Tag: free speech

fight BIDEN’s privatization of CENSORSHIP via Facebook & Twitter

Individuals & websites can and must  fight  President BIDEN’s  wrongful  censorship of your  free  speech.  See recent article in the Wall Street Journal, Jan. 30 – 31, 2021.    The Constitution  CAN Crack Section 230. 

The Biden government  has done NOTHING to support first amendment free speech for either   President Trump (permanent suspension  of Trump’s  Twitter account)  or  his 74 million voters (ELECTION FRAUD supposedly did not happen says  Big Tech which repeatedly enforces censorship of viewpoints  by suspension of accounts and removal of posts).

BIDEN — who uses an  Executive Order to  oppose  private prisons — supports  Twitter, Facebook and Google’s privatized censorship via Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act.  These companies use Section 230  to crack down on conservative viewpoints. Standing behind these companies, the GOVERNMENT sets the censorship agenda opposing   anything that Trump or his supporters did.

Information YOU need to know:   The f US Constitution prohibits the federal government from “viewpoint discrimination”  — which is precisely what the BIDEN government is engaged in by using Twitter and Facebook to censor free speech.

The Wall Street Journal says:  “Facebook, Twitter and Google censorship muzzles the electronic public square, distorts political and cultural conversation and limit’s our freedom to sort out the truth for ourselves.”

So what can the ‘little guy and gal’ do about it?  Read another WSJ article The Man Who Drove Game Stop Mania.

What to do?   Akin to those retail investors shaking up the investment world, those 74 million voters for Trump can  and must continue to   shake up politics as usual in Washington D.C.

Diversify.   Get new accounts other than Twitter and Facebook. Parler supposedly will come back.  There’s MeWe and GAB.  Take a look at Rumble for videos.

Try The EPOCH TIMES for a balanced source of news.

Ann Corcoran — says she is dropping Google and no more G-mail account — re-posted what a man who attended the Jan 6 rally has to say. The man was brought in for questioning due to facial recognition that he attended the rally. See Ann’s posts on her blog Frauds, Crooks and Criminals.

Trump DID pull back the curtain and reveal lots of BAD actors.   Don’t forget it.

It’s time for ‘the little guys and gals’ to fight viewpoint discrimination  (forbidden by the USA Constitution) done by Biden’s use of Section 230 to curtail your free speech.

Massive 2020  ELECTION FRAUD  by Biden & Democrats and the  need for ELECTION INTEGRITY going forward are the issues Biden ignores.

What are your thoughts?

written by DrCameronJackson  1/30/2021

 

 

Share

FACEBOOK censors political speech about “the Big Guy” Biden’s 10% cut of Chinese money

No discussion allowed  for the public on Facebook about stories — about the Bidens — which   the public wants to know and chat about ….

So  is Joe Biden   “the big guy” who gets a  10% cut of all   money his son Hunter got from a deal with the Chinese?  Hunter’s partner says,  Yes!  More evidence keeps leaking out ….

“A former business partner to Hunter Biden, Tony Bobulinski, has made a bombshell statement that not only are the emails on the Biden laptop authentic but the reference to giving a cut to “the big guy” was indeed a reference to former Vice President Joe Biden. More emails are emerging that show Hunter Biden referring to his family as his asset in these dealings.

The emails that have attracted the most attention refer to an actual meeting of Joe  Biden with these foreign figures and one referring to a proposed equity split of “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” Bobulinski confirms that “H” was used for Hunter Biden and that his father was routinely called “the big guy” in these discussions.” [from Jonathan Turley]

Clearly the public has a constitutionally protected right of free speech to “chat” about all sorts of things.

People used to use the telephone to chat about whatever.  Now they ‘text’ and “post’ and write blogs.  The ways of communicating have changed dramatically.  For example, when was the last time you wrote a long letter to a close relative?

When was the last time you texted someone?

FACEBOOK’s protections as a “platform” must be reined in.  And the public needs to “speak up” as did some  it Letters published on the Wall Street Journal 10/22/2020.   It’s an Easy Fix  — Facebook’s 323 protections are good only so long as constitutionally protected speech is ALSO protected.  So — if you want to post speech typically protected THEN Facebook can’t touch it.   If Facebook does — then Facebook loses protections.  Simple Fix.

written by  psychologist  Cameron Jackson   jaj48@aol.com

Share

Facebook tactics: Kamala Harris’ former press secretary decides which Trump tweets violate “community standards” policy

That ‘tweet, tweet’  by  Trump   [“kids are  almost immune” to Covid-19]    violates  “community standards” says   Kamala Harris’s former press secretary who suspended Trump’s account.

