work a lot more hours outside of the school day and calendar.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

Posted by former teacher, a resident of another community, on Nov 11, 2010 at 7:44 am

I have been both a high school teacher and a tech professional.

Which pays more? Tech, by a long shot! Which is more demanding?

Engineering for me requires long hours and often missed vacations, but there was always an ebb and flow to the work, both long term and short term. If I’m not feeling well, or just having a slow morning, it is usually manageable. I spend long hours in the cube, but at least for me, when I go home I leave work at work.

Teaching is brutal in comparison. Teachers are ALWAYS “on”. Not feeling great, or just having a hard time getting going in the morning? Too bad. There are students expecting a creative, energetic, and sharp person to lead their class. And when I went home at the end of the day? Plenty of work came with me. Feeling like you need to miss a day due to illness or family matters? Better think twice, because catching up is really, really tough.

Summer? Nearly every summer I had was spent working an average of 10 to 20 hours a week. I frequently attended week long all day seminars without pay, and was usually overhauling or creating lesson plans throughout. I often was prepping for a new to me course for the next school year. I laughed at the comments containing “3 months off for summer”. It’s not nearly “off”, and mine were much closer to two.

I know there are engineers and other professionals who are “on” throughout the day. I’m just sharing my own experience.

Side thought? Superintendant Groves needs to give more thought to whether his teachers are indeed second to none. Most of them are quite good, but he is still paying top dollar to a significant percentage of clunkers.

Report Objectionable Content

——————————————————————————–

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit “submit” and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any “member” name you wish.

Name: *

Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Neighborhoods – Blossom Valley – Castro City – Cuernavaca – Cuesta Park – Gemello – Jackson Park – Martens-Carmelita – Monta Loma – North Whisman – Old Mountain View – Rex Manor – Shoreline West – St. Francis Acres – Stierlin Estates – Sylvan Park – The Crossings – Waverly Park – Whisman Station – Willowgate School communities Other – another community
Comment: *

Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:

——————————————————————————–

©2011 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.

Share

CA Gov. Brown, school administrators & teacher unions rig the system to help the adults who run it rather than the children to be educated. Who will speak up for the children & parents in Compton, California?

Teachers, unions for teachers, administrators and CA Gov. Brown seek to crush the “parent trigger” law in CA which allows parents in failing schools to replace administrators and bring in charter schools.

Share

Some schools do a terrible job of educating their children. In failing schools in California parents of children in failing schools could exercise “parent trigger”. Parent trigger allowed parents to replace the public school system with a charter school.

Now the powers that protect the adults that run the public schools seek to crush parent trigger.

“Parent trigger” school reform was undermined by Governor Jerry Brown on his first day of office, He replaced seven reform members of the state board of education with UNION ALLIES including a lobbyist for the California Teachers Association. The new board plans to re-write the rules that govern the parent trigger law.

Assemblywoman Julia Brownley and state schools chief Tom Torlakson, both voted against parent trigger last year, plan to amend the law. Expect them to work for appeal of the parent trigger law.

When parents in Compton, CA exercised the parent trigger law the teachers urged parents to rescind their petitions Then, when that did not work, the district required parents to bring official photo identification knowing that some are illegal immigrants. A judge issued a temporary restraining order stopping the verification plan. In response the school administrations declared all petitions disqualified based on technicalities — some petitions were not stapled and some legal code numbers were mistyped.

Think Obama might speak up for the children in Compton, CA? Doubtful. Remember what happened to the charter schools in Washington D.C. — that Obama refused funding to continue even though they were successful? There’s a case where a black President does not step up to continue a success story for poor, black urban students. Why might that be? Obama supports the teacher unions because he and the Democrat Party get money from their dues. Money which pays for his re-election.

The struggle by the public sector unions in Wisconsin part and parcel to what the public schools and unions are doing in California. The public sector unions want to keep control.

What can the public do? Connect with organizations that work for responsible change. For example, one organization to join is Ask Heritage. Join and work for responsible government.

Go to www.askheritage.org and take their latest quiz. It is fun and you will learn important information. For example, did you know that 1 in 5 persons in the U.S. is entirely dependent on the rest of us? Our system is creating dependency and that is not healthy.

Share