Aptos, CA psychologist: Syria’s Assad is not a “reformer” as Clinton & Obama claim. Hear Dr. Jasser’s comments….

Syrian leader a "reformer" as Clinton claims?

Do you remember Hillary Clinton saying that the leader of Syria is a “reformer”. And that has been Presdient Obama’s position.

Forty years of repression say differently. Here’s comments from Dr. Jasser whose grandfather was a newspaperman in Syria. Dr. Jasser recommends a careful investigation of Dr. Chahabi…

May 28, 2011
words of Dr. Jasser:
“As we in the free-world have stood by and watched, 2011 has marked the awakening of the principles of freedom within the hearts of Arab people throughout the Middle East. Syria, which has long stood at the crossroads of the Middle East, today remains as one of the last functioning bastions of the secular fascist regimes.

This is no surprise to the millions of Syrians around the world most of whom escaped the slavery of the Assad regime. The Assads have held power through the outright brutalization of the Syrian people which has created a global Syrian culture of fear.

The pathologies within Syria after nearly a half a century of rule by one of the worst fascist regimes in humanity are multi-dimensional.

There are more Syrians living outside Syria than inside because so many have fled the brutality of the regime. And even though many of them now live in freedom after leaving their motherland, their behavior remains largely muted by the long tentacles of the Syrian government.

Any public comments or activities against the domestic and foreign interests of the Assad regime by any Syrians around the world may place close or even distant family members in harm’s way for reprisals including imprisonment and torture simply as a result of a vocal family member in the U.S. or outside of Syria.

Regimes like Assad’s know full well the impact which any global effort to isolate his government can have upon his longevity.

It is well known within the Syrian-expatriate network that the Assad regime has countless global sympathizers and agents who either directly or indirectly provide information to Damascus on any and all activities of Syrians who live abroad.

In exchange for this information they may get a number of benefits from simply being told that their families will be “left alone” to actually receiving financial benefits from the Syrian security apparatus. At times this information will lead to the detainment and torture of other Syrians domestically in order to obtain more information about anti-regime activities.

Information they obtain is used to create psychological countermeasures both in Syria and outside in order to prevent any type of movement against the interests of the Assad regime.

One cannot overstate the depth of coercion these influence operations have utilized for over 40 years to frighten Syrians around the world into submission even within the United States.The reality is that the “perception and implication of fear and intimidation” for those that escaped Syria can be overwhelming and paralyzing to all free speech.

In fact in my own reform work, while I have never even been to Syria because of my own family history, that fear was conveyed to me as a grim reality of having family within Syria’s walls.

So I remained relatively silent. As an American to this day I still cannot fathom that fear, but I realize it exists.

Incidentally, my grandfather, Zuhdi Jasser, was an ardent democracy activist who often lived in and out of house arrest writing newspaper columns under a pseudonym “Al-Karim” against many of the coups and military regimes in Syria in the 50’s and 60’s as the Baathists consolidated power in 1963 and then Hafez Assad came into power by 1970.

Assad’s iron fist was not to be messed with and eventually the people of Syria became quite passive, fearful, and inhumanly submissive to the regime.

Repeatedly, Assad’s henchmen would make public examples of anyone who spoke out against the regime including the massacre in Hama in 1982 that murdered over 40,000 Syrians including women and children in just a few weeks. Hama became the standard by which Syrians measured the lengths to which their oppressors would go to silence them. Today, the people of Dara’a, Banyas and other towns are feeling “Hama Rules” as Tom Friedman described them, but will not leave the streets because they know the fate that awaits them if they do.