Aptos Psychologist:  This is more than ‘bias’.  This is  Democrat campaign tactics.    Why suspend  Trump’s account  based on  ‘information’  that has been widely reported in San Jose’s  Mercury News and elsewhere?   It’s largely been  accepted   that kids  are  less likely to get or transmit  Covid-19.  In some instances kids get a severe form of it.

Facebook’s ‘arbiter’ of  “community standards”  is an enforcer for limited free speech. Their version of free speech.

As for real ‘mis-information’, the public finds the media to blame for the political divide.  84% of the public  blame the media for bias.   That includes  bias by Kamala Harris’ former press secretary  aka arbiter of “community standards” for Twitter.

written by Cameron Jackson  drcameronjackson@gmail.com 

 

Share

Free Speech! Know something about Aptos, CA or enviorns?

 

What do you know? Speak up about Aptos CA and enviorns

Free Speech!  Know something about Aptos CA or enviorns?

Your VOICE is welcome  here on Monterey Bay Forum  — a ‘forum’ for all views.

Licensed Psychologist PSY 14762 Dr. Cameron Jackson writes under her own name on issues including autism and psychology.

Other people chose to write under ‘pen names’ — and you can too. So long as you have some expertise on a subject and will be polite — you are welcome!

Speak up!  Free speech is precious.  And yes there are ‘consequences’ to free speech  — people may disagree with you.  And that, too, is a precious gift of our Constitution.

Location:  The Aptos CA and Santa Cruz CA area are located about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA.

Housing:   The medium price for a home in Santa Cruz just surpassed $850 K  — up considerably in the last 3-4 years.

Traffic:    Traffic in this area has become …. impossible …. people now plan their day around traffic conditions.

Sanctuary Cities:   Santa Cruz as well as San Francisco are ‘Sanctuary Cities’ ….  which have  legal consequences for all.

 

written by Cameron Jackson

Share

MSNBC host: Every good Republican has a tank … part of the right to bear arms

 Every good Republican has a tank…. part of the right to bear arms …so says MSNBC Chris Matthews.  

Thursday on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” host Chris Matthews said Republicans were “fanatics” on guns and that they even supported private ownership of tanks.

Chris Matthews  added, “Well you know what the Republican’s says in their platform that the right to bear arms precedes the Constitution. It’s a God-given sort of theological right. They treat this like religion. I don’t know how to explain it. It’s a religious, essential notion to them that everybody should have any kind of gun they want, any—a bazooka, a tank. They never put a limit on it, ever.”

———————————————————————–

Firenze Sage responds:   Yes, Chris,  it is an unalienable right to defend oneself against the govt so as to protect your right to say stupid things.

Share

No freedom to speak for conservatives Ann Coulter or Horowitz at CAL Berkeley

ex-President Fox of Mexico speaks at CAL Berkeley but Ann Coulter cannot speak there.
ex-President Fox of Mexico speaks at CAL Berkeley but  conservative Ann Coulter — scheduled to speak on immigration — cannot speak at CAL Berkeley.

  Ex-President of Mexico Fox  speaks  at Berkeley. On immigration and other issues.    Conservative Ann Coulter — scheduled to speak April 27 on immigration —  cannot.

CAL Berkeley tells conservative  Ann Coulter that the university cannot protect her from possible riots. Therefore,  CAL Berkeley told Coulter she cannot come on campus  to  discuss immigration on April 27.

Don’t the police protect students and visitors to the  CAL Berkeley campus?

    It’s time for the Berkeley and Oakland police to protect life and property of students and visitors to the CAL Berkeley campus?

What did  the  former President of Mexico Fox say about immigration? That would be an interesting conversation —  Ann Coulter and ex-President Fox discussing immigration.  

 

Former President of Mexico  Fox  continues to engage in political discourse, most noticeably through his tweets in which Fox expresses his open disagreement with President Trump’s stances on immigration, and calls for the American public to “wake up.”

CAL Berkeley, a liberal college,   had to “cancel” yet another guest speaker because of safety concerns. The Berkeley College Republicans, BridgeCal and Young America’s Foundation were planning on having Ann Coulter address their groups, until they received an email from the university’s vice chancellors.

“We have been unable to find a safe and suitable venue for your planned April 27 event featuring Ann Coulter,” vice chancellors Scott Biddy and Stephen Sutton emailed the student groups. “In the wake of events surrounding the planned appearance by (right-wing speaker) Milo Yiannopoulos in February, as well as several riots which have occurred in recent weeks in the city of Berkeley, we have increased our scrutiny regarding the time and location of high-profile speakers so that these events can go forward unimpeded.”

The university also requested that if Coulter should decide to still come to the campus, that they not disclose the location until closer to the event and only students would be allowed to attend. She agreed to the conditions but told the university she had her own conditions, as described on YAF’s blog:

1) That the University of California chancellor request that the Oakland chief of police refrain from telling his men to stand down and ignore law-breaking by rioters attempting to shut down conservative speakers, as he has done in the past; and

2) That UC-Berkeley announce in advance that any students engaging in violence, mayhem or heckling to prevent an invited speaker from speaking would be expelled.

