State Dept  Kerry/ Clinton awards $9 MILLION — without competition  — to John Kerry’s daughter for her pet project.
More than $9 million of Department of State money has been funneled through the Peace Corps to a nonprofit foundation started and run by Secretary of State John Kerry’s daughter, documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation show.
The Department of State funded a Peace Corps program created by Dr. Vanessa Kerry and officials from both agencies, records show. The Peace Corps then awarded the money without competition to a nonprofit Kerry created for the program.
Initially, the Peace Corps awarded Kerry’s group — now called Seed Global Health — with a three-year contract worth $2 million of State Department money on Sept. 10, 2012, documents show. Her father was then the chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, which oversees both the Department of State and the Peace Corps.
Seed secured a four-year extension in September 2015, again without competition. This time, the Peace Corps gave the nonprofit $6.4 million provided by the Department of State while John Kerry was secretary of state.
___________________________
Firenze Sage: Â You have got to love “olde raise taxes Kerry” Â — who avoids taxes by berthing his yacht in a foreign state and gives our money to his kid.
CIA Director John Brennan voted for the Communist Party candidate in the 1976 presidential election. Only now he tells us.
In 1976 the  Democrat and Republican candidates were Ford versus Carter.  Carter won.
Brennan told a congressional panel last week that he “froze†while taking a CIA polygraph test four years later when the questioner asked him if he had ever worked with or for a group that was “dedicated to overthrowing the U.S.,†CNN reported.
“This was back in 1980, and I thought back to a previous election where I voted, and I voted for the Communist Party candidate,†Brennan said at a panel discussion regarding diversity in the intelligence community during the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s annual conference.
Hillary the parrot?  A totally scripted performance:  Hilary got  the questions one week  prior to her  interview with talk show host Steve  Harvey.
Talk show host Steve Harvey provided Hillary Clinton’s campaign with the exact questions he would ask of Clinton during a February interview.  That’s according to an internal campaign memo sent a week before the interview and obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
“Steve is known to be a host who goes out of his way to make his guests feel comfortable,†two of Clinton’s top communications aides wrote in a memo to Clinton a week ahead of her interview. “We coordinated closely with the show’s producers on the script and format of the show.â€
The memo, sent to Clinton on Feb. 17, 2016, by campaign spokeswoman Karen Finney and communications aide Betsaida Alcantara, was attached to an email posted on the website DCLeaks.com by hackers suspected of acting in concert with the Russian government.
One of the individuals behind the website provided the Free Beacon with a password to access that email and others sent to and from Clinton volunteer Beanca Nicholson, who was doing advance work for a campaign swing through Chicago that included the Harvey interview.
The campaign memo reveals that Clinton’s staff worked with Harvey to craft the structure of the interview, and briefed the Democratic presidential nominee ahead of time on the precise wording of Harvey’s questions.
Muslim men stone to death  women who sleep around.  Hilary  “stoned to death”  the reputations of  women who  spoke up saying  that  Hilary’s husband  Bill Clinton  sexually assaulted or raped them.
These women’s  reputations were harmed or destroyed.   Hilary was in charge.  Check the record.
The  women who spoke up included:    Jennifer Flowers.  Juanita Broadwich and Kathleen Wiley. There were others.
 Hillary smears Gennifer Flowers; calls her “trailer-trash.â€
 Hillary slams former White House intern Monica Lewinsky as a “narcissistic loony toon†after she had consensual relations with her husband in the Oval Office.
CBS News reports: “According to the friend, Diane Blair — a political science professor whose papers were donated to the University of Arkansas Special Collections library – Hillary Clinton credited Bill Clinton with trying to break away from Lewinsky, whom she called a ‘narcissistic loony toon.'”
 Hillary, defending an alleged rapist, smears his 12-year-old alleged rape victim, claiming the young girl had a “tendency to seek out older men.” She also laughs on tape over the cunning way she had vital evidence dismissed, destroying the alleged rape victim’s case.Â
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,†Hillary wrote in the affidavit about the 12-year-old girl.
Hillary is even captured on tape laughing at the fact that she got the only piece of evidence against her client dismissed: “He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,†Hillary says, audibly laughing.
The alleged rape victim told The Daily Beast what she would say to Hillary if she ever has the chance: “‘You took a case of mine in ’75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.'”
