Aptos, CA psychologist: Fraud against Gulf fishermen by one of their own?

Did a Vietnamese-American Texas attorney commit fraud when she signed up 1,000 Vietnamese fishermen in return for 60% contingency fees? Smells like fraud.

Roughly half of the 40,000 fishermen in the Gulf are Vietnamese refugees. Recently, one Vietnamese-American female attorney from a Texas law firm signed up over 1,000 of the refugees in exchange for 60% contingency fees. What explanation of the intricacies of the American legal system was individually given by that attorney to those 1,000 persons? What do you think that Vietnamese female attorney said? Probably something like, get a little now rather than wait a long time like in the Valdez spill?

“Before it became the single biggest environmental catastrophe in American history, BP’s Deepwater Horizon was a magnet for barracudas, which endlessly circled the oil rig in the Gulf’s warm waters, feeding on smaller fish. The oil plume and massive cleanup have driven away many of the underwater predators. But as a group of Vietnamese-American lawyers discovered before returning to the Bay Area from the Gulf of Mexico last week, the barracudas have come ashore.

“And they were carrying briefcases.

“About half the Gulf’s fishermen are Vietnamese-Americans — as many as 20,000 in all — and many of them have signed retainer agreements with attorneys who promised to help sort out BP’s complicated claims process, and represent them in any eventual lawsuits against the oil company. But because there is almost no cadre of Vietnamese-speaking professionals in southern Louisiana or Mississippi, the fishermen were easy prey for lawyers who see BP’s $20 billion escrow fund as a cash cow.

“Idled for months, the fishermen were unsure which way to turn. Those who agreed to sign waivers in exchange for compensation now would forfeit their right to sue BP. But lawsuits filed after the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska took decades to unwind, and in many cases resulted in relatively small payments. Without legal advocates, they had no way of knowing whether BP’s Vessels of Opportunity program — putting fishermen to work on the cleanup — was being implemented fairly.

Summoned to the Gulf Coast by the Mississippi Center for Justice to provide free legal counsel to Vietnamese fishing families, half a dozen members of the nonprofit Vietnamese American Bar Association of Northern California arrived in New Orleans expecting to be greeted warmly. But other attorneys — armed with contracts calling for contingency fees as high as 60 percent — had beaten them there, and left behind an almost impenetrable slick of hard feelings.

Lots of fear

When the pro bono lawyers conducted a town-hall meeting at the Mary Queen of Vietnam Catholic Church in New Orleans’ Ninth Ward, few fishermen showed up, and most of those that came sat in the back with their arms folded, just staring.

“We figured because we look like them and talk like them, they would accept the services we had to offer,” said Mai Phan, a San Jose immigration lawyer who grew up in New Orleans. “But when we got there, it was the complete opposite of what we expected. They were afraid of us.”

Afraid, and angry. “I’ve never seen a group have such a look of hatred in their eyes for attorneys,” said Ann Nguyen, an Oakland-based bankruptcy lawyer, who is VABANC’s vice president.

Two months into the mammoth spill, fishermen along the Gulf Coast have already missed one of the most promising shrimping seasons in years, and estimates of how long it could take for them to get their lines and nets back into the water range from two to five years. The Exxon Valdez oil spill left Alaska’s fishermen tied up in court for three decades.

The Gulf Coast is home to the largest Vietnamese-American population outside California, and yet, the lawyers who went from here to there discovered the two communities have little in common. Some were surprised by how little the fishermen had assimilated into American life. “They’re very different from the Vietnamese in our area,” Phan said. “Since they came to this country, all they knew is how to fish.”

“These people came from Vietnam as refugees, went straight there, and they’ve been stuck there in kind of a time warp,” said Nguyen. “There’s a huge lack of Vietnamese professionals down there.”

The entire fishing industry is imperiled, but immigrant fishermen — who essentially transplanted their way of life from Vietnam to the Gulf Coast — could be in double trouble. If their livelihood disappears, they could become refugees again, this time fleeing economic hardship rather than war.

Nguyen’s father was a fisherman on the Gulf when she was growing up, and Phan’s parents lost their home during Hurricane Katrina. “This is really emotional,” Phan said. “It’s only been five years since Katrina, and they were barely rebuilding their lives when this hit. Fishing was all these people knew, and now they’re really struggling.”

As the Bay Area lawyers’ three days in the Gulf went on, word began to spread that they weren’t trying to profit at the locals’ expense, and the number of fishermen seeking their help increased. When they returned home last Monday, both Nguyen and Phan said they cried — partly because of all the work left undone.

They’re working with the White House and Rep. Anh Cao, R-La., on a white paper covering many of the legal issues they encountered there. Phan said they are also raising funds to create a fellowship for a Vietnamese-language attorney or law student to work with the Gulf fishermen full time.

Shortly before she returned to San Jose, Phan encountered one of the attorneys whose name she had seen on many of the contracts requiring huge contingency fees. She represented a firm from Texas, and she was Vietnamese-American.