With the recent uprisings, the chatter about the activities of the ‘Syrian intelligence network’ (mukhabarat) has risen to a level I have never personally seen or experienced. Yet, the courage exemplified by the freedom activists on the streets of Syria has certainly spilled over to all those Syrian Americans with a conscience in the United States seeking to help them and get their plight heard. Silence seems to no longer be an option for many Syrian Americans.
Demanding accountability from leading Syrian Americans: the Chahabi case study
There is an evolving controversy in Los Angeles that is a microcosm of the national and global battle against Assad’s regime and highlights the fault lines between Americans who stand for freedom and righteousness and those who facilitate Assad’s pariah state. The history, background, profile, and influence activities of Hazem Chahabi, M.D. a nuclear medicine specialist in Newport Beach, CA who owns and operates Newport Diagnostic Center while also serving as an honorary Consul General for the Syrian government in L.A. can serve as a case study.
Our domestic approach to Americans who are Assad sympathizers needs to become transparent. It is time for Syrian agents on American soil to finally feel the long overdue moral and public outrage they deserve for supporting one of humanity’s worst regimes. Imagine Hitler’s inner circle coming to the United States either while the Nazis were still in power or even afterwards and using the booty from the Third Reich to promote influence operations in the United States without public critique? It is time to finally breach the public fault lines against sympathizers of the Assad regime and begin to counter the influence operations for which Assad’s agents on American soil like Chahabi have been at the center.
In mid-March, Syrian Americans of conscience staged a rally outside the Consulate General of the Syrian government in Newport Beach, California (Chahabi’s office) against the Assad regime and for better U.S. support of the uprisings. The protesters appropriately chanted, “Say no more fear! Syria will be free!” Ammar Kahf of the Syria Emergency Task Force of Greater Los Angeles, the organizer of the demonstration stated, “on March 15, Syrians protested 48 years of one-party rule, state of emergency and continued repression.” They held another rally on April 17th in Los Angeles, however this time they were met bizarrely and brazenly with an opposing rally by overtsympathizers of the Assad fascist regime. These Assad sympathizers who staged this rally of sympathy for Assad’s evil, had the temerity to give young Syrian American children signs that said such detestable lies as, “Assad is Peace”. How typical though for Baathists to use children to do their dirty work. Stolen right from the pages of the Soviet counterinsurgency manuals from which their masters have learned. Mary Slasson of Neon Tommyreported that the anti-Assad activists believe that members of the pro Assad protesters”are paid informants by the [Syrian] government.” It has also been reported that anti-Assad activists are accusing the consulate staff of snapping photos of them at rallies around Southern California and passing information about them to the Syrian government’s intelligence agency.”
Remarkably, Kahf seems to be the first Syrian American in the L.A. area to lead such an effort to openly call out Dr. Chahabi, an American citizen, for his relationship with Syrian President Bashar Assad and his regime. Kahf points out that Chahabi’s behaviors and position with the Syrian government as a Consul General are not compatible with his position on the University of California-Irvine Foundation Board of Trustees. I also believe more importantly his position is not compatible with his citizenship oath as an American. Kahf appropriately called upon Chahabi to either dissociate himself from the Assad regime or be removed from the UC-Irvine Foundation Board. Matt Coker of theOrange County Weekly seems to be the only one reporting on this controversy. He notes that, “it is the opinion of many Syrian Americans that Chahabi is a government stooge…”
But the story of Chahabi goes far deeper than simply his position as Consul General and his offensive lip service for the pariah state of Syria he serves. A little basic research exposes that Chahabi’s family is far more intimately involved with Bashar Assad and his henchmen than anybody has cared to report. And for a leading California physician who sits on a major university’s foundation board of trustees, has served on the California Medical Board, and donated vast untold sums of monies to UCI and various politicians across the country this should have been a public scandal long ago. Perhaps the courageous people on the streets of Syria can bring us to a teaching moment against the culture of corruption that connects Dr. Chahabi and his family friend, Dr. Assad.

