Aptos, CA psychologist: Fraud against Gulf fishermen by one of their own?

Did a Vietnamese-American Texas attorney commit fraud when she signed up 1,000 Vietnamese fishermen in return for 60% contingency fees? Smells like fraud.

Roughly half of the 40,000 fishermen in the Gulf are Vietnamese refugees. Recently, one Vietnamese-American female attorney from a Texas law firm signed up over 1,000 of the refugees in exchange for 60% contingency fees. What explanation of the intricacies of the American legal system was individually given by that attorney to those 1,000 persons? What do you think that Vietnamese female attorney said? Probably something like, get a little now rather than wait a long time like in the Valdez spill?

“Before it became the single biggest environmental catastrophe in American history, BP’s Deepwater Horizon was a magnet for barracudas, which endlessly circled the oil rig in the Gulf’s warm waters, feeding on smaller fish. The oil plume and massive cleanup have driven away many of the underwater predators. But as a group of Vietnamese-American lawyers discovered before returning to the Bay Area from the Gulf of Mexico last week, the barracudas have come ashore.

“And they were carrying briefcases.

“About half the Gulf’s fishermen are Vietnamese-Americans — as many as 20,000 in all — and many of them have signed retainer agreements with attorneys who promised to help sort out BP’s complicated claims process, and represent them in any eventual lawsuits against the oil company. But because there is almost no cadre of Vietnamese-speaking professionals in southern Louisiana or Mississippi, the fishermen were easy prey for lawyers who see BP’s $20 billion escrow fund as a cash cow.

“Idled for months, the fishermen were unsure which way to turn. Those who agreed to sign waivers in exchange for compensation now would forfeit their right to sue BP. But lawsuits filed after the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska took decades to unwind, and in many cases resulted in relatively small payments. Without legal advocates, they had no way of knowing whether BP’s Vessels of Opportunity program — putting fishermen to work on the cleanup — was being implemented fairly.

Summoned to the Gulf Coast by the Mississippi Center for Justice to provide free legal counsel to Vietnamese fishing families, half a dozen members of the nonprofit Vietnamese American Bar Association of Northern California arrived in New Orleans expecting to be greeted warmly. But other attorneys — armed with contracts calling for contingency fees as high as 60 percent — had beaten them there, and left behind an almost impenetrable slick of hard feelings.

Lots of fear

When the pro bono lawyers conducted a town-hall meeting at the Mary Queen of Vietnam Catholic Church in New Orleans’ Ninth Ward, few fishermen showed up, and most of those that came sat in the back with their arms folded, just staring.

“We figured because we look like them and talk like them, they would accept the services we had to offer,” said Mai Phan, a San Jose immigration lawyer who grew up in New Orleans. “But when we got there, it was the complete opposite of what we expected. They were afraid of us.”

Afraid, and angry. “I’ve never seen a group have such a look of hatred in their eyes for attorneys,” said Ann Nguyen, an Oakland-based bankruptcy lawyer, who is VABANC’s vice president.

Two months into the mammoth spill, fishermen along the Gulf Coast have already missed one of the most promising shrimping seasons in years, and estimates of how long it could take for them to get their lines and nets back into the water range from two to five years. The Exxon Valdez oil spill left Alaska’s fishermen tied up in court for three decades.

The Gulf Coast is home to the largest Vietnamese-American population outside California, and yet, the lawyers who went from here to there discovered the two communities have little in common. Some were surprised by how little the fishermen had assimilated into American life. “They’re very different from the Vietnamese in our area,” Phan said. “Since they came to this country, all they knew is how to fish.”

“These people came from Vietnam as refugees, went straight there, and they’ve been stuck there in kind of a time warp,” said Nguyen. “There’s a huge lack of Vietnamese professionals down there.”

The entire fishing industry is imperiled, but immigrant fishermen — who essentially transplanted their way of life from Vietnam to the Gulf Coast — could be in double trouble. If their livelihood disappears, they could become refugees again, this time fleeing economic hardship rather than war.

Nguyen’s father was a fisherman on the Gulf when she was growing up, and Phan’s parents lost their home during Hurricane Katrina. “This is really emotional,” Phan said. “It’s only been five years since Katrina, and they were barely rebuilding their lives when this hit. Fishing was all these people knew, and now they’re really struggling.”

As the Bay Area lawyers’ three days in the Gulf went on, word began to spread that they weren’t trying to profit at the locals’ expense, and the number of fishermen seeking their help increased. When they returned home last Monday, both Nguyen and Phan said they cried — partly because of all the work left undone.