Basically, the Texas lawyer told Phan, “If you’re here to get clients, it’s too late. I’ve already retained over a thousand of them here. You’re on my turf.'”

When one of the pro bono lawyers told her she must have an enormous staff to zealously represent so many of her own people, the barracuda silently swam away.Contact Bruce Newman at 408-920-5004.

Share

How stop gang violence? Public commitment by families and swoop up the guns! And sports….

What can get a handle on gang violence? Healthy, supervised activities is one avenue. Other avenues include individual commitments by the youth and parents made publicly and supported by the institutions that they respect — school, church, neighbors.

Churches, for example, have Graduation Recognition ceremonies. How about Initiation for Peaceful Solutions Ceremonies for youth starting by age 9 that are renewed once a year? And to bolster that public commitment by youth and parents blessed by priests and ministers create safe communities that are gun/knife/weapon free. Encourage parents to create ways to swoop up the guns and weapons that are on the streets and in the hands of children. And yes — structured activities such as soccer that encourage cooperation and healthy competition will enhance self esteem.

Below is how Live Oak, California is addressing the problem of gang violence. It is a start!!

A Volunteer Opportunity
A FREE 6 week indoor Soccer Program for youth ages 6 – 17 is being offered on Monday and Wednesday evenings from 6:00 – 9:00pm June 14th – July 21st. at Shoreline School in Live Oak. It is offered through a partnership between the Sheriff’s Activity League, the Live Oak Family Resource Center, Communities Organized for Relational Power in Action (COPA) and the Live Oak School District. VOLUNTEERS (adults and older teens) ARE NEEDED – coaches, refs, line refs, security, “team parent” etc. There will be a volunteer training on June 7th 6-8 pm. For more information call 476-7284 x 104.
Pre registration for players is June 3rd. Priority to youth living in the Live Oak School District but all kids accepted on a space available basis. Call same # to find out how to register There are many kids living in our community who cannot play soccer because their families cannot afford it. This program promotes self-esteem, teamwork and leadership skills while offering healthy activities in a safe space.

Share

immigration reform possible? Yes!

How to solve illegal immigration?

Work to change the conditions that draw people here illegally. Too easily people can get fake identification papers. The Border Patrol too frequently turns a blind eye to people entering illegally. There is no fence along the southern border — though money was allocated for one. The federal government for too many years has done too little.

Hence Arizona’s sensible response. More needs to be done, however.

So let’s make sensible changes:

** Built rapport with law abiding groups across the Border. Have a foreign workers program and all workers carry tamper proof identification cards. Make a fence that is not easily penetrated and well maintained. Provide foreign aid to families and children that encourages families to stay and or return to Mexico and other Latin American countries.

** Built a solid fence with a 1/2 mile “no go” strip maintained by air planes, the national guard & border patrol. Physically fit persons paid by the government — like census workers — can walk the fence and be the eyes and ears for the national guard and border patrol. Use air planes equipped with laser tag guns, glow in the dark paint ball guns and other means of identifying persons that have illegally entered the U.S.

** Akin to the “go to the people & get their support” in Iraq and Afghanistan, use our military to “make friends” with law abiding citizens and groups in Mexico. What do they need/ want so their young people stay in Mexico and contribute to Mexico’s development? Give direct aid in small towns so they thrive and are pro-American and give us tips as to what the drug cartels are doing. Build rapport and support for law abiding behavior across the border.

** Remember that it is illegal behavior. Follow the laws that are already on the books.

** People are drawn here because of the freedoms we have as a lawful society. That’s what is wrong with amnesty every 10-15 years. Amnesty is a reward for bad behavior. Let’s reward legal behavior.

Share

are we safer now that Obama is President? The jihadists do feel safer!!

Let’s see. The Christmas Day bomber. He got Miranda rights. And the Times Square fellow who almost blew up the Square. He initially got Miranda rights. With a hem and a haw. And the Ford Hood psychiatrist that shot a bunch of fellow soldiers. As he was in the military I suppose he will — if able to stand trail – get a military trial. And there was a student who shot a couple of recruiters. Who else have I left out? All this in President Obama’s first year.

Do I feel safer now that Obama is President? Do you feel safer? Who should feel safer? Jihadists probably do feel safer!! With Miranda rights given to persons who commit domestic terrorism it will be many a year before their legal rights are exhausted.

Share

Aptos, CA psychologist: Boxer and Carly both full of hot air?

Choices for California: more of Boxer or…. ex-CEO Fiorina, Tom Campbell or Devore. Tom Cambell is a tax raiser. Fiorina failed as CEO. What about the other one?

Taxes are not the problem. We have to stop the politicians from spending.

See the following video. A bit heavy. I don’t care that Boxer only passed 3 bills in all those years. I do care that Boxer is a statist — always votes for more control for the government. She comes across as always right, haughty and not that smart. Her global warming ideas seem full of hot air.

So, if not Boxer — then who?