First, a little relevant background. Hazam Chahabi’s father is Hikmat Chahabi (also spelled Shihabi) who was one of Hafez Assad’s right hand henchmen. He was a Syrian Army general who served as Chief of Staff of the Army from 1974-1998. He received a degree in “Intelligence” from the Soviets in 1970. It is well known that the many of the Baathists leading military generals much like Chahabi learned their advanced thuggery from the Soviets. Chahabi was part of Hafez Assad’s inner circle serving on the “committee in charge of running the country” along with General Mustafa Tlass and Ali Duba known as leading criminals against humanity in Syria during the regime of Hafez Assad. Chahabi was head of the army when tanks surrounded Hama in 1982 and committed genocide against over 40,000 Syrians including women and children led by Rifat Assad. There was a similar heinous massacre in Tadmur in 1980against political prisoners with thousands dying in cold blood at the hands of the Syrian military. The Syrian Human Rights Committee has a detailed accounting of the massacre and murders as well as a number of other crimes against humanity perpetrated by Hafez Assad and his military (of whom General Hikmat Chahabi was a leading figure).
In fact, in his book, Killing Mr. Lebanon: The Assassination of Rafik Harriri and its impact on the Middle East (2007), Nicholas Blanford described in detail the coordinating role which General Hikmat Chahabi played in the Syrian occupation of Lebanon and the control of that nation’s infrastructure through a vast network of corruption. General Chahabi was part of the controlling clique of Syrian military generals that included Abdel Halim Khaddam, Ghazi Kanaan, and Walid Jumblatt. Lebanon was basically a Syrian colony controlled by this clique. Blanford additionally noted that the Syrian government in essence looted the Lebanese economy providing billions of dollars of cash infusion (some placed it at $4 billion per year by the end of the 90s) into an ailing Syrian economy.
Specifically, Blanford gives a number of examples of the deep corruption which this clique utilized to rape the Lebanese economy. He notes,
…Often using Lebanese politicians as front men, senior figures in Syria and their local allies are alleged to have made immense profits from the Lebanese reconstruction boom in the 1990s receiving protection commissions and securing monopolies in a wide array of sectors and selling goods and services at inflated rates.… Among the most well known was the awarding of Lebanon’s first mobile phone contracts to two companies, Cellis and Libancell, headed by Lebanese closely associated with Abdel-Halim khaddam and Hikmat Shehabi and their sons. With competitors barred from entering the market, these two companies were allowed to charge exorbitant fees, among the highest in the world at 13 cents per minute compared to 3 to 8 cents elsewhere in the Arab world.
Hazem Chahabi, M.D., Hikmat’s son, had been conveniently made Consul General in Newport Beach on October 12, 1995. He was obviously in place as honorary consulate while his father was still Chief of staff of the Syrian army and Hafez and his henchmen were still in control. In July 1998, General Chahabi handed in his resignation to Hafez and then joined his son in California for retirement. Mercifully to the Syrian people, Hafez died suddenly in 2000 at the age of 69. The ensuing power struggle in various branches of the government, police, intelligence, and military as Bashar took over the reins resulted in some reports that Hikmat may have been targeted for corruption charges- a euphemism for competitive thugs vying for control. Hikmat left apparently to avoid this mafia-like battle. Since then Hazem’s father, General Chahabi has even reportedly returned to Syria a few times for rather public visits with Bashar that probably provided cover for his family’s loyalty to Bashar amidst various power struggles. The Chahabis to the best of my knowledge have never uttered a known public rebuke of the evil perpetrated by Assad or his madmen including Hikmat Chahabi his Army chief of staff for almost 25 years. In fact a simple case could be made that General Chahabi and his son have the blood and enslavement of thousands upon thousands of Syrians on their hands not to mention the raping and pillaging of the Syrian and Lebanese economies and the incomes of their citizens.
It remains incredulous that in today’s age of information, these details about the Chahabis are not part of the recent reporting and public discussion about the complicity of Hazem Chahabi and his network of influence. With Dr. Hazem Chahabi’s close familial connections to the Assads and the Syrian military, the next question is what level of accountability should have been expected by the American taxpayer and members of institutions to which Dr. Chahabi belongs with regards to his corrupt Syrian bedfellows. With contributions registered regularly to candidates in congressional races like Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) and Keith Ellison (D-MN), it does not even seem to pass the sniff test that an open foreign agent (Consul General) of a pariah state should have such major financial influence upon American institutions with no public or personal accountability at all.
There needs to be an immediate public investigation into what Hazem Chahabi received if anything in exchange for all of those donations and more importantly what impact his involvement at UCI and in various political campaigns had upon American policy toward the pariah state of Syria. There also needs to be an investigation into why Chahabi’s history was not a red flag to any of the institutions and politicians to whom he gave donations or was given positions of leadership. The Chahabis have given apparently vast sums of money to University of California-Irvine (UCI)- underwriting events like the UCI Medal winners dinner where they gave $100,000 in 2003. The Chahabis later gave many additional donations to UCI including the largest ever single donation of $1 million in 2005. It would also be interesting to know who the initial investors were in Dr. Chahabi’s Newport Beach Diagnostic Center opened in theearly 90’s.
In essence as an American taxpayer with particular concern about the influence operations in the United States and the barbarism of the Assad regime against their own citizens, it is imperative for Dr. Chahabi to be questioned publicly about his complicity. The taxpayers all have an interest in knowing how much of his donations and contributions were directly connected to monies obtained from corruption his father and he were connected to in their leadership circles with the fascist regime of Hafez Assad and his son Bashar. The taxpayers have an interest in knowing what financial connections remain between Syria and the Chahabis. Were the millions he and his wife have donated proceeds from his practice, or were they monies obtained via his father or directly from the pillaging done by their clique during his father’s direct association with the Syrian regime, an association which his son continues to this day?