Hillary disparagingly refers to the numerous women her husband was involved with as “bimbos.”
In 1991, Mrs. Clinton called the onslaught of women accusing her husband of sexual misconduct or consensual infidelity as the “bimbo eruption.â€
On Hilary’s website  and  later  removed:   “I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault:  Don’t let anyone silence your voice.  You have the right to be heard”  Hillary, September 14, 2015
Oh? Â So now Hilary says women have the right to be heard?
Tell  Hilary:  You harmed women — “stoned to death”  their reputations. And now you tell young women to ‘speak up’?
Why  illegally publish Trump’s tax returns from 1995?
The New York Times executive editor said during a visit to Harvard in September that he would risk jail to publish Donald Trump’s tax returns. He made good on his word Saturday night when the Times published Trump tax documents from 1995, which show the Republican presidential nominee claimed losses of $916 million that year — enough to avoid paying federal income taxes for as many as 18 years.
Federal law makes it illegal to publish an unauthorized tax return or “return information”:
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.
Back in 1995, New  York Times called Trump a genius.   Had they called  his loans and the banks would  have gone down too.
About news of Trump tax return stuff…
You have to be a calculating person to be a politician. Â Including disclosure of financial disclosure forms.
Trump — an outsider — is not and has never been a politician.
Any tax return that utilizes laws looks different.  A  22 year  old tax return by a private citizen … Trump….is being used to attempt to damage him.
Trump’s support is precisely that he is an outsider.
Holt: Stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York…
Trump: No, you’re wrong. It went before a judge, who was a very against-police judge. It was taken away from her and our mayor, our new mayor, refused to go forward with the case.
Fact Wreck rating: Trump is 100% right, according to the New York Times and Holt’s collusion with Clinton is becoming hard to ignore.
Who is racist? More than half of Trump’s supporters  – the  ‘deplorables’  – are racist says Dana Milbank. Â
Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank doubles down on Hillary Clinton’s assertion about the “deplorables”.  In Milbank’s words, more than “half†of Donald Trump’s supporters are an “irredeemable†“basket of deplorables†who are, in her words, “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic.† Â
Milbank writes that that far from being incorrect in her denunciation, Clinton may in fact have “low-balled the number†by claiming only “half†are racist.
Hillary Clinton may have been unwise to say half of Donald Trump’s supporters are racists and other “deplorables.†But she wasn’t wrong. If anything, when it comes to Trump’s racist support, she might have low-balled the number says Milbank.
Concerning the Clinton Foundation: Â In 2014 Â $5 million goes for “charitable grants” and $85 million for salaries and travel.
What does this suggest?
The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.
That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.
Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,†while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.â€
Sad to hear. More coverup? Â What’s going on? Â Hilary “could barely climb the podium steps” says Democratic senator Sheldon Whitehouse. Â This comes out of the leaked Colin Powell emails.
“Sheldon Whitehouse, who is a huge Clinton supporter, said they were both giving speeches at the same event a few months back and she could barely climb the podium steps,†Democratic financier Jeffery Leeds said in an email discussion with George W. Bush’s former secretary of state.
It’s not ok to steal from anyone – and especially bad form to steal  from your poorest supporters.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters.  Her campaign  purposefully and repeatedly overcharges  them after they make what’s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website.  Multiple sources have said so to the  Observer. See photo on the left.
The overcharges are occurring quite frequently.  They occur  so often that the fraud department at one of the nation’s biggest banks receives up to 100 phone calls a day from Clinton’s small donors asking for refunds for unauthorized charges to their bankcards made by Clinton’s campaign.
One elderly Clinton donor, who has been a victim of this fraud scheme, has filed a complaint with her state’s attorney general and a representative from the office told her that they had forwarded her case to the Federal Election Commission.
“We get up to a hundred calls a day from Hillary’s low-income supporters complaining about multiple unauthorized charges,†a source, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of job security, from the Wells Fargo fraud department told the Observer.
The source claims that the Clinton campaign has been pulling this stunt since Spring of this year. The Hillary for America campaign will overcharge small donors by repeatedly charging small amounts such as $20 to the bankcards of donors who made a one-time donation. The Clinton campaign strategically doesn’t overcharge these donors $100 or more because the bank would then be obligated to investigate the fraud.