As Coulter explained, “If Berkeley wants to have free speech, it can have it.”

Last week, conservative speaker David Horowitz’s speech was also canceled after UCB police told the student groups Horowitz’s safety could not be ensured. The decision was made after the university instructed the group to hold the event during the middle of the day and on the outskirts of campus.

The Republican groups on Cal’s campus feel the cancelation of conservative speakers is an infringement upon their First Amendment right to free speech.

Now the question becomes: will Berkeley ever do anything to ensure conservatives can come to the liberal hotbed without a riot ensuing?

My guess? It’s probably not at the top of their priority list.

UPDATE: Coulter spoke with The Hollywood Reporter, telling them:

“Yes, it was officially banned,” Coulter said of her planned April 27 appearance. “But they can’t stop me. I’m an American. I have Constitutional rights.”

Coulter had accepted an invitation from two campus groups — the Berkeley College Republicans and BridgeUSA — to deliver a speech about immigration, the topic of her last two books, both of which were New York Times bestsellers. “If that’s banned, then no conservative can speak,” Coulter told THR on Wednesday.

“Meanwhile, corrupt banana republic leaders like Vincente Fox have the red carpet rolled out for them on the taxpayer’s dime.” Fox, the former president of Mexico, spoke in Berkeley this week.

Share

freedoms – Trump and Hilary compared Feb. 2017

 

Freedom
Freedom to speak, travel, work …and TWEET!

Free speech:  Freedom to tweet or not to tweet.  Trump tweets. That’s fast communication to America.

Hilary  Clinton still  looks for her lost emails.  Does Russia have Hilary’s emails?

Freedom to self deport:  A new freedom!  Trump enforces immigration laws.  Hilary sought Amnesty and  policy of ‘come out of the shadows’.

Freedom to travel: Safe travel increases for Americans?    Trump hires 5,000 more Border Patrol and 10,000 more federal enforcement (ICE) and can deputize local law enforcement to enforce immigration laws.  Americans warned about travel around Mexico.    Mexico becomes less safe by the day with gun battles in the streets and warnings where and updates where not to travel.        written by C. Jackson

 

Share

free speech? 100 UC-CAL profs say Nope they don’t like free speech.

 

100 UC-CAL professors do not want free speech for those they disagree with.
100 UC-CAL professors do not want free speech for those they disagree with.

Free speech for those you disagree with?  No says UC California professors.

‘Free speech’: UC Berkeley profs tell chancellor they want Milo appearance canceled

Approximately 100 professors at the University of California Berkeley have signed on to a letter asking the school chancellor to cancel the February 1 appearance by conservative provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos.

According to The Daily Californian, the January 3 letter originated with a dozen professors who deem Milo’s conduct “harassment, slander, defamation, and hate speech,” and as such violates the college’s code of conduct.

Nearly 90 additional profs have signed on since.

“We believe wholeheartedly in free speech and in the presentation of views that may be controversial or disturbing, politically or personally,” said David Landreth, one of the 12 who composed the letter (and whose “main expertise” is materialism — “in its Marxist, ancient, and ‘new materialist’ manifestations”).

“However,” he added, “Mr. Yiannopoulos’s public talks routinely veer into direct personal harassment of individuals; they often also call for such harassment and aim to incite it.”

——————————————————-

Firenze Sage:  Why  — oh  — why should we care what an “expert” in materialism thinks? Poor baby may get personally harassed.

Share

You’r fired but we love free speech! Prof fired re Black Lives Matter

free-speech

 Prof Put on Leave for Comparing Black Lives Matter to KKK in Facebook comment.  Free speech?

The University of Virginia announced Friday that a professor has agreed to take leave after posting a Facebook comment that called Black Lives Matter racist and compared it to the Klu Klux Klan.

In a Friday statement to the campus, Provost Tom Katsouleas slammed business professor Douglas Muir’s Facebook post, emphasizing the university’s commitment to fighting racism and social injustice.

Katsouleas seemed to say that Muir’s opinion, in and of itself, threatened free speech on campus.

The university’s commitment to social justice “in no way squelches academic freedom, which welcomes dissent and encourages the voices of others whose perspectives may differ from ours—thereby adding new insights to our own,” Katsouleas wrote. “But statements such as Mr. Muir’s do not foster intellectual exploration, nor do they encourage the voices of others. … We can engage in healthy debate and respectful disagreement without offering insults that suppress the free expression of ideas.”

________________

Firenze Sage:  We encourage free speech that we feel fosters intellectual exploration and encourage voices of others. And we decide if it does!!  Do these academics even read what they write?

Share