At the minimum, Chahabi’s much publicized philanthropy bought him a pathological blindness from the local community of southern California regarding the corruption in Syria of which his family came out of and remained uncritically and intimately enmeshed. Perhaps Dr. Chahabi’s move to the United States for medical specialization training and his posting as an ‘honorary’ Consul General combined with his father’s marginalization from Hafez Assad’s inner circle became an opportunity for the Chahabis to remain relevant and wealthy by becoming leaders in the current American influence operations of the Bashar Assad regime. It is exceedingly important for such an influential Californian to be transparent about the origin of the millions he donates to American institutions.
There is much to be concerned about with the sinister history, origins, and network of the Chahabi wealth and influence operation on American soil. It’s time to open an investigation and make an example of Dr. Chahabi.

This should also put on notice every other Syrian-American citizen like him who enjoys the freedoms which America gives them while dishonoring our nation through their overt and covert facilitation of Assad’s pariah state of Syria. Our United States of America deserves better. Our motherland of Syria and its courageous citizens deserve better.

Share

Aptos, CA psychologist: We CAN fix the Achilles heel weakness of Ryan’s medicare reform plan!

Try out now Ryan’s “premium support” by offering it to seniors age 55+ who have a private medical plan. Select a fixed number by lottery and try it out. If good enough for your Congressman it is good enough for the average citizen.

Share

Dip into healing waters

The Achilles heel weakness: In Ryan’s medicare reform plan the federal government imposes it by fiat on all recipients of a certain age There is a way to fix this weakness.

Instead of years out, offer the medicare reform plan now.

Instead of imposing it on millions, try it out by lottery on a few thousand people.

Instead of denying “premium plus” to those over a certain age, off it now to any senior age 55+ with current health insurance and wants to switch.

Dip Ryan’s “premium care” plan now into the healing waters of voluntary use by seniors age 55+.

This will heal the Achilles heel of Ryan’s medicare plan. When seniors who are not permitted coverage under Ryan’s plan (as too old) embrace it as good that will provide factual proof of its utility.

Who could set this up? There is a woman who, thwarted from political office in New York, created a terrific charter school in Harlem, New York. Students get entry to that school by lottery. That school competes successfully with the top private schools in New York City.

This is the kind of person who could quickly put together the necessary resources to try out a voluntary form of Ryan’s “premium support” medicare reform. What is her name?
DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share

Aptos, CA psychologist: No increase to 14 TRILLION debt. On voluntary basis, let’s try out Ryan’s “premium plus” medicare reform plan.

I for one, a licensed psychologist in California, welcome the Ryan “premium care” plan. Let’s try it out on a voluntary basis. I think it will work.

It’s time to cut up the federal government’s credit card, pay off what is due and save for rainy days ahead. Let’s face real death and ignore the phony death threat scare tactics put out by Democrats.

There’s much that happens unexpected in life and we need to be prepared. Just days ago, a tornado flattens an American town and hundreds of real people are truly dead.

In contrast, the Democrats create phony death and use scare tactics. Recently, the Democrats put out an ad depicting grandma in a wheel chair pushed off a cliff by Republican Ryan’s budget proposal to overhaul Medicare.

Real deaths are coming:

The real deaths that will occur are when your or my grandchild is denied a life saving procedure because 15 bureaucrats running ObamaCare or WhatEverCare decide that it is not cost effective and our grandchildren cannot have that medical procedure.

Another real death that’s happening is the declining value of the American dollar. Will we stop printing the $1.00 bill as it has the value of a nickel?

Instead of scare death threats against granny let’s deal with real issues in a grownup manner.