They’re working with the White House and Rep. Anh Cao, R-La., on a white paper covering many of the legal issues they encountered there. Phan said they are also raising funds to create a fellowship for a Vietnamese-language attorney or law student to work with the Gulf fishermen full time.

Shortly before she returned to San Jose, Phan encountered one of the attorneys whose name she had seen on many of the contracts requiring huge contingency fees. She represented a firm from Texas, and she was Vietnamese-American.

Basically, the Texas lawyer told Phan, “If you’re here to get clients, it’s too late. I’ve already retained over a thousand of them here. You’re on my turf.'”

When one of the pro bono lawyers told her she must have an enormous staff to zealously represent so many of her own people, the barracuda silently swam away.Contact Bruce Newman at 408-920-5004.

Share

immigration reform possible? Yes!

How to solve illegal immigration?

Work to change the conditions that draw people here illegally. Too easily people can get fake identification papers. The Border Patrol too frequently turns a blind eye to people entering illegally. There is no fence along the southern border — though money was allocated for one. The federal government for too many years has done too little.

Hence Arizona’s sensible response. More needs to be done, however.

So let’s make sensible changes:

** Built rapport with law abiding groups across the Border. Have a foreign workers program and all workers carry tamper proof identification cards. Make a fence that is not easily penetrated and well maintained. Provide foreign aid to families and children that encourages families to stay and or return to Mexico and other Latin American countries.

** Built a solid fence with a 1/2 mile “no go” strip maintained by air planes, the national guard & border patrol. Physically fit persons paid by the government — like census workers — can walk the fence and be the eyes and ears for the national guard and border patrol. Use air planes equipped with laser tag guns, glow in the dark paint ball guns and other means of identifying persons that have illegally entered the U.S.

** Akin to the “go to the people & get their support” in Iraq and Afghanistan, use our military to “make friends” with law abiding citizens and groups in Mexico. What do they need/ want so their young people stay in Mexico and contribute to Mexico’s development? Give direct aid in small towns so they thrive and are pro-American and give us tips as to what the drug cartels are doing. Build rapport and support for law abiding behavior across the border.

** Remember that it is illegal behavior. Follow the laws that are already on the books.

** People are drawn here because of the freedoms we have as a lawful society. That’s what is wrong with amnesty every 10-15 years. Amnesty is a reward for bad behavior. Let’s reward legal behavior.

Share

are we safer now that Obama is President? The jihadists do feel safer!!

Let’s see. The Christmas Day bomber. He got Miranda rights. And the Times Square fellow who almost blew up the Square. He initially got Miranda rights. With a hem and a haw. And the Ford Hood psychiatrist that shot a bunch of fellow soldiers. As he was in the military I suppose he will — if able to stand trail – get a military trial. And there was a student who shot a couple of recruiters. Who else have I left out? All this in President Obama’s first year.

Do I feel safer now that Obama is President? Do you feel safer? Who should feel safer? Jihadists probably do feel safer!! With Miranda rights given to persons who commit domestic terrorism it will be many a year before their legal rights are exhausted.

Share

Would you take a $100 if someone picked it up off ground and asked if it was yours?

Would you take money?If you see someone walking towards you on the street holding out a $100 bill and asking if you want it, most people will avoid the person, say something like “I don’t come that cheap!” or “No, I do not have change…” We all know those people are wacky.

But if in any kind of minimum relationship and someone bends over and picks up a $100 bill and asks if it is yours…. what do YOU do? Do you take it? Then you can be bribed.

The article below is why to buy IMPORTED tomatoes and not buy from Safeway. And it is about BRIBES and TAINTED tomatoes. Continue reading “Would you take a $100 if someone picked it up off ground and asked if it was yours?”

Share

Napa Hospital Chief Arrested for Alleged Sexual Assault of a Foster Son 10 Years Ago

Head shrink at Napa State Hospital arrested for alleged molestation that occurred 10 years ago.

Share

Foulk, Chief of Napa State Hospital, charged with molest

Certainly a young man of 20 can remember what happened 10 years ago. But, why wait until someone who harmed you is in charge of a hospital to come forward? One does not have to be in charge of the joint to continue to do bad things.

Do you think Foulk has the “look” of a molester? Someone who works at the Santa Cruz County jail told me that she thought Foulk “looks” like a molester. I disagree. There is no “look”… Continue reading “Napa Hospital Chief Arrested for Alleged Sexual Assault of a Foster Son 10 Years Ago”

Share

Aptos psychologist: your cell phone location SHOULD be private. Not so says Obama govt.