If a family had out of control debt and went to a debt counselor they would be told to stop adding to their debt. Likewise, the government must be told by voters to stop adding to the 14 trillion dollar debt.

Likewise — this is what we must tell our politicians and the government:

Cut up the credit cards. Figure out how to consolidate all debt. Prioritize what gets paid first. Work out arrangements with those you owe when to pay them back.

Because entitlements account for such a large part of the budget — about 50% —entitlement reform must happen.

So, read up on Ryan’s budget plan. It is sensible and foresighted.

The Democrats have offered no budget. The Republicans are offering one. Everyone needs to get into the conversation.

I for one think that the way to improve the Ryan plan for Medicare reform is to implement it on a trial basis. Let anyone age 55 plus who currently has health insurance the opportunity to switch to “premium plus”. By lottery select, say, 2000 persons. Then put the pedal to the metal and see how the program works.

The total number that want a chance to get selected will show how popular the Ryan “premium plan” actually is. And within a year or so we will have real data as to how senior citizens actually like the program.

This is a voluntary way to “try out” Ryan’s Premium Plus plan with seniors who — according to the Ryan plan — are stuck with Medicare as they are too old. Let the older folks age 55+ decide based on real experience.

The “Premium Plus” Ryan medicare reform plan is largely the same as what Congress persons get.

In my view, what is good enough for Congressman Sam Farr, age 69, is good enough for all of the citizens of California. And all U.S. citizens.

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share

Aptos, CA psychologist: What promotes religious sense of identity — meatless Fridays & the Latin Mass for Catholics? And for your faith?

Meatless Fridays for American Catholics? Back comes the Latin Mass? Will American bishops follow the lead of Britain and Wales which seek year round abstaining from meat on Fridays.

Share

Catholic meatless Fridays & Latin Mass return?

Meatless Friday for American Catholics? The return of the Tridentine Mass in Latin?

Pope Benedict XVI lifted restrictions on the old Latin Mass in 2007 which has excited a disproportionate interest among the young.

Now bishops in England and Wales, if they have their way, will require Catholics to abstain from meat every Friday year-round.

Will American bishops follow their lead?

Sociologists such as Roger Finke and Rodney Stark have observed that churches tend to lose vigor when they relax demands on adherents, especially those tenets and practices that cut against the grain of wider society. In economic terms, lowering the “costs” of membership in this way ends up diminishing its benefits, among other ways by loosening the bonds of community.
—————————–
So, according to some sociologists, being different from others by having unusual religious practises enhances a sense of identity for those in that religion.

What makes Episcopalians different that fosters their sense of identity? Perhaps that Henry VIII had multiple wives so today Episcopalians stand up for the legal rights of those who are “out”. Right now that includes bisexuals, the transgendered and persons with sexual identity issues.

How about Jehovah’s Witnesses? What fosters their sense of identity that keeps them strong? Jehovah Witnesses are different because they do not salute the flag, refuse to serve in the armed forces and require that the government pay for bloodless liver transfusions (as blood transfusions are not allowed).

And then there are the 300 million Muslims. What makes them different which supports their Islamic sense of religious identity? Some say that Islamic religion has as its basis Sharia law which promotes female genitalia cutting, and has different laws for women than men.

In Aptos, CA there is a catholic church and an episcopalian church a couple blocks from each other. Both churches frequently sing the same opening hymn: All are Welcome. But if you want to be identify with either church is it because of how that group differs from others and that those differences cement bonding between members?

What I notice casually is that Catholics tend to play more bingo, gamble and serve more wine than Episcopalians.

Other than saying the Apostles’ Creed Episcopalians are free to interpret it as they choose. Or ignore it all together. Local Episcopalian churches in Santa Cruz County don’t seem to be growing. Is it because they need different ways of identifying with each other — that separate them from other religions — than currently exist? There is an emblem that identifies Episcopalian churches which some Episcopalians put on the back fender of their cars. I saw one recently and wondered, Is this what Episcopalians have to offer as how they identify?

My guess is that meatless Fridays and Latin Masses will become popular as a way for Catholics to identify.

DrCameronJackson@gmail.com

Share

Firenze Sage: What’s behind door #1?

head of IMF to spread his wealth or go to jail?

Friends of alleged hotel sex fiend Dominique Strauss-

Kahn secretly contacted the accusing maid’s impoverished family, offering them money.

The woman has an extended family in the former French colony of Guinea in West Africa.

“They already talked with her family,” a French businesswoman with close ties to Strauss-Kahn and his family told The Post. “For sure, it’s going to end up on a quiet note.”

“He’ll get out of it and will fly back to France. He won’t spend time in jail. The woman will get a lot of money,” said the source, adding that a seven-figure sum has been bandied about.

Her extended family lives in a village that lacks paved roads, electricity and phone lines. The average monthly income is $45, which is near-starvation.
—————————————————————-

Well Solomon,
let Sugar Daddy spread the sugar or put him back in the can.

FirenzeSage48@gmail.com

Share

Assist Arab/ Islamic nations to absorb refugees from West Bank …

Let Arabs and Islamic countries absorb the refugees from the 1967 war with Israel. Israel is the only stand on its own democracy in the middle east. For its protection and survival the West Bank best belongs to Israel who won it fairly in war. Time that Arabs took care of their own. The West can help Israel by sending money and support to re-locate families to Arab nations. A two nation state is not tenable.

Share
West Bank necessary to Israeil's survival

Israel is the only non-Islamic state in the Middle East. Attacked by Islamic countries Israel won in 1967. Israel won a huge area of Egypt, Gaza, and the West Bank.

Today, instead of a two state solution the Arab countries of Islamic faith need to take in the Palestinian refugees.

The West can help with money so that West Bank Islamic families can relocate to other Arabic countries of Islamic faith.

The West Bank best belongs to Israel by 2000 years of history and war. The West needs to make sure that Israel has the political boundaries it needs to survive and remain a model for democracy in the middle east.

If Islam wants to show that it is a religion of peace, then let the Islamic middle eastern countries collectively assist these refugees from the 1967 war.

—————————

Thursday night, President Obama angered both the Israelis and the Palestinians when he officially stated his support for a Palestinian state within the borders of the land Israel seized during the 1967 war.

The two-state solution is nothing new, but many Republicans are using this as an opportunity to capture the Jewish vote and support from the powerful lobby group AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee).

According to potential 2012 Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, Obama “threw Israel under the bus.”

The position appears to be controversial to many on the right who vehemently oppose the two-state solution because they fear Israel will never be safe.

On the more left, many are angry that Obama essentially admitted that Israel needs to be protected from Palestine, not the other way around. Obama proved one thing Thursday night: Talking about the Middle East is never light.
.

Share

Firenze Sage: Sue not Souza

Joan Heffington, who has run for governor of Kansas and was taken to court by the state attorney general, is suing Derby Public Schools because her son was cut from the marching band.

Heffington said in a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court that her 17-year-old son is being denied his right to an education.

She claims her son has special needs and Derby has not given him accommodations as required by law.

The focus of the lawsuit is Heffington’s son, a trombone player who was cut from the marching band. ———————————————
Hey ma, a lawsuit does not a trombone player make.

Share

How stop Iran from atomic bombs? Stop sale of uranium to Iran …

Some sensible actions the West has taken in the middle east:
We released former Egyptian ruler Mubarak’s money to Libyan rebels. We sanctioned Syrian dictator al-Asad and his close advisers.

Another sensible action is to prevent Iran from having nuclear bombs. So the Arab Spring continues and democracy flourishes, we must contain Iran’s nuclear bomb program. Solution: Put penalties on any government or entity that sells uranium to Iran. On the immediate horizon is a sale of 455,000 tons of raw uranium by Zimbabwe to Iran…
—————————————————
With the drama of the Arab Spring and the death of Osama bin Laden dominating the headlines, you might have missed the most important development in months surrounding Iran’s nuclear program: Zimbabwe’s emergence as a key enabler of the Islamic Republic’s march toward the atomic bomb.

In recent days, officials in Harare have confirmed that the government of Robert Mugabe is finalizing a massive resources deal with Tehran, in defiance of United Nations sanctions aimed at derailing Iran’s nuclear push. That agreement, in the works ever since Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visited the African state in April 2010, would provide the Iranian regime with preferential access to the country’s estimated 455,000 tons of raw uranium over the next five years. The deal sheds light on what amounts to a major chink in the Islamic Republic’s nuclear armor. For all of its atomic bluster, the Iranian regime lacks enough of the critical raw material necessary to independently acquire a nuclear capability. Indeed, according to nonproliferation experts, Iran’s known uranium ore reserves are “limited and mostly of poor quality.” As a result, it desperately needs steady supplies of uranium ore from abroad. Without them, the Islamic Republic’s nuclear plans would, quite simply, grind to a halt.

Associated Press

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, left,and Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, during a trade fair in Bulawayo, in April 2010.
.This vulnerability is deepening, moreover. Iran’s aging uranium stockpile, which the Islamic Republic acquired from South Africa in the 1970s, is mostly depleted. As a result, Tehran in recent months has been feverishly courting a motley crew of foreign partners in search of new and stable sources of uranium to fuel its nuclear habit. According to a confidential intelligence summary from an unnamed International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) member state this past February, the Islamic Republic has focused on Africa, home to a number of key uranium producers including Zimbabwe, Senegal, Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Tehran’s procurement patterns offer a major opportunity for the West. Over the years, Washington and its European allies have worked feverishly to prevent Iran’s acquisition of the technology needed for its nuclear program, with only limited success. Today, despite numerous covert initiatives ranging from the promulgation of deliberately faulty designs to the sabotage of critical materials, the IAEA currently estimates Iran to have some 11,000 operational centrifuges and a stockpile of more than two tons of low-enriched uranium—a sufficient quantity, nuclear scientists say, to build more than one nuclear weapon if it is refined further.

Other efforts have likewise had only limited impact. Even Stuxnet, the mysterious computer worm that ravaged Iran’s nuclear-control systems between mid-2009 and late 2010, is by now largely a spent force. The Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington-based nonproliferation think tank, estimates that at the height of its effectiveness, the malicious software destroyed just over 10% of the 9,000 uranium enrichment centrifuges at Iran’s Natanz facility, and that the virus “is unlikely to destroy more.”

Comparatively little attention, however, has been paid to the critical fuel necessary for Iran’s nuclear progress. Over the past three years, Western chancelleries have marshaled considerable diplomatic efforts to dissuade potential uranium suppliers such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Brazil from providing Tehran the raw material needed for its nuclear program. For all of their concern, however, Washington policy makers have not yet given serious thought to penalizing countries for their uranium sales to Iran, or crafted a legislative framework that makes it possible to do so.

They should. By identifying and then punishing Tehran’s current suppliers of uranium ore, the U.S. and its allies can slow its acquisition of the raw material necessary to realize its nuclear ambitions—and send a clear signal to potential future sources of uranium for Iran’s atomic effort, like Zimbabwe, that their involvement with the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program will come at a steep economic and political cost.

In its ongoing bid to derail Iran’s nuclear drive, Capitol Hill is now said to be contemplating new sanctions aimed at further tightening the international noose around Tehran. Iran’s flirtation with Zimbabwe strongly suggests that lawmakers would do well to focus less on trying to stop Iran’s centrifuges from spinning and more on making sure that Iran’s nuclear machinery is running on empty.

Share

fight colds with strong, garlic-onion soup

10-15 large garlic cloves, chopped or crushed.
1 onion, sliced
2 TBS butter
6 cups chicken broth (low sodium)
juice of half a lemon
1 pkg garlic croutons

In a heavy soup pot or wok, saute garlic and onion for 2-3 minutes until soft, being careful not to brown them.

Add 3 cups broth and simmer on low heat for 30 minutes.

Dump into cuisinart or blender and puree until smooth.

Return to heat. Add the ofther 3 cups one at a time. For those who may like it stronger use only 5 rather than 6 cups broth. Stir in lemon juice.

Cover and simmer for another 15-20 minutes.

Serve warm with a handful of croutons floating on top.

Share

Not a moat with alligators as proposed by Obama, we need immigraton reform with same thoughtfulness as Ryan budget proposal….

Border needs a fence -- not a moat with alligaters as Obama opined
America faces a real illegal immigration problem. It also faces an unemployment problem, a spending problem, an entitlements problem and a national security problem.

On immigration, the right solution is making a real commitment to border security, workplace and immigration enforcement, a temporary worker program and visa reforms to get employers the employees they need. On all of the above, the solution starts with a president who is willing to lead and get down to business — but not the business of taking cheap shots to score points in the political arena

Share