Cell phone location is a privacy issue.

Share

cellphone privacy?
My cellphone lives in my purse, travels with me in my car, goes to work. Where my cellphone is is a private matter. The government has no business tracking cellphones. The Obama government disagrees. Americans have no expectation of privacy regarding their cell phone? Continue reading “Aptos psychologist: your cell phone location SHOULD be private. Not so says Obama govt.”

Share

Aptos psychologist: Let’s use the Internet to debate and control earmaks

ear marks
Pork is pork. Show it for what it is. Debate it. The Appropriations Committee is the Senate’s “favor factory”. It parcels out earmarks. Scott Brown wants to be on the Appropriations Committee precisely to improve transparency about earmarks. The last committee meeting held on Transparency in Government was held behind closed doors. written by Cameron Jackson DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share

Americans with Disabilities Act CAN protect persons with Autistic Spectrum Disorders

New Jersey has laws that require physicians to register those they diagnose with autism. Why such a high rate in the state of New Jersey? When there are dramatically different rates then the enviornment has to be implicated in addition to genetics. See the following article:

” A FLURRY of legislation was signed during former Gov. Jon Corzine’s last days in office, including two important autism bills: anti-discrimination legislation for people with autism and the opening of the autism registry to adults.

New Jersey has the highest autism rate in the country — 1 in 94
— and in the past three years, six other laws relating to autism were enacted. One, requiring that state-regulated health insurers cover medically necessary treatments, starts on Feb. 10.

Eight laws in three years is commendable. We urge the new governor and reorganized Legislature to continue that important work.

Autism is not one but a range of developmental disorders that are usually diagnosed around age 3. The cause is not fully understood, although scientists think complex genetic factors play a key role, as well as environmental factors. The disorder can range from mild to severe and from one symptom to many.

The autism registry started in 2007 and requires doctors who diagnose a child with autism to report it. Expanding the autism registry to include adults, who will voluntarily report themselves, will help the state develop better adult programs and provide a clearer picture of the range and scope of the disorder.

Advocates say the federal Americans with Disabilities Act has weakened over the last decade, and people with autism have not always been thoroughly protected. The new legislation expands the state’s anti-discrimination law to specifically include people with autism spectrum disorders. That means, for example, people with autism cannot be turned away from movie theaters or swimming pools.

Families of children with autism go through difficult years of grappling with the diagnosis, understanding their children’s needs and putting together the best education plan for them. It is an expensive, lonely and uncertain period for parents, especially since they’re dealing with a disorder we don’t fully understand. Then there’s the future. Parents worry about their kids growing up and government-mandated help running out.

Assemblywoman Joan Voss, D-Fort Lee, and Assemblyman Gary Schaer, D-Passaic, reintroduced a bill this month to create a state autism Web site. It would include information about the disorder and how to contact the Early Intervention Program. It’s a good start.

Share

How create competition in health care? free enterprise not government run health care

Paul Krugman in Baucus and the threshold (Santa Cruz Sentinel 9-20-09) writes that the Baucus plan doesn’t create “real competition in the insurance market. The right way to create competition is to offer a public option, a government run insurance plan individuals can buy into as an alternative to private insurance…”

That boggles the mind. Paul, we already have a public option — it is called Medicare. Everyone age 65 is forced to use the public option plan. Whether they like it or not. Medicare is a single payer, government run plan. And it runs hugely in the red. Reform Medicare instead of creating another government run bureaucracy.

How reform health care? Here’s how:

One, let the over 65 population opt out of Medicare in favor of privately run insurance plans of their choice. Create an Exchange that allows private insurance plans to compete with Medicare Over 65 people who are healthy and only want catastrophic care can get what they want. People over 65 may not want to and should not have to to pay for cosmetic surgery, abortions or AIDS care. Let the over 65 choose the level and kind of care they want. This is a way to create real competition with the existing single payer system – Medicare.What was that cry in the wilderness — Let my people go! Today let the people go out of Medicare if they choose.

Two, get serious about tort reform. Cap the amount of money people can get for non-economic losses at $400,000. Get rid of joint and several liability. That is serious tort reform. One state has already made these reforms. Make tort reform applicable in all states.

Use the carrot instead of a stick.
Give incentives for people to either buy health care or set aside money in an account to pay for their cost. Don’t use penalties for not buying insurance

